The 92 point myth

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

United 18/19 were, in my opinion a much superior team to 24/25 but only reached 89 points

The standard of opposition makes a big difference. The league in 18/19 was quantifiably stronger.
 

It wasn't a fluke we earned so many points last season but anyone who watched most or all of our games will have seen quite a few games where the result belied the performance and we succeeded due to teams passing up a number of chances they should have taken.

Still a very very good return but not a season to make assumptions that a similar return would automatically happen again.
 
Yes they do but right now it’s the Wilder haters who are not letting it drop and are insufferable, instead of sitting back with a big smile on their faces they are on here putting a right shift in over the last couple of days telling us how bad Wilder actually was, really trying to convince us all. And they are still going!!

He’s gone move on ffs and if anyone wants to say it’s sad and wish him the best or whatever let them, leave them to it, but we don’t need posters then talking utter bollocks about how shit he was over and over and over.
I get that. At times it has felt like Brexiteers mocking Remainers in the aftermath of the referendum. I guess it’s a reflection of the sad state of society in an unhappy and angry country.
 
United cruised to victory in most games we took the lead in. Teams barely laid a glove on us most of the time. Like Mourinho's Chelsea in his first spell. 1-0 and the games finished.
Did you leave games 15 minutes before the end to get to the pub? Comfortable finishes were very rare, the last 10 minutes were usually sitting very deep with backs to the wall, hanging on
 
Winning games doesn't automatically make you the better team. If a team has 75% possession all match, 20 shots on goal, 13 shots on target but somehow don't score and the other team score with their one and only chance then that doesn't make the winning team the better team in that match. This is largely my point. Seperate the performances from the results. Just because you won doesn't mean you were good. By your reasoning Sunderland were the better team in the play off final because they won?
they were the better team most of the second half
 
I get that. At times it has felt like Brexiteers mocking Remainers in the aftermath of the referendum. I guess it’s a reflection of the sad state of society in an unhappy and angry country.
Says the leader of the insufferable Wilder haters.

Actually a good analogy because like the Brexiteers I imagine folk like you will never ever admit this was a mistake regardless of what happens.
 
All I've read pretty much everywhere since it was announced that Wilder has gone/was going is that the owners are mad to sack him because he got us to 92 points last season. The new manager allegedly won't get us to 92 points again as only Wilder could achieve this.

I'm going to call b/s on this myth.

Have a read of this. I think he's nailed it.


My thoughts are that the majority of fans against the new appointment are from the older generation (no offence intended).
Football has moved on, and it's moved on very quickly in the past 5-10years.

There's a lot of our fanbase who think football is still played with fast wingers down the flanks to whip balls into a target man - "gerrit forrard!".
How many times do you hear groans in the crowd when after 3 or 4 passes into midfield, it eventually comes back to the GK to try and start again. It's all about the press now, and how to beat that press whether going through it, or over it.

Gone are the days of an Overmars, Giggs or Beckham type winger. The best "wingers" these days are Salah, Foden, Grealish etc. these aren't "wingers" as we used to know them, but they play out wide, where wingers used to play. But they don't hug the line like days of old, they drift all over the place. They're hybrid players that operate out wide, as an attacking midfielder and even as strikers.

That's just a couple of examples as to how the game has evolved on the pitch... off the pitch it's evolved too. It's data driven. The United buzzword for this is "AI". This has scared the shit out of our older fans - "what's wrong wi sendin a bluddy scout to gu an watch um?"

When they say AI, they mean data driven transfers. They'll input key stats into the system and tweak it to suit the type of player they need.
Do people think that the Leicester scouts just randomly turned up at a Le Havre game and luckily stumbled across Mahrez? Did Brentford just randomly bump into Mbuemo in the Troyes town centre? Brighton have picked up Barco, Mac Allister and Buonanotte as youngsters from Argentina. They won't have scouts just sat watching games over there hoping to find a gem - they'll gather the data then visit when it seems worthwhile.

I think the fans who are dead against this shift are more scared than disappointed. It's outside their comfort zone. As the article above states - are there any other clubs so reliant on having staff who "get the club"? Maybe it's that mentality that's held us back all these years 🤷‍♂️

¡Vamos, hagámoslo!
 
It doesn't literally mean that, no. League position is impacted by lots of factors, like what other teams do, for example.

There is a difference in the first and second halves of the season, which again are due to many different factors, none of which are necessarily the tactics. We lost Souttar, we had a particularly bad week with a drop in form and three losses that will greatly skew the statistics. You can have a bad run of form playing with any tactics.

We had the third biggest budget and finished third with a very high points total. That some fans are desperate to let everyone know it was a massive failure, and they understood exactly why months ago, and that if the manager just listened to them and tried their tactics we'd have been miles clear at the top, is just sad imo.
Not sure I share your view that people are trying to describe this as a massive failure. There will always be those extremes but I'm not getting that from the majority on here.

I will hold my hands up and admit that after the rumours hit, I spent the days looking for reasons why such a monumental decision was made. There are many that have been added on here but although I didn't particularly want him to go, I'm not fighting the board for him to stay.

Some of that is due to the fact that although 92 points was great, I didn't enjoy last season. The performances were mostly mediocre, it always felt like we were waiting to click, never got a sense of team stability on a style of play or best 11 etc.

I agree with OP that 92 points doesn't paint the full picture of the season.

I'm certainly not looking to shit on last season or call it a complete failure, but we didn't achieve our end-goal, I didn't enjoy watching most of it, and I was quite frustrated by a lot of things that felt in the managers control.

Wilder was the best manager I've ever seen without question but not last years version unfortunately.
 
From, view from.

“how on earth have sheff united sacked a manager who got them 92 points for selles , i thought our owner was crazy”

“There is absolutely zero chance that Selles wins 92 points next season.”

The football was pragmatic and negative at times

Stubborn tactically and didn’t maximise our squad’s potential


Remains to be seen..
 
Says the leader of the insufferable Wilder haters.

Actually a good analogy because like the Brexiteers I imagine folk like you will never ever admit this was a mistake regardless of what happens.
Point me to any of my posts where I have said I hate Wilder? While you’re at it, you will probably come across the ones where I say that I’m grateful to him for the first 4 years and that he deserves legend status.

You don’t half talk out of your arse 😂😂
 
Not sure I share your view that people are trying to describe this as a massive failure. There will always be those extremes but I'm not getting that from the majority on here.
Neither am I getting it, yes there is one or two dead against it but reading some posts you’d think those that liked Wilder are all dead against Selles and now are kicking off. It’s simply not true but just a narrative some are going with for some strange reason.

Most Wilder fans are saying the same thing, sad to see him go but now looking forward to what Selles has to offer. That’s my feelings also, now looking forward to this season with an equal amount of excitement and trepidation. Not 100% sure it will work out but certainly praying it does and he’s the man.
 
Have a read of this. I think he's nailed it.


My thoughts are that the majority of fans against the new appointment are from the older generation (no offence intended).
Football has moved on, and it's moved on very quickly in the past 5-10years.

There's a lot of our fanbase who think football is still played with fast wingers down the flanks to whip balls into a target man - "gerrit forrard!".
How many times do you hear groans in the crowd when after 3 or 4 passes into midfield, it eventually comes back to the GK to try and start again. It's all about the press now, and how to beat that press whether going through it, or over it.

Gone are the days of an Overmars, Giggs or Beckham type winger. The best "wingers" these days are Salah, Foden, Grealish etc. these aren't "wingers" as we used to know them, but they play out wide, where wingers used to play. But they don't hug the line like days of old, they drift all over the place. They're hybrid players that operate out wide, as an attacking midfielder and even as strikers.

That's just a couple of examples as to how the game has evolved on the pitch... off the pitch it's evolved too. It's data driven. The United buzzword for this is "AI". This has scared the shit out of our older fans - "what's wrong wi sendin a bluddy scout to gu an watch um?"

When they say AI, they mean data driven transfers. They'll input key stats into the system and tweak it to suit the type of player they need.
Do people think that the Leicester scouts just randomly turned up at a Le Havre game and luckily stumbled across Mahrez? Did Brentford just randomly bump into Mbuemo in the Troyes town centre? Brighton have picked up Barco, Mac Allister and Buonanotte as youngsters from Argentina. They won't have scouts just sat watching games over there hoping to find a gem - they'll gather the data then visit when it seems worthwhile.

I think the fans who are dead against this shift are more scared than disappointed. It's outside their comfort zone. As the article above states - are there any other clubs so reliant on having staff who "get the club"? Maybe it's that mentality that's held us back all these years 🤷‍♂️

¡Vamos, hagámoslo!
Quite patronising but I cant argue with a lot of it.

My only slight problem with it is that Wilder for the most part last season played 4-2-3-1 so we didn't play with the Giggs, Beckhams, Overmars type.

So as an old fart I'm quite flexible in how we want to play. We played 4-2-3-1, 3-5-2 and 4-4-2 at various parts of the season. Totally confuses the life out of me ;)

I even like the way Man City play. I also like how Bournemouth counter attack etc.

One thing that hasn't changed in football though is that if you don't create chances (however that may be) you're far less likely to score.
 
Neither am I getting it, yes there is one or two dead against it but reading some posts you’d think those that liked Wilder are all dead against Selles and now are kicking off. It’s simply not true but just a narrative some are going with for some strange reason.

Most Wilder fans are saying the same thing, sad to see him go but now looking forward to what Selles has to offer. That’s my feelings also, now looking forward to this season with an equal amount of excitement and trepidation. Not 100% sure it will work out but certainly praying it does and he’s the man.
It does remind of the debates that this forum was having on the return of Wilder, how many that were dead against it and how many were pro-Wilder. If you look at WIlder MK2, it read's one relegation, no promotion however that isn't the full story with him really taking the reins of a 3 legged donkey in the national whilst in the Premier League. Last season in a way he got unlucky, you had Blaster's injury and in particular Souttar really didn't help. I am not sure when this new "data driven AI" has been launched but can only imagine it was with the intro of COH Sports and not under the Prince, so on that basis, bringing back Wilder wasn't the worst of ideas as it's not like we as a bottom of the table Premier League club with an owner trying to sell were a massively attractive option for many managers but now with this new way of thinking we need someone that can adapt to it. Time will tell
 

Neither am I getting it, yes there is one or two dead against it but reading some posts you’d think those that liked Wilder are all dead against Selles and now are kicking off. It’s simply not true but just a narrative some are going with for some strange reason.

Most Wilder fans are saying the same thing, sad to see him go but now looking forward to what Selles has to offer. That’s my feelings also, now looking forward to this season with an equal amount of excitement and trepidation. Not 100% sure it will work out but certainly praying it does and he’s the man.
There's always extremes on both sides, and often some people feel the need to be the most extreme, twitter seems to be like that a lot.

There's always going to be some adjustment needed when this kind of things happening but the hand-wringing from one side and doom mongering from the other side doesn't help, but it's a forum so all opinions are welcome.

The one thing I do believe is that the board will back Selles because I don't think they'd be silly enough to risk the fan backlash if they don't.
 
Have a read of this. I think he's nailed it.


My thoughts are that the majority of fans against the new appointment are from the older generation (no offence intended).
Football has moved on, and it's moved on very quickly in the past 5-10years.

There's a lot of our fanbase who think football is still played with fast wingers down the flanks to whip balls into a target man - "gerrit forrard!".
How many times do you hear groans in the crowd when after 3 or 4 passes into midfield, it eventually comes back to the GK to try and start again. It's all about the press now, and how to beat that press whether going through it, or over it.

Gone are the days of an Overmars, Giggs or Beckham type winger. The best "wingers" these days are Salah, Foden, Grealish etc. these aren't "wingers" as we used to know them, but they play out wide, where wingers used to play. But they don't hug the line like days of old, they drift all over the place. They're hybrid players that operate out wide, as an attacking midfielder and even as strikers.

That's just a couple of examples as to how the game has evolved on the pitch... off the pitch it's evolved too. It's data driven. The United buzzword for this is "AI". This has scared the shit out of our older fans - "what's wrong wi sendin a bluddy scout to gu an watch um?"

When they say AI, they mean data driven transfers. They'll input key stats into the system and tweak it to suit the type of player they need.
Do people think that the Leicester scouts just randomly turned up at a Le Havre game and luckily stumbled across Mahrez? Did Brentford just randomly bump into Mbuemo in the Troyes town centre? Brighton have picked up Barco, Mac Allister and Buonanotte as youngsters from Argentina. They won't have scouts just sat watching games over there hoping to find a gem - they'll gather the data then visit when it seems worthwhile.

I think the fans who are dead against this shift are more scared than disappointed. It's outside their comfort zone. As the article above states - are there any other clubs so reliant on having staff who "get the club"? Maybe it's that mentality that's held us back all these years 🤷‍♂️

¡Vamos, hagámoslo!
I'm defo the older generation (68) but in my experience of people I know and have discussed with during the season and discussed excessively over the last week I'd say it 40% on the Wilder fence and 60% for change as a constant since January
I have found that the abuse and even hatred spewed at me on SM for voicing my opinion is ALL from people under 40 and over 20 - so my perception is its the mid range where the biggest split is.
 
Not sure I share your view that people are trying to describe this as a massive failure. There will always be those extremes but I'm not getting that from the majority on here.

I will hold my hands up and admit that after the rumours hit, I spent the days looking for reasons why such a monumental decision was made. There are many that have been added on here but although I didn't particularly want him to go, I'm not fighting the board for him to stay.

Some of that is due to the fact that although 92 points was great, I didn't enjoy last season. The performances were mostly mediocre, it always felt like we were waiting to click, never got a sense of team stability on a style of play or best 11 etc.

I agree with OP that 92 points doesn't paint the full picture of the season.

I'm certainly not looking to shit on last season or call it a complete failure, but we didn't achieve our end-goal, I didn't enjoy watching most of it, and I was quite frustrated by a lot of things that felt in the managers control.

Wilder was the best manager I've ever seen without question but not last years version unfortunately.
I've been a fan of Selles for a few years, I can absolutely see why he's an attractive prospect. I can also understand why Wilder was sacked, in football nowadays you can get sacked when hitting par, and you can even get sacked when exceeding expectations.

I didn't enjoy aspects of last season either. The atmosphere at the games was mostly terrible. It felt to me that many fans felt entitled; rather than us performing well at our natural level, people were sat, arms folded, waiting for us to blow away 95% of the opposition. I felt elated in many games where we struggled over the line, whereas others thought we should be better.

The OP is trying to do what many of here have been doing most of the season, implying that we should be far better than we are. They know obvious changes that would make us miles better, Wilder and Knill are just too stupid/stubborn/self-obsessed/corrupt to make them. (Yes, all those words have been used multiple times). All season, fans saying they hate our players and manager, constantly slagging them off. It's not the majority, but it's a loud minority.

Third biggest budget, squad in a shambles, and we finished third comfortably and was in the battle for top two until late on - BUT we should've finished top two if Wilder could make some obvious tactical changes. I just don't get it.
 
Have a read of this. I think he's nailed it.


My thoughts are that the majority of fans against the new appointment are from the older generation (no offence intended).
Football has moved on, and it's moved on very quickly in the past 5-10years.

There's a lot of our fanbase who think football is still played with fast wingers down the flanks to whip balls into a target man - "gerrit forrard!".
How many times do you hear groans in the crowd when after 3 or 4 passes into midfield, it eventually comes back to the GK to try and start again. It's all about the press now, and how to beat that press whether going through it, or over it.

Gone are the days of an Overmars, Giggs or Beckham type winger. The best "wingers" these days are Salah, Foden, Grealish etc. these aren't "wingers" as we used to know them, but they play out wide, where wingers used to play. But they don't hug the line like days of old, they drift all over the place. They're hybrid players that operate out wide, as an attacking midfielder and even as strikers.

That's just a couple of examples as to how the game has evolved on the pitch... off the pitch it's evolved too. It's data driven. The United buzzword for this is "AI". This has scared the shit out of our older fans - "what's wrong wi sendin a bluddy scout to gu an watch um?"

When they say AI, they mean data driven transfers. They'll input key stats into the system and tweak it to suit the type of player they need.
Do people think that the Leicester scouts just randomly turned up at a Le Havre game and luckily stumbled across Mahrez? Did Brentford just randomly bump into Mbuemo in the Troyes town centre? Brighton have picked up Barco, Mac Allister and Buonanotte as youngsters from Argentina. They won't have scouts just sat watching games over there hoping to find a gem - they'll gather the data then visit when it seems worthwhile.

I think the fans who are dead against this shift are more scared than disappointed. It's outside their comfort zone. As the article above states - are there any other clubs so reliant on having staff who "get the club"? Maybe it's that mentality that's held us back all these years 🤷‍♂️

¡Vamos, hagámoslo!
Nailed it pal.
 
My only slight problem with it is that Wilder for the most part last season played 4-2-3-1 so we didn't play with the Giggs, Beckhams, Overmars type.

Which is kind of my point.

The 2 wide players in the 3 behind the striker aren't the old style wingers. Hamer couldn't be a 1990's winger for example, he can operate well on the left in the modern day.
To counter myself however - Rak-Sakyi, Brereton-Diaz and Brooks can all play "hug the touchline". But they were rarely utilised in that way
 
All I've read pretty much everywhere since it was announced that Wilder has gone/was going is that the owners are mad to sack him because he got us to 92 points last season. The new manager allegedly won't get us to 92 points again as only Wilder could achieve this.

I'm going to call b/s on this myth.

We were inconsistent all season and (play offs aside), we only put in a decent performance over 90 minutes in a handful of matches. In the remainder we were either good half/bad half or poor altogther. We ground out results and relied heavily on luck. It wasn't good management or tactical nuance that won a lot of these games, it was luck. That luck ran out towards the end of the season.

In the last ten games of the season we won four, drew two and lost four. We only won two of our last seven league matches.

Wilder showed no sign of changing his methods.

To say we won't get 92 points again is arguably accurate as the odds are that Wilder himself wouldn't get 92 points again. There is no way that we could play another entire season again in this manner and expect to fluke our way to results through luck again. It's a miracle that we got that amount playing the way we did last season.

"But Wilder would change the way we play next season."

Really? Then why didn't he last season?

"He didn't have the players he needed to suit his tactics."

Then change the tactics to suit what you have and he had January to address this where he was backed by the owners, but he didn't.

I'm sick to death of reading about the 92 points without people acknowledging the poor form at the end of the season and the poor performances all season.

I can handle not getting to 92 points again next season if it means no more disjointed, inconsistent performances and no more square pegs in round holes. We have a far better chance of going up and staying up by playing well than we do by grinding out undeserved results playing crap football with central midfielders and strikers on the wings.

Other fans will only see the final league table and think we're mad. They didn't watch the crap football that we had to watch to get there. Just like some of our fans are judging Selles on results only. They don't tell the whole story and don't entirely define a manager.

Wilder wasn't "sacked" because he didn't get us promoted. He was "sacked" because of everything else.

If you're going to keep quoting 92 points then at least be honest and acknowledge how we got to 92 points and the poor performances and negative tactics throughout the season getting there that continued all the way to the last game of the season.
Exactly my thoughts.
 
The OP is trying to do what many of here have been doing most of the season, implying that we should be far better than we are. They know obvious changes that would make us miles better, Wilder and Knill are just too stupid/stubborn/self-obsessed/corrupt to make them. (Yes, all those words have been used multiple times). All season, fans saying they hate our players and manager, constantly slagging them off. It's not the majority, but it's a loud minority.

Third biggest budget, squad in a shambles, and we finished third comfortably and was in the battle for top two until late on - BUT we should've finished top two if Wilder could make some obvious tactical changes. I just don't get it.
If they are saying we should have been far better, I agree. We didn't perform to our potential last season, or at least I'd hope that wasn't our potential.

Not sure I'm reading OPs post as a dig at Wilder or tactics but as a dig at fans who blindly suggest 92 points is the only story from last season, your post on seeing the negatives from last season means it probably wasn't aimed at you.

Share your frustration on fans being hugely negative though.
 
If they are saying we should have been far better, I agree. We didn't perform to our potential last season, or at least I'd hope that wasn't our potential.

Not sure I'm reading OPs post as a dig at Wilder or tactics but as a dig at fans who blindly suggest 92 points is the only story from last season, your post on seeing the negatives from last season means it probably wasn't aimed at you.

Share your frustration on fans being hugely negative though.
Did any team perform to their potential last season? I think Farke is a great manager, but they threw away plenty of points last season unnecessarily.

Playing to your potential is incredibly rare imo, we did it for a bit in Wilder's first spell, can't remember another time we have.
 
Did any team perform to their potential last season? I think Farke is a great manager, but they threw away plenty of points last season unnecessarily.

Playing to your potential is incredibly rare imo, we did it for a bit in Wilder's first spell, can't remember another time we have.
Are you talking in terms of points or performances? I would say the likes of Bristol City and Millwall exceeded their potential.
 
Are you talking in terms of points or performances? I would say the likes of Bristol City and Millwall exceeded their potential.
Millwall came on strong late, but the same squad earlier in the season was in a relegation battle, so you could say they didn't play to their potential throughout the season (although they clearly exceeded expectations). Bristol City gave us two battles in the league season, then collapsed in the play offs.

I suppose I'm being pedantic, by playing to their potential I thinking that nobody could possibly have gotten more out of that squad of players. Probably talking shite at this point.
 
Just not true, sorry. Chelsea under Mourinho, Burnley under Parker this season? It was sustainable for us and delivered us a large points total. Plenty of teams are successful playing for fine margins.
The difference being, Burnley upped their game when needed and when put under pressure. We didn't. We were the epitome of a flat-track bully, but when the pressure came, I'm afraid we were found wanting
 
Not based on statistics, XG, or any of that nonsense ;), but based on what I saw with my own eyes, we weren't one of the top two sides in the league. We were probably the third best, possibly the fourth, to the naked eye, and if we were to play last season again, I think we'd end up with around 75 points. What we were good at was beating sides outside of the top six, which, in all honesty, is usually good enough for promotion. Wilder did a good job last season, but there was more in the squad that he got out of it.
 
All I've read pretty much everywhere since it was announced that Wilder has gone/was going is that the owners are mad to sack him because he got us to 92 points last season. The new manager allegedly won't get us to 92 points again as only Wilder could achieve this.

I'm going to call b/s on this myth.

We were inconsistent all season and (play offs aside), we only put in a decent performance over 90 minutes in a handful of matches. In the remainder we were either good half/bad half or poor altogther. We ground out results and relied heavily on luck. It wasn't good management or tactical nuance that won a lot of these games, it was luck. That luck ran out towards the end of the season.

In the last ten games of the season we won four, drew two and lost four. We only won two of our last seven league matches.

Wilder showed no sign of changing his methods.

To say we won't get 92 points again is arguably accurate as the odds are that Wilder himself wouldn't get 92 points again. There is no way that we could play another entire season again in this manner and expect to fluke our way to results through luck again. It's a miracle that we got that amount playing the way we did last season.

"But Wilder would change the way we play next season."

Really? Then why didn't he last season?

"He didn't have the players he needed to suit his tactics."

Then change the tactics to suit what you have and he had January to address this where he was backed by the owners, but he didn't.

I'm sick to death of reading about the 92 points without people acknowledging the poor form at the end of the season and the poor performances all season.

I can handle not getting to 92 points again next season if it means no more disjointed, inconsistent performances and no more square pegs in round holes. We have a far better chance of going up and staying up by playing well than we do by grinding out undeserved results playing crap football with central midfielders and strikers on the wings.

Other fans will only see the final league table and think we're mad. They didn't watch the crap football that we had to watch to get there. Just like some of our fans are judging Selles on results only. They don't tell the whole story and don't entirely define a manager.

Wilder wasn't "sacked" because he didn't get us promoted. He was "sacked" because of everything else.

If you're going to keep quoting 92 points then at least be honest and acknowledge how we got to 92 points and the poor performances and negative tactics throughout the season getting there that continued all the way to the last game of the season.
“Luck!” Really? You believe that accumulating 92 points across a full season in arguably the most competitive league in the world is down to luck? You talk about calling time on “the 92 point myth”. It’s not a myth, it’s a fact. Your evidence for calling time is your personal view of what constitutes “luck.” Sorry, not convinced.
 

“Luck!” Really? You believe that accumulating 92 points across a full season in arguably the most competitive league in the world is down to luck? You talk about calling time on “the 92 point myth”. It’s not a myth, it’s a fact. Your evidence for calling time is your personal view of what constitutes “luck.” Sorry, not convinced.
I'm not saying all of it was luck, but there were a lot of games which we won that we shouldn't have and didn't deserve to. Luck played a part in the final outcome. We ground out more results than Leeds or Burnley had to and made a lot of games very difficult for ourselves. That was my main point. If we played the same way next season as we did last season then I highly doubt we'd equal that tally and would fall short.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom