Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
I've absolutely no problem with anyone having a different opinion but some are reacting like hes already fucked up big time against Bournemouth. presuming hell start.
Arrested. Tried. Hung. Before committing any offence.
Not quite sure how Lundstram is the answer to fast sides that break well??I think we'd all take a 0-0 on Saturday.
The last three times we turned to Lundstram:
Brentford 3-2 away win
Reading 2-0 away win
Bristol C 0-1 away defeat
There's obviously more behind those results (he was subbed at half time at Reading, at 0-0). It was 2-2 when he went off at Brentford. At Bristol City we conceded a late goal following a corner.
Nevertheless, it's not been a disaster when he's started, and there are reasons for not being too adventurous from the start in our opening game, away at a very fast side that breaks well.
Not quite sure how Lundstram is the answer to fast sides that break well??
It's more the contrast between last year and this. Last year he looked well off the pace as we were promoted from championship. How is he therefore now in contention for s starting role in the premier league?
And it's not just that, it's that his presence in the side reflects a change of system. If he's in, we're a flat midfield, we don't play our usual way.
It's the direct contrast between last season we were dynamic, we had Mark Duffy, we were at it, playing our usual way. Now, Lundstram, without wanting to adhere to scapegoating of a specific individual reflects the total opposite to Duffy and that style of play.
After all, that's what we all want to see: Tuftyball taken to the big boys, starting with Bournemouth. There's a good chance it would work against Bournemouth too. Lundstram reflects a system where we play it safe instead.
Oooh ahhhhh. We just want hard tacklers in midfield. Actual football talent? Not interested pal. Wheyyy big hard tackles. Tek that ya cunt.We have always had whipping boys at the Lane. John Gannon springs to mind as a player that strongly divided opinion. Bob Booker ,initially, was another. And so was Chris Basham, again initially.
Now its Lundstrums turn.
If he can put a few more tackles like the one he did on (wonder kid/sun shines out of his arse) Jack Grealish maybe opinions will become less polarised.
“Oh yes remember that tackle oh yes who needs a number 10 playmaker when we can purr lunny on so we can graft and hoof our way to the top GERRA FOORRRIN AND GERRABART STOP FANNYING ABART WITH THIS TIPPY TAPPY SHITE AND FOoKIN SLAM EM FOoKIN SHOOOT!!!”We have always had whipping boys at the Lane. John Gannon springs to mind as a player that strongly divided opinion. Bob Booker ,initially, was another. And so was Chris Basham, again initially.
Now its Lundstrums turn.
If he can put a few more tackles like the one he did on (wonder kid/sun shines out of his arse) Jack Grealish maybe opinions will become less polarised.
My point was he's slow & always appears the last of the midfield 3 to get back behind the ball when the opposition attacks.It's mainly an extra body across midfield that helps covering ground and protect the defence.
“Oh I do rate him ah Lunny”“Oh yes remember that tackle oh yes who needs a number 10 playmaker when we can purr lunny on so we can graft and hoof our way to the top GERRA FOORRRIN AND GERRABART STOP FANNYING ABART WITH THIS TIPPY TAPPY SHITE AND FOoKIN SLAM EM FOoKIN SHOOOT!!!”![]()
It seems that you (and to be fair a few others like you) feel that you know more about football and football management than Chris Wilder and Alan Knill. Interesting, but wouldn't it be better to wait and see how it pans out before you try and secure your position at top coach in SY, I suspect that you might have a battle on your hands.
Agree with much of your post but it's the first match of the season, NOT a six pointer! Pretty sure Duffy's done in Wilder's eyes so time to move on I'm afraid.The 3-5-1-1 system is the problem. We need three mobile players with quick feet, all interchangeable capable of getting up and down the field, quick minds and able to get a foot in. The only 1 of the three yesterday who meets those requirements IMO is Fleck. Morrison has the ability to play there but is not up to speed.
Yesterday Reims did what the better teams in the Championship did last season when we adopted this. They press Fleck and Norwood and with Lundstram back there as well it all becomes cluttered and we resort to hoof ball.
For that reason I don't know why we are experimenting again at the beginning of the season. 3-4-1-2 is our formation. 3-4-2-1 being an option away. We have the players that fit these systems. Duffy is a miss but Freeman, Mcg and Robinson are all able to play 10. We have looked much better pre season when a 10 has been on the field but thats has usually been after an hour. I don't recall us starting a pre season game 3-4-1-2. I could be wrong.
Bournemouth away will be a benchmark as to how we are going to fare this season. I put them amongst 6 or 7 teams who will be battling to avoid the drop. For me its a 6 pointer and I'd rather we give it a go and pick a system that suits the players we currently have.
It seems that you (and to be fair a few others like you) feel that you know more about football and football management than Chris Wilder and Alan Knill. Interesting, but wouldn't it be better to wait and see how it pans out before you try and secure your position at top coach in SY, I suspect that you might have a batt
My point was he's slow & always appears the last of the midfield 3 to get back behind the ball when the opposition attacks.
I honestly hope he proves everyone wrong & I really tried to get behind his selection yesterday but the longer the game went on the harder it became.
only wilder and knilly know .. it is a cunning plan.. IWWTI don’t like to be negative but how is Lundstram even being considered for a place in our squad/lineup when his influence on the team is so poor. We cannot afford to play him and then realise this after 2 or 3 poor games
Some of you can sugar coat it as much as you want, Lundstrum should be nowhere near the first team, especially in the top tier.
I don't like to criticise our players unless it is necessary but Lundstrum being in or around the first team picture one week before the start of this season is ridiculous.
He wasn't good enough last season or the season before in the Championship and he's not now. Do we have to go through this farce every season at this time of year. CW plays him, the team play very poorly and lose, a couple of games later CW realises this and brings Duffy back in, team start playing well and we win.
Substitute the name Duffy for Freeman this time aroundMaybe this time Duffy won't be coming back though.
A highlight of mine I saw on VIP Blades once was Londstrome. No satire.Different ways of spelling Lundstram
Lundstram
Lundstrum
Lindstum
Lunny
Lungs Gone
Lunderbar
Lunt of the litter
A highlight of mine I saw on VIP Blades once was Londstrome. No satire.
And for your record, I don't 'hate' any Sheffield United player. It's ridiculous to suggest we do.
Loonstrum is one I've missed out actually. Spotted on Wilders Army
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?