Selly
Ask me about Updog...
That many???“I went forward in time to see how many future outcomes of our upcoming game with Wolves there were”
”how many did you see?”
“14,000,605”
”how many do we win?”
View attachment 173869
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
That many???“I went forward in time to see how many future outcomes of our upcoming game with Wolves there were”
”how many did you see?”
“14,000,605”
”how many do we win?”
View attachment 173869
Eyup S2,
Neither Roygbiv or I managed to see the Arsenal game and it doesn't look like there's much meaningful to be drawn from it apart from "oh look, we're still rubbish", so instead we thought - with it being SPOOKY SZN - we'd take a trip back in time to an alternate reality where several things went a little bit differently to how they did in this one...
Or you can skip all that and just get to the Wolves preview at about 19 minutes. Cheers!
Eyup S2,
Neither Roygbiv or I managed to see the Arsenal game and it doesn't look like there's much meaningful to be drawn from it apart from "oh look, we're still rubbish", so instead we thought - with it being SPOOKY SZN - we'd take a trip back in time to an alternate reality where several things went a little bit differently to how they did in this one...
Or you can skip all that and just get to the Wolves preview at about 19 minutes. Cheers!
Eyup S2,
Neither Roygbiv or I managed to see the Arsenal game and it doesn't look like there's much meaningful to be drawn from it apart from "oh look, we're still rubbish", so instead we thought - with it being SPOOKY SZN - we'd take a trip back in time to an alternate reality where several things went a little bit differently to how they did in this one...
Or you can skip all that and just get to the Wolves preview at about 19 minutes. Cheers!
A great pod by two clever twats
Didn’t work for me. Too far fetched.
You’ve got McBurnie scoring a PL goal in open play.
Eyup S2,
Neither Roygbiv or I managed to see the Arsenal game and it doesn't look like there's much meaningful to be drawn from it apart from "oh look, we're still rubbish", so instead we thought - with it being SPOOKY SZN - we'd take a trip back in time to an alternate reality where several things went a little bit differently to how they did in this one...
Or you can skip all that and just get to the Wolves preview at about 19 minutes. Cheers!
This was a borderline distressing lesson.
Haha, oh I like Radiohead, but they don't fuck with my head like that!Radiohead are one of the biggest selling artists in the world for a reason. People like misery
Weerz pod?
I don’t want to drive home until it’s on my streaming service but I also really want to leave work.
A welcome pod for the presenters, being able to discuss the positive aspects of a Blades win, at last.Thanks for the pod.
I think the McAtee sub is explicable because if we take Heckey at his word he was going to do the swap at half time anyway, and if you are, there isn't any reason to play 90 seconds with a man down.
It also makes sense from the perspective of a slow start and better second half, because we are at our worst in the second half, and this seemed to be more of a strategised 'keep it tight 1st half and go for it second', where you take off your worst player (Brewster) and have more chance of pulling something off with a better player replacing them.
Thanks for the pod.
I think the McAtee sub is explicable because if we take Heckey at his word he was going to do the swap at half time anyway, and if you are, there isn't any reason to play 90 seconds with a man down.
It also makes sense from the perspective of a slow start and better second half, because we are at our worst in the second half, and this seemed to be more of a strategised 'keep it tight 1st half and go for it second', where you take off your worst player (Brewster) and have more chance of pulling something off with a better player replacing them.
Easy to say with hindsight - imagine the blowback if we had played out the last 90 seconds with 10 men and Wolves had scored...Probably didn’t articulate myself properly on this but my thinking was that by making the sub then, we now could only stop the game to make subs twice more in the second half. Whereas if he’d waited til halftime to make the change, we’d still have three potential sub “slots” as the halftime one doesn’t count towards them.
It’s a minor thing but as I said on there it just capped off a very frustrating first half. And with our injury record it’s not unlikely that we could’ve found ourselves in a situation where we finish the game with 10 players because we couldn’t make any more subs. Just seemed like poor in-game management to me in a league where we need every little edge possible.
I stand by it tbh (did say as much at the time to me dad who I was grumpily making this point to). Brewster was a nonfactor that first half so don’t see how Wolves suddenly become more of a threat if we play out the last 60-90s of the half with ten men. Plus the longer games have gone on this season the worse we’ve looked as we tire - I’d rather have kept the sub opportunity in the pocket.Easy to say with hindsight - imagine the blowback if we had played out the last 90 seconds with 10 men and Wolves had scored...
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?