Archer buyback fee

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

On papertalk on ss, said that villa have to sell this summer even though they will get large amount of money for champions league. Sounds like they are definitely close on Psr and that's probably why they want them to increase limit for last year. Can't see them keeping archer
 

Do Villa have to buy him back? If I was Villa, I’d do what Liverpool did with Brewster…….“You’re alright United, you keep him”.

Unless they can somehow buy him back and sell him straightaway for a profit, then I can’t see why they’d want him back. But after this season I’m struggling to see how they’d manage to pull that one off.
We’ve essentially paid £6m for Archer for one season.
 
Its been well documented for the last 9 months that Villa HAVE to buy him back if we are relegated
Its not rocket science

Well I didn’t know, hence why I asked. I’m not sure why you felt the need to respond in that manner.
 
We are getting money back as it is a buyback deal
Because he doesn’t understand he’s simply using a years amortisation charge. Unless anyone actually knows the actual transfer fees both in and out, it’s a guess. Some automatically plump for the worst scenario though.

When he signed most reports said he was costing us £18m. I see it’s now crept up to £20m for some and we’re selling him back for £15.5m 😕
 

Because he doesn’t understand he’s simply using a years amortisation charge. Unless anyone actually knows the actual transfer fees both in and out, it’s a guess. Some automatically plump for the worst scenario though.

When he signed most reports said he was costing us £18m. I see it’s now crept up to £20m and we’re selling him back for £15.5m. 😕
Some in here like to exaggerate things
 
14 mill would be a lot for Boro, but as a kind of swap, would make a lot of sense for them. Rogers may have a higher ceiling, but at this stage I'm their careers on this division, I think Archer would have a much bigger impact.
 
Sure last year it was buy for 18mill and villa had an option to buy him back for x amount if they required him back

It’s a mandatory buy back clause that came into effect after we were relegated.

They HAVE to buy him back.

(Unless the whole deal is renegotiated)

 
Asked to confirm if Archer was returning, Emery said: "Yes at the beginning he's coming back. We are analysing [players] and we are going to meet with (owners) Nassef (Sawiris) and Wes Edens).

 
A player can be bought and sold twice in the same transfer window. It nearly happened last season when Citeh signed Haaland. Allegedly Real Madrid were going to trigger his release fee and buy him off Citeh before a ball was kicked.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom