I guess this is correct, too both felt they knew the best way forward. Both didn't agree with other. I guess what frustrates me is that Wilder's way certainly up until this season has worked for us. We are now likely to go into more uncharted territory and no guarantee of success. Although Slavisa has a record at Champ level if appointed.Absolutely. It was always destined for divorce, although you could say that for any manager/owner relationship. This was a dysfunctional relationship from the start of the sole ownership. I imagine this will become more clear with the future direction of the club, starting with the remit of the new head coach (or de facto head coach). It's not a matter of right or wrong (some members seem determined to turn it into this) but of different ways of doing things.
On the contrary I think he did want to carry on but just didn't see how he could make it work and the relationship between him and Prince was being tested this season. (Not just results on the pitch)His resignations show he was no longer committed to the club, for whatever reasons. I've read on here that began in our first season in the Championship, over what l'm not sure.
There have been PR exercises from both sides. From PA himself and from those close to CW. I'd suggest if we actually knew the truth and were able to take an unbiased view - unlikely - we'd see plenty of red herrings from both sides.
I reckon your right in a way too. I think the thing we should all take from it is that it was very much a "mutual agreement." Wilder couldn't see a way forward neither could the prince despite them both wishing to remain in place.
I think that's why there is this talk of him coming back, because if the Prince changed tact and suited more of Wilders wishes then yes he would consider coming back. But I don't see that happening at all! I don't think Wilder is of course being considered either by the board, which is also understandable as he's left!