Towards the end of the month.Does anyone know when our new kit is released?
I've got an excitable 5 year old asking me every day....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Towards the end of the month.Does anyone know when our new kit is released?
I've got an excitable 5 year old asking me every day....
Sportpesa replacing Chang on Everton's kits next season.
Yep.
West Brom have changed to a Chinese landscaping company though so at present, we're still at the same number. Be interesting to see come August when all new shirts are out.
Mansion - Bournemouth, Crystal Palace - Didn't know this was a betting company
Dafabet - Burnley, Sunderland, Blackburn
SportPesa - Hull - Who?
Bet365 - Stoke
BetEast - Swansea - Who?
138.com - Watford - Who?
Uk-K8.com - West Brom - Who?
888 Sport - Birmingham, Brentford, Nottm Forest, Preston
Tempobet - Burton - Who?
32Red - Leeds
Smarkets - QPR - Who?
Spin-Win - Bolton - Who?
Betdaq - Charlton - Who?
Energy Bet - Leyton Orient - Who?
Ladbrokes - Notts County
Such is my extensive online betting knowledge.
Who's it going to be for us, then? Coral? Paddypower? Jackpot Joy? Mecca Bingo?
I detest all the online betting companies because they make money out of other people's misery. I can't understand why it's even legal; when I was a CAB worker a few centuries ago gambling debts were not enforceable in law and I'd like to think that's still the case today.
If people want to go into the bookie's and have a bet that's one thing; being allowed (nay, encouraged) to gamble your house away over the phone is summat else entirely.
If a club can't be sponsored by a tobacco or pornography company I see no reason why they should be allowed to take money from online casinos. Stoke's sellout, in having Bet365 not only on their shirts but in the name of their stadium as well, must be just about the shoddiest in the history of British football.
I detest all the online betting companies because they make money out of other people's misery. I can't understand why it's even legal; when I was a CAB worker a few centuries ago gambling debts were not enforceable in law and I'd like to think that's still the case today.
If people want to go into the bookie's and have a bet that's one thing; being allowed (nay, encouraged) to gamble your house away over the phone is summat else entirely.
If a club can't be sponsored by a tobacco or pornography company I see no reason why they should be allowed to take money from online casinos. Stoke's sellout, in having Bet365 not only on their shirts but in the name of their stadium as well, must be just about the shoddiest in the history of British football.
Yeah, I'd pretty much agree with that. I've really never gotten on with online betting due to the fact that you have to deposit a tenner in order to bet (with the ones I've used anyway). If I have a flutter it's a couple of quid, so chucking a tenner encourages me to bet more than I normally would, hence pissing away £7 or £8 more than I usually would.
Plus I like using the dinky little pens and filling the slip in.
However, I've known people who end up scrounging money off their nan because they've pissed wages up the wall on betting (when they really don't earn the wages to be betting in the first place). People sat on their laptop placing in-play bets on the basketball, when they know fuck all about basketball. The fact you can wake up, pick your phone up and chuck £200 on a spin of an online slot without even getting out of bed, is frightening.
Yet every time you stick SkySports on to watch a match, betting is rammed down our throats. The telly ads especially make it look super cool and like it's something that all of us should definitely be doing.
Tacky, controversial, play on peoples misery you say
and yet you like having a flutter
dinky little pens
The fuck is wrong with the dinky pens?![]()
OK, I don't bet at all. So is it alright for me to say it's a mugs' game that makes money from the weakness of vulnerable people?Tacky, controversial, play on peoples misery you say.......and yet you like having a flutter and the dinky little pens.....fucking priceless![]()
Also, the people who own stoke, are the people who own Bet365 (Coates family) so hardly shoddy, just the owner promoting his other business'
I detest all the online betting companies because they make money out of other people's misery. I can't understand why it's even legal; when I was a CAB worker a few centuries ago gambling debts were not enforceable in law and I'd like to think that's still the case today.
If people want to go into the bookie's and have a bet that's one thing; being allowed (nay, encouraged) to gamble your house away over the phone is summat else entirely.
If a club can't be sponsored by a tobacco or pornography company I see no reason why they should be allowed to take money from online casinos. Stoke's sellout, in having Bet365 not only on their shirts but in the name of their stadium as well, must be just about the shoddiest in the history of British football.
Out if interest why tacky and why controversial? Last time I looked gambling is perfectly legal and whether you like it or not a major part of the British culture since the dawn of time is having a flutter.
Perfectly understand those points LDB. But my reasons about it being tacky is that the betting sponsors I've seen (mostly Prem sides) don't fit in with the club colours/design. I reference Newcastle's new kit as an example.
Controversial; more on an ethically perspective. There's much research involved in links between mental health and gambling addiction. I think UK football is saturated with gambling company's involvement. You see betting adverts during the day not 'after the watershed' although I know that may be changing anyway. It's exposure is at a dangerous level imo. And us being sponsored would perpetuate that thought.
Yes of course it's perfectly legal but if adverts each and every second has a Ray Winstone equivalent telling people to go drink constantly I think they'd be cause for concern. I think that way regarding the promotion of gambling and it's dominance within football.
Hope that helps clarify my point!![]()
erfectly understand those points LDB. But my reasons about it being tacky is that the betting sponsors I've seen (mostly Prem sides) don't fit in with the club colours/design. I reference Newcastle's new kit as an example.
In fairness, a Picasso design on your shirt should be pretty classy...I always thought chuppa chumps looked really classy
The Alpharooms sponsorship deal was announced as a three year deal when it as unveiled at the start of last season.
Point out where I've said this.
A £2 acca once every 6 weeks is hardly breaking the bank.
The fuck is wrong with the dinky pens?![]()
My bad Tom it was vegan who mentioned tacky which he has answered above (we shall agree to disagree !) But you did agree with another post who mentioned praying on peoples misery. Again I think we shall agree to disagree![]()
Southampton have gone back to the early 80's. Time for a relaunch of the Ajax Hobbott kit?
View attachment 27402
No!
Don't mind that kit.
It's the crest that So'ton need to sort out. It's a reyt mess.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?