Pig scum mocking Luey Sharp.

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?


itsinyerblood said:
Ah, let me correct your rather sloppy understanding of what constitutes forum discussion.....I comment on what a poster says, while you seem to think I need to know something about them. That's how it works, haven't you learnt a thing?
Click to expand...


I've learned you're exceedingly tedious and pompous in the extreme.
 
itsinyerblood said:
I can only hope you're joking, otherwise you deserve to be removed from this forum.
Click to expand...


I've not insulted anyone, I've basically said that it doesn't matter what your colour, creed, gender or sexual preferences are, you are safe.
But if you're a stupid, illiterate, idle, criminal, drug addicted fuckwit, you're going to end up in a large hole in the ground
 
Topplayersleave said:
I've not insulted anyone, I've basically said that it doesn't matter what your colour, creed, gender or sexual preferences are, you are safe.
But if you're a stupid, illiterate, idle, criminal, drug addicted fuckwit, you're going to end up in a large hole in the ground
Click to expand...

That's exactly the rationale that the nazis used with those who didn't meet their criteria of what constituted a worthy human being. I think you need expert psychological help.
 
There has to be consequences for being a dick.

The more of a dick you are, the more severe the consequence, and the more likely you are of having the shit kicked out of you.

Use they're, their or there incorrectly, get called a twat.

Call someone a twat, potentially get a slap.

Slap someone, you might get your nose broken.

Use the death of someone's child to insult them, you can't complain when someone snaps your arms and legs.
 
itsinyerblood said:
That's exactly the rationale that the nazis used with those who didn't meet their criteria of what constituted a worthy human being. I think you need expert psychological help.
Click to expand...


No, the Nazi's were a right wing party who targeted a certain section of society.
I'm targeting all of society
Just because someone is stupid it doesn't necessarily mean they die
Just because someone is illiterate it doesn't necessarily mean they die
Just because someone is a criminal it doesn't necessarily mean they die

But if they tick all the boxes on my list, they're gone, and nobody will miss them because the chances are their entire family will be gone as well
 
Topplayersleave said:
No, the Nazi's were a right wing party who targeted a certain section of society.
I'm targeting all of society
Just because someone is stupid it doesn't necessarily mean they die
Just because someone is illiterate it doesn't necessarily mean they die
Just because someone is a criminal it doesn't necessarily mean they die

But if they tick all the boxes on my list, they're gone, and nobody will miss them because the chances are their entire family will be gone as well
Click to expand...

You really do have life sorted, don't you? Either that or you're someone who has the deepest psychological problems imaginable. My advice, seek help...quickly!
 
itsinyerblood said:
You really do have life sorted, don't you? Either that or you're someone who has the deepest psychological problems imaginable. My advice, seek help...quickly!
Click to expand...


It's like Logans Run mate, only you don't have to die at age 30
From the age of 14 you start to score points, if you get to aged 30 and achieve minimum standard you get to live.
This would be backdated so that we could get a head start in eliminating the fucking pond life that roam our streets
 
They're all out tonight
I thought the fella's address had been posted & is common knowledge. If you want harm to come to him, arms broken, nose broken, whatever, go round. Don't sit at home wishing it....
I've been clear - I think this is all nonsense & no one should harm him. Scenarios like this are a tradegy waiting to happen. It's a No from me....
 
I thought it was equally as tacky and twattish when they were picking on wilders daughter
Was dozens of them at it then though
 
itsinyerblood said:
And of course, you'd be the person who decides who lives or dies. You sound remarkably similar to the President of the Philippines, Rodrigo Duterte. Apart from his title he's as much a thug as any of those he considers as worthless as you do.
Click to expand...
It seems you may be reading mainly Western media. You know, the one that until recently was happy for Saudi Arabia to live by medieval values because the West dislikes Iran more and quite likes affordable oil.

Rodrigo Duterte is extremely popular in the Philippines and to understand why you need to understand the issues in the country. Western standards do not apply to a country which has poverty the West doesn't have.

Duterte used to be Mayor of Davao, which is bigger than Manila. When he got the post, Davao was described as being as lawless and crime ridden as Nicaragua. Today, Davao is in the top 10 safest places in the world.

Philippines has a huge drug problem where lives are ruined and families lives ruined. All the West reports is some crude death toll because it suits the Duterte Harry narrative. Duterte is just as well known for opening rehabilitation sites for drug users, for being supportive of LBGTQ rights, for being the first on the scene in natural disasters, for compassionately personally visiting the families of fallen soldiers, for acknowledging the abuses and plight of Overseas foreign workers, for the poor, for the repressed, for being the only one to tackle the traffic issues in Manila and the only one to recognise the drugs trade is what drags the country down.

But that doesn't suit the image the West wants to perpetuate. The killings in the Western media, how much do they make of the fact these pushers get killed because they resist arrest or attack the Police? How much is made of the rehabilitation programs? For those that die, it's usually self inflicted. They have every chance to not be in that situation and drag down an exponential amount more.

Duterte is not perfect but he gets results and gets his hands dirty where others won't. He's a man of simple means who shuns the riches of some of his predecessors. The Western media has done a great job of demonising him but for those of us who visit the country frequently and see with our own eyes his impact the Philippines is a far safer country than it was before him.
 
Champagneblade said:
It seems you may be reading mainly Western media. You know, the one that until recently was happy for Saudi Arabia to live by medieval values because the West dislikes Iran more and quite likes affordable oil.

Rodrigo Duterte is extremely popular in the Philippines and to understand why you need to understand the issues in the country. Western standards do not apply to a country which has poverty the West doesn't have.

Duterte used to be Mayor of Davao, which is bigger than Manila. When he got the post, Davao was described as being as lawless and crime ridden as Nicaragua. Today, Davao is in the top 10 safest places in the world.

Philippines has a huge drug problem where lives are ruined and families lives ruined. All the West reports is some crude death toll because it suits the Duterte Harry narrative. Duterte is just as well known for opening rehabilitation sites for drug users, for being supportive of LBGTQ rights, for being the first on the scene in natural disasters, for compassionately personally visiting the families of fallen soldiers, for acknowledging the abuses and plight of Overseas foreign workers, for the poor, for the repressed, for being the only one to tackle the traffic issues in Manila and the only one to recognise the drugs trade is what drags the country down.

But that doesn't suit the image the West wants to perpetuate. The killings in the Western media, how much do they make of the fact these pushers get killed because they resist arrest or attack the Police? How much is made of the rehabilitation programs? For those that die, it's usually self inflicted. They have every chance to not be in that situation and drag down an exponential amount more.

Duterte is not perfect but he gets results and gets his hands dirty where others won't. He's a man of simple means who shuns the riches of some of his predecessors. The Western media has done a great job of demonising him but for those of us who visit the country frequently and see with our own eyes his impact the Philippines is a far safer country than it was before him.
Click to expand...


Cant wait for the comeback to this one!
 

Champagneblade said:
It seems you may be reading mainly Western media. You know, the one that until recently was happy for Saudi Arabia to live by medieval values because the West dislikes Iran more and quite likes affordable oil.

Rodrigo Duterte is extremely popular in the Philippines and to understand why you need to understand the issues in the country. Western standards do not apply to a country which has poverty the West doesn't have.

Duterte used to be Mayor of Davao, which is bigger than Manila. When he got the post, Davao was described as being as lawless and crime ridden as Nicaragua. Today, Davao is in the top 10 safest places in the world.

Philippines has a huge drug problem where lives are ruined and families lives ruined. All the West reports is some crude death toll because it suits the Duterte Harry narrative. Duterte is just as well known for opening rehabilitation sites for drug users, for being supportive of LBGTQ rights, for being the first on the scene in natural disasters, for compassionately personally visiting the families of fallen soldiers, for acknowledging the abuses and plight of Overseas foreign workers, for the poor, for the repressed, for being the only one to tackle the traffic issues in Manila and the only one to recognise the drugs trade is what drags the country down.

But that doesn't suit the image the West wants to perpetuate. The killings in the Western media, how much do they make of the fact these pushers get killed because they resist arrest or attack the Police? How much is made of the rehabilitation programs? For those that die, it's usually self inflicted. They have every chance to not be in that situation and drag down an exponential amount more.

Duterte is not perfect but he gets results and gets his hands dirty where others won't. He's a man of simple means who shuns the riches of some of his predecessors. The Western media has done a great job of demonising him but for those of us who visit the country frequently and see with our own eyes his impact the Philippines is a far safer country than it was before him.
Click to expand...

Correct, my understanding of Duterte is based on the UK press, TV news, and American press. Am I right to assume you visit the Philippines regularly?

I think it's a tad understated to refer to Duterte as "not perfect". He's a law unto himself, and if I had the time no doubt I could identify legions of despots throughout history who, apart from the seedier side of their characters, also visited those they regarded as 'worthy' of their attention, or opened hospitals, or chose to behave in ways that were in complete contradiction to the nastier side of their nature. Surrounding RD with all manner of apparently worthy acts doesn't make his 'war on drugs' something that is acceptable. I appreciate that this may not sit easily with your description of RD, but the western press isn't completely wrong.
 
Ball_Sup (Phil) said:
They're all out tonight
I thought the fella's address had been posted & is common knowledge. If you want harm to come to him, arms broken, nose broken, whatever, go round. Don't sit at home wishing it....
I've been clear - I think this is all nonsense & no one should harm him. Scenarios like this are a tradegy waiting to happen. It's a No from me....
Click to expand...

I actually agree with this. Would be nice I someone pulled him on it and made him shit his kacks, but nothing physical.
Hope the report of his parents windows going through are bolox too.
 
knowsnowt said:
Just telling me I can't view it.
Seems strange really that supposedly a lot of them sympathise with Billy yet not publically, but behind a "wall" the public can't view.
I know they're an odd lot but that's especially odd imo. Why all the secrecy over there? Paranoia?
Click to expand...
Actually I can understand not wanting a thread on this subject to be open for public viewing. Anything stupid said by a random poster could land the forum owners in trouble.
 
itsinyerblood said:
Correct, my understanding of Duterte is based on the UK press, TV news, and American press. Am I right to assume you visit the Philippines regularly?

I think it's a tad understated to refer to Duterte as "not perfect". He's a law unto himself, and if I had the time no doubt I could identify legions of despots throughout history who, apart from the seedier side of their characters, also visited those they regarded as 'worthy' of their attention, or opened hospitals, or chose to behave in ways that were in complete contradiction to the nastier side of their nature. Surrounding RD with all manner of apparently worthy acts doesn't make his 'war on drugs' something that is acceptable. I appreciate that this may not sit easily with your description of RD, but the western press isn't completely wrong.
Click to expand...
My wife is from Philippines and I've been there frequently over the past decade, maybe 30 times or more.

I consider myself fortunate enough to have an alternative to Western media and to make my own opinion through first hand experience. And I've changed my mind multiple times on Philppine politics - there are no black and white characters, only grey. Certainly the Western media picks and chooses and is happy to side with the minority and project it as if it were the majority. Of all the points I shared, what gets reported apart from alleged Extra Judicial Killings and calling Obama a son of a bitch? Not much.

Duterte isn't by definition a law unto himself though. He is an elected leader in a democracy. There was no question about him legitimately winning either. He's not some power hungry despot and he's not exercised power any more than his predecessors, far less in the case of some.

He didn't even want to run and frequently comments that he'll happily step aside or shorten his term. It's 6 years maximum in Philippines anyway. It was only in fact the people's support that pushed him to run relatively last minute. The main difference between him and other candidates was simple - at 70 years old, he wants to make the country better. Others wanted to be President.

This is where it gets back to what is acceptable by Western norms doesn't correlate so easily. The war on drugs has casualties it's true. In the main it's those that persist in illegal activities, perpetuate crimes against minors because they are addicted to drugs and those that resist arrest at the same time as shunning help made available. When he came to power 1000s of drug users turned themselves in to rehabilitation centers. How many did that save and where was that story?

Would it be ideal that there were no deaths? Of course. But would you choose the life of a young child or that of someone who rapes and murders a minor because they are under the influence of shabu (the local name for methamphetamine). Unfortunately that is part of the choice that he has to make. It's hard to be the good guy when those are your options.
 
Hamburg Blade said:
Actually I can understand not wanting a thread on this subject to be open for public viewing. Anything stupid said by a random poster could land the forum owners in trouble.
Click to expand...

The main censorship on there is as a result of the advertisers codes of conduct. That's why there's a members only hidden section where anything goes.
 
Champagneblade said:
My wife is from Philippines and I've been there frequently over the past decade, maybe 30 times or more.

I consider myself fortunate enough to have an alternative to Western media and to make my own opinion through first hand experience. And I've changed my mind multiple times on Philppine politics - there are no black and white characters, only grey. Certainly the Western media picks and chooses and is happy to side with the minority and project it as if it were the majority. Of all the points I shared, what gets reported apart from alleged Extra Judicial Killings and calling Obama a son of a bitch? Not much.

Duterte isn't by definition a law unto himself though. He is an elected leader in a democracy. There was no question about him legitimately winning either. He's not some power hungry despot and he's not exercised power any more than his predecessors, far less in the case of some.

He didn't even want to run and frequently comments that he'll happily step aside or shorten his term. It's 6 years maximum in Philippines anyway. It was only in fact the people's support that pushed him to run relatively last minute. The main difference between him and other candidates was simple - at 70 years old, he wants to make the country better. Others wanted to be President.

This is where it gets back to what is acceptable by Western norms doesn't correlate so easily. The war on drugs has casualties it's true. In the main it's those that persist in illegal activities, perpetuate crimes against minors because they are addicted to drugs and those that resist arrest at the same time as shunning help made available. When he came to power 1000s of drug users turned themselves in to rehabilitation centers. How many did that save and where was that story?

Would it be ideal that there were no deaths? Of course. But would you choose the life of a young child or that of someone who rapes and murders a minor because they are under the influence of shabu (the local name for methamphetamine). Unfortunately that is part of the choice that he has to make. It's hard to be the good guy when those are your options.
Click to expand...


And it's not as if that pillar of western democracy the good old US OF A dosent get it's hands dirty in the drugs trade of every nation in central and South America is it. Very easy to pontificate about things one knows little to nothing about especially when it applies to some banana republic because Fox fucking tv says so.
 
diplomat said:
I’m not going in there. . . How on earth could anyone even begin to try and turn it on sharp?
Click to expand...

A Twitter user called SimplySharp retweeted the original disgusting tweet and a pig fan on Owlstalk thought it was Sharp who had retweeted it. He said Sharp was a nob for retweeting it and even when it was pointed out that Sharp hadn't retweeted it he posted this. I love the response

Screenshot_20181029-224227.png
 
Danny04 said:
No response yet. Sorry I didn’t reply to your tweet, I didn’t get a notification and my fingers had frozen at Stocksbridge regardless
Click to expand...
.....:shark:
Were the chips frozen as well...........:rolleyes:o_O
 
Sean Thornton said:
The main censorship on there is as a result of the advertisers codes of conduct. That's why there's a members only hidden section where anything goes.
Click to expand...

I think it was probably sensible, given the lad was identified. Notwithstanding were my sympathy (or lack of) lies, keyboard warriors encouraging violence against a named person is probably leaving the Forum upon which it is posted somewhat vulnerable.
 

You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Deadbat
Season Review / School Report 24/25: Part 5 - Midfield
Replies
3
Views
607
Deadbat
Deadbat
Deadbat
Deadbat's Season Review / School Report 23-24 - Part 6: Midfield
Replies
11
Views
2K
Deadbat
Deadbat
Deadbat
United 0 Spurs 3 - report
Replies
27
Views
2K
John Street West Terrace
John Street West Terrace
pommpey
My take ...
2 3 4
Replies
91
Views
7K
dublin 10 blade
dublin 10 blade
pommpey
My take ...
3 4 5
Replies
137
Views
12K
BushBlade
BushBlade

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom