All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
He's a young lad with a kid and can understand he wants to be successful.
There’s plenty to give them stick about with the general running of the club, and slow transfer business in the past year or so without making stuff up. That’s what annoys me.
Have you seen him play?
Cast your mind back a matter of months… if that’s club policy, it’s pretty hypocritical
Not at efl level I don’t think. Probably due him being more of a 5 aside street footballer than an 11 aside player it’s taken a while to adapt him to playing 11 aside football.
Well off the mark. There’s a reason jebbo couldn’t get into the u23 starting 11 when mousset dropped down to get some match fitness. After watching as many u18 and u23 games and highlights as possible, i personally believe Ndiaye is the better of the two incredible prospects. Just a personal opinion though
I’m not saying he’s better or worse just saying that’s the reason why ndiaye has been a late bloomer only hitting his stride in his 20’s
Apologies, i mis understood. I think the fact wilder wanted ndiaye to be our starting number 10 this season (before wilder left) should tell us everything about the lad
I think the fact we are offering him a new deal at 21 which is when you want them to be breaking through shows how we see him we must see him as a player who can contribute to the match day squad.
Iliman went on loan to Hyde United in the January 2020 Window
Which Academy players were allowed to play higher up before signing the contract? Name them please.
are we only bringing academy players into this then? Completely ignoring the first team player which was allowed to play whilst running his contract down?
N'Diaye was never in the Academy as such - came on trial and played for under 23 team never played for the under 18 team and was never on a scholarship with us.
That was Wilder's and then Heckingbottom's decision, not the club, if you are talking about Lundstram.
So should this not be Slavisa’s decision? That’s hypocritical in the very sense of the word
Explain?So should this not be Slavisa’s decision? That’s hypocritical in the very sense of the word
Read it, it’s not difficult
Read what?
What I’ve said
if it was Wilder’s choice to play Lundstram despite the clubs contract stand off, why shouldn’t Jokanovic be allowed to do the same?
The purpose of the Academy is to provide players for the 1st team. Ndaiye is still an u23s player, he has refused to sign a contract. Our Academy has similar policies as other clubs. You will have read news of other clubs refusing to loan out an Academy product until they have signed the contract that the club offered them. Are they being critical too? There are loads of clubs still picking 1ST TEAM PLAYERS who are running down their contracts and it is usually the 1st team's manager's decision.What I’ve said
It’s the same club. I don’t care whether he’s a first teamer, academy prospect or it’s a she in the women’s team.
NDiaye has made a first team appearance. And I don’t care what other teams are doing.
So you believe in running a club without rules and policies?
He is under contract......
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
