Oohaah! Bob Bookah!
Member
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2017
- Messages
- 531
- Reaction score
- 1,128
We’ve got Hamer instead?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Still need a link player even with Hamer imo but maybe we’ve earmarked that as being one of the loan slots now.We’ve got Hamer instead?
Because we've spent too much on Hamer?Deals off
Archer?We’ve moved on he’s costing more than we want to pay
We’ve wanted him all summer but on loan, if it’s true villa only want to sell then I can’t see it.Archer?
Shame, unless they’d go for loan to buyWe’ve wanted him all summer but on loan, if it’s true villa only want to sell then I can’t see it.
I see you also saw the Darren Smith tweet that said it was Hamer or AkpomDeals off
Archer it is thenDeals off
Sorry no I didn’t see thatI see you also saw the Darren Smith tweet that said it was Hamer or Akpom
Deals off
Thank fuck. He’s a solid option. But nobody NOBODY continues scoring like he did. Every single shot went in. That’s not being repeated in a higher league.We’ve moved on he’s costing more than we want to pay
Like Graeme Jones, for those that remember himThank fuck. He’s a solid option. But nobody NOBODY continues scoring like he did. Every single shot went in. That’s not being repeated in a higher league.
When I first saw it I just thought he was playing it safe in the fact that we might not get both of them, still don't think he genuinely knew which one we would get but perhaps he knew that signing both on permanent deals was unlikely to begin with.I see you also saw the Darren Smith tweet that said it was Hamer or Akpom
Rocket Man v Rifleman !We sure this is off? Unless my contact is out of date, then Akpom 8m and Archer 10m (with buyback) are still top of the list of who we want. Archer easier as the buyback option is speeding things up now. Doyle (10m) is very much on. What I can't work out is that Doyle is also meant to be a permanent? Do our funds do all of the above? Looking more and more like one loan now. Palmer was favourite but City undecided if they are loaning Palmer or McAtee now. No mention of Smallbone. Contact has been on the San Miguel's though and the bar opened at noon.
I can't see the funds stretching for that, and had seen that we weren't willing to enter a bidding war for AkpomWe sure this is off? Unless my contact is out of date, then Akpom 8m and Archer 10m (with buyback) are still top of the list of who we want. Archer easier as the buyback option is speeding things up now. Doyle (10m) is very much on. What I can't work out is that Doyle is also meant to be a permanent? Do our funds do all of the above? Looking more and more like one loan now. Palmer was favourite but City undecided if they are loaning Palmer or McAtee now. No mention of Smallbone. Contact has been on the San Miguel's though and the bar opened at noon.
I doubt we could get Archer for 10m, I thought Villa were wanting 20m for him.We sure this is off? Unless my contact is out of date, then Akpom 8m and Archer 10m (with buyback) are still top of the list of who we want. Archer easier as the buyback option is speeding things up now. Doyle (10m) is very much on. What I can't work out is that Doyle is also meant to be a permanent? Do our funds do all of the above? Looking more and more like one loan now. Palmer was favourite but City undecided if they are loaning Palmer or McAtee now. No mention of Smallbone. Contact has been on the San Miguel's though and the bar opened at noon.
We sure this is off? Unless my contact is out of date, then Akpom 8m and Archer 10m (with buyback) are still top of the list of who we want. Archer easier as the buyback option is speeding things up now. Doyle (10m) is very much on. What I can't work out is that Doyle is also meant to be a permanent? Do our funds do all of the above? Looking more and more like one loan now. Palmer was favourite but City undecided if they are loaning Palmer or McAtee now. No mention of Smallbone. Contact has been on the San Miguel's though and the bar opened at noon.
Absolutely 0% chance we spend £43m on 4 players.We sure this is off? Unless my contact is out of date, then Akpom 8m and Archer 10m (with buyback) are still top of the list of who we want. Archer easier as the buyback option is speeding things up now. Doyle (10m) is very much on. What I can't work out is that Doyle is also meant to be a permanent? Do our funds do all of the above? Looking more and more like one loan now. Palmer was favourite but City undecided if they are loaning Palmer or McAtee now. No mention of Smallbone. Contact has been on the San Miguel's though and the bar opened at noon.
Absolutely 0% chance we spend £43m on 4 players.
Fast moving market now, Hecky demanded action, mate on holiday, beer flowing so I'm probably setting myself up to fail but there you go.I can't see the funds stretching for that, and had seen that we weren't willing to enter a bidding war for Akpom
Would take Archer for 10, depending what the buyback fee is, and always happy to have Doyle back.
How convinced are you that your source is accurate?
It's unlikely but we have received £30m plus from selling our two best players and we have a massive increase in income this year.Absolutely 0% chance we spend £43m on 4 players.
Don't forget we've already spent the best part of 20 million.It's unlikely but we have received £30m plus from selling our two best players and we have a massive increase in income this year.
It isn't that much in that context.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?