Arthritis fingers small keypadthey should have gone into education like you did
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Arthritis fingers small keypadthey should have gone into education like you did
I'm actually currently involved in a case where we're criminally prosecuting the promoters of a dodgy loan charge schemeDo we know each other? I work directly against you. For years HMRC have gone after the wrong targets with regard to avoidance schemes. Even though they have had the power to pursue the scheme promoters they have gone for the easy targets, including a lot of nurses and similar. HMRC’s actions have been scandalous and are not defensible. You will no doubt be aware of the number of suicides attributed to the Loan Charge. The Enabler provisions might improve matters, but will HMRC use them effectively? Not if past behaviour is anything to go by.
About time. You work for FIS?I'm actually currently involved in a case where we're criminally prosecuting the promoters of a dodgy loan charge scheme
No, it just takes many years for them to be litigated until there is a final legal decision that they don’t work.Post office scandal started in 1999, most were only aware after the documentary was made.
Worse still the infected blood scandal started in the 1970's.
Presumably these 'schemes' were making profits initially, otherwise HMRC would not be chasing them for taxes due.
Bloody hell that's a blast from the past, used to play cricket with Stewart when I was a kid, never knew he was a convicted fraudster!Knew of Stuart and his acquaintances and the rumours at the time were that he’d bitten off more than he could chew with Cahill and one other. It seemed that the South Yorkshire crew didn’t fancy taking on the Liverpool crew and so Imprisonment was possibly the better option.
The irony is that all that was initially at risk was; the tax, on the interest, on their capital. To avoid that they were persuaded to place the whole of their capital at risk and still ended up with a tax bill.Yes, they were relatively wealthy but they’re still professional footballers with a short career, at the age of 35 their income could drop to zero.
So whilst the strategy of investing and avoiding tax wasn’t a good idea, it was a case of players trying to secure their futures. They weren’t the rich trying to get even richer.
If you’ve got a limited shelf life, your views on finances will be different to someone with a career that lasts into their 60s.
True , but if you're someone like Deano who is an icon at a club, you're unlikely to find it hard to get a job at 35. It's not like being reserve left back at Accrington Stanley.
And you can invest your money in legitimate investments that provide a decent return.
Why exactly? Some of them went bankrupt as a result of this.
To me there is very little difference to an old lady getting scammed out of her life savings and a ex pro footballer getting scammed by a “financial advisor”.
The route cause of all this can be traced back to our former Prime Minister Margaret Hilda Thatcher who told us greed was good.
The route cause of all this can be traced back to our former Prime Minister Margaret Hilda Thatcher who told us greed was good.
I always preferred Ed the Duck.I always thought that was Gordon Gekko?
Just finished watching the show. A few have a highish profile. Plenty don't have particularly high ones. It's pretty remarkable how the cps didn't take some of the cases further as the claims made are pretty eye opening.Old lady getting scammed out of all her savings likely means she will be living on soap for the rest of her days
Footballer getting scammed out of savings means they will just have to do a few podcasts to afford the luxurious again.
The route cause of all this can be traced back to our former Prime Minister Margaret Hilda Thatcher who told us greed was good.
I have no sympathy for them.
Too simplistic. Rod Wallace had £1.9m worth and that went. The risks should have been advised to them. It’s not alright just because you think they have a large wedge.I know I’m vastly underestimating the issue here, but in my simplistic way of viewing things:
If you’re a mid 30s ex prem footballer with 10M in the bank and someone approaches you with a scheme to turn that 10M into 20M and your answer isn’t ‘fuck off I’ve got enough money’
Then you’re a greedy bastard.
Interesting. Any chance I could have your address... Asking for friend?Could always put their money in a bank or building society or just hide it under the floorboards like I do.
There was a time when footballers invested in schemes which were actually intended to make a loss because the loss created some sort of tax benefit which increased the finances of the footballer.Why exactly? Some of them went bankrupt as a result of this.
To me there is very little difference to an old lady getting scammed out of her life savings and a ex pro footballer getting scammed by a “financial advisor”.
Too simplistic. Rod Wallace had £1.9m worth and that went. The risks should have been advised to them. It’s not alright just because you think they have a large wedge.
I do have sympathy for the wives and children.You may have no sympathy for the footballer but what about their wives and children?
Have you watched the documentary ?You say that like £1.9m is nowt. I have sympathy to a degree but in my book that's rich already, more than most of use will ever get near, so never mind a get rich quick scheme. If you go down that route you keep enough back in safer places you trust so you don't risk losing it all. If you throw the dice and chuck it all in based on what someone advises you then you're a fool who gets parted from his money.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?