DronnieBlade
Only in S2 !
What a daft thing to say after only 2 games where he's scored the grand total of no goals. That doesn't mean he's shit or good, lets see how he does for us over the full season then judge him instead of one or two games.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
What a daft thing to say after only 2 games where he's scored the grand total of no goals. That doesn't mean he's shit or good, lets see how he does for us over the full season then judge him instead of one or two games.
Except that he lacks pace, aerial ability, real strength and skill. His all round game is very average, although he might still be a decent finisher/poacher, although not at Championship level. He scored on his Leeds debut in August, then a penalty a few days before christmas. He's started 9 games and come on as sub 8 times. It would be great to see Billy back scoring regularly for us, but it would be a big and expensive gamble in my opinion.
Message to all you doubters.
If Sharp signs, see if the bookies install him as Fav to be L1 top scorer ? Why might that be ??
Still think you know better ???
Make NO mistake, every other L1 club manager would want to have Billy Sharp available to them. Every single one.
UTB
This is the post of the year surely?
Something that may or may not happen may lead to something else that may or may not happen and we are invited to offer a hypothesis of both actually happening. Would this come under consequentialism or theoretical physics?
Let me see if I can answer the original question ... Er....... if I = MC over 5 and V(x) = {mw2x2/2 for xV>0....
![]()
Oh fuck it - "LIZARDS!"
Small piece ?Prove me wrong William. Bang the goals in and I'll save you a piece of humble pie with a lovely dollop of cream. Mmmmmmmmm....
Told you it "might" workThis might work. He's been playing at Championship level for the last 7 seasons or so. He should still be plenty good enough for L1.
140 league goals aged 29 is not to be sniffed at.
It will depend on a vast improvement in attacking intent and delivery.
Fix the back 4 now and we might have a side again.
UTB
It seems to me that Adkins wants to build a side that is also designed for Billy Sharp to do well.
Gotta say I was one of those who didn't want Sharp back but my God he is proving me wrong so far. It's almost like a totally different player from last time out and has arguably been our best player so far
He's got to do better with the initial chance though5 in 5 is that ?
Well done Bill.
UTB
People were right to have doubts considering the pressure he was under having his third spell with us. He's answering the doubters including me at the minute but I do fear an injury with the effort he's putting in, you simply can't sustain his work rate for 90 minutes.Billy Sharp is performing at the top of his game and gives total commitment plus a bit. He is 2nd in the League 1 Top Scorers and has come through a lean patch during which the team lost it's way completely.
I am so pleased for him as a Blade that his third spell is going well. On this thread there were many doubters, some bitter ones too. I know this is third tier and Sharp could still play at the level above, but he wanted to come back and I'm glad he did.
As ever with Sharp, the team has to compensate for his lack of height and pace but I hope Adkins perseveres with the Done/ Sharp partnership and the rest of the team is chosen to play to their strengths and that means "on the deck".
My dream is Sharp scoring the winner at Hillsborough in the league next season.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?