Woodwardfan
Woodwardfan
- Banned
- #1
Dropped to the bench again tonight.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Is it a Rumour the Sharp is on the bench
If it isnt why is in the Rumour section
Added to that, his skills would be perfect for the role of the "1" in 4-5-1."
Except that he lacks pace, aerial ability, real strength and skill. His all round game is very average, although he might still be a decent finisher/poacher, although not at Championship level. He scored on his Leeds debut in August, then a penalty a few days before christmas. He's started 9 games and come on as sub 8 times. It would be great to see Billy back scoring regularly for us, but it would be a big and expensive gamble in my opinion.
But Sharp is crap at the lone striker role. He was isolated and ineffective in that role the last time he was with us under Blackwell. He's certainly slower and less effective since that time and has spent more of his time on the bench than on the pitch
...... Ideal for us then
Yes it would be a gamble but to my mind the "false 9" role does not need pace. It needs positioning and touch on the ball together with awareness of men around him.
Sharp has great awareness of situations because he plays with his head up when in possession.
As for expensive, I'm not so sure as Leeds will be looking to offload and Sharp may well be at the stage of life when money does not mean everything, particularly when he has had the tragic experience he had with his son.
Anybody any better ideas that just might fall into place? We desperately need a goalscorer.
At least he cant have lost any pace
Sounds like we will be seeing him for his 3rd unsuccessful stint soon thenAll this 'true blade' bollocks gets a bit tiresome. Yes he's got links to the club but signing people for sentimental reasons hasn't turned out well for us in the past, think Micky Adams and the second coming of Beattie. If you look at it objectively he's struggled at most clubs he's been at in recent years. Even Donny fans seem to think his best years are behind him and he's a real legend around there.
All this 'true blade' bollocks gets a bit tiresome. Yes he's got links to the club but signing people for sentimental reasons hasn't turned out well for us in the past, think Micky Adams and the second coming of Beattie. If you look at it objectively he's struggled at most clubs he's been at in recent years. Even Donny fans seem to think his best years are behind him and he's a real legend around there.
I really must get used to spelling things out for blokes who can't see connections. Apologies. Here goes:
"The Leeds manager is no longer at the club and it seems apparent that the new manager doesn't rate Billy too highly as he has been on the bench for 4 out of the last 5 games. Now this coincides with our "messiah" being recalled by his parent club who are going to appoint Hughton today. The new Brighton manager will more than likely see O'Grady as a key player for the rest of the season as he only has one other semblance of a striker on his books and Mackail-Smith is always injured. Right, SUFC are desperate and there were strong rumours about Sharp returning to us before he signed for Leeds. KM is known to be a fan and the new owner might think there is some mileage in recruiting a past hero and a true Blade who looks unhappy where he is and whose first choice would be to return "home". Added to that, his skills would be perfect for the role of the "1" in 4-5-1."
Hope that helps.
I think McNulty will soon (if he doesn't already) do everything Billy does better, and if the Eoin Doyle rumours are true, he may be an even better option. I would also like us to go for O'Grady.
So why is it a rumour the Billy might come back to BDTBL just because hes on the bench no credence in it apart from hes an ex Blade. I think Sharp is way past his best and hes not strong enough for the lone striker role.
He would probably be on the bench here as thats where Clough likes to park his strikers but Im sure he would look happier
You're going to have to enlighten me on when he's been a hero for us mate.Did you mean to put a 'Z' instead of an 'H'some mileage in recruiting a past hero
My mother used to say if there's no mould on it.............NO NO NO he is way past his sell by date.
We waste "small" players like Sharp, jamie Ward and Nathan DyerI am on this Forum to pass opinion and to test my opinions, to learn different views. I suppose I have an emotional attachment to Billy Sharp because I think we wasted his potential at Bramall Lane. I seem to be in a minority of one.
We rarely have young players who score for fun at every age level.
He was too small for Warnock who exiled him for peanuts, despite his immense goalscoring record age for age throughout with us and also in the league one with Scunny.
Robson never gave him a chance because McCabe signed him before the new manager arrived.
Blackwell had to play Beattie in the No.1 role. I said at the time that I would have built my side round Sharp, not Beattie, though I do accept we had money at the time and that confused priorities. Beattie to me was never a medium term solution, though that's a separate debate.
If we had different managers at the time we would have played to Sharp's strengths and not asked him to make up the numbers. If we had played to his strengths he could have been immense for us.
Maybe the time has passed, but I would bet big money on him succeeding for us at this level, and indeed in the Championship. He's still a young man. Always make your main striker top man, make Sharp that and watch him go. We will never know.
Bit extreme that B56We waste "small" players like Sharp, jamie Ward and Nathan Dyer
We waste "small" players like Sharp, jamie Ward and Nathan Dyer
Fair point K. should have said don't make the best use of "small" players (awaits hightest comments)But extreme that B56
Not sure we took that sort of "contract" out on them.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?