LSF
Active Member
Interesting and well argued debate on Brayford. Both Ricky and Grizzly make excellent points to support their opinion. Pity other debates can't follow suit..The mistakes seemed more frequent than they should be with Brayford and that continued last season with us.
Knee injuries do a fuck a lot of players up, especially players who rely heavily on playing a high intensity sort of game like Brayford did, and players who rely a lot on a turn of pace. So this sort of injury is likely to affect Brayford quite a bit, it's just that he wasn't really any better before injury - it's possible that was a blip but personally I think it was a bit more than that. Many players do come back from these injuries though, it depends on the individual. Although I don't think injury's the main factor behind Brayford's deterioration, his age and the type of player he was only cements my opinion that he won't recover his old form and we should cut our losses.
We'll wait and see what happens with him this season if he stays. If he stays injury free in a better team I expect a bit of improvement but I'm not expecting him to get close to the levels he showed on loan and look like someone we could rely on in the Championship.
I have to say I'm more in agreement with Ricky's side of it, Brayford is a pale shadow of the bloke who joined us on loan and I'm struggling to understand why?
Is it the injury? Ricky's theory does carry some weight for me.
Is he still 'recovering'? Hopefully this is the reason and we will see a better version soon.
However, despite the theories, I've never been over enthralled with him even when most were ejaculating when discussing him 18 months ago.
He's OK as full backs go but has too many weaknesses to be regarded as anything more than average, even at this level.