brownblade
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2014
- Messages
- 4,323
- Reaction score
- 5,999
- Thread starter
- #31
Are they? I hadn't read about this.I know Bournemouth were interested but apparently they are beyond skint
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Are they? I hadn't read about this.I know Bournemouth were interested but apparently they are beyond skint
I’ll try and find it, I read a few weeks back they’ve essentially ruled out any paid signings because they can’t afford it. Basically guaranteeing themselves last placeAre they? I hadn't read about this.
Slightly off topic, but I found this a very interesting insight into why AFC Bournemouth won't increase their ground capacityI’ll try and find it, I read a few weeks back they’ve essentially ruled out any paid signings because they can’t afford it. Basically guaranteeing themselves last place
You might be right. But they might settle for annual installments. Maybe there's a deal to be done.It's a big ask without selling anybody. He might be in the final year of his deal, but he's young and very talented. I don't think they'd sell for less than £5m.
We've already spent £3/4m on Anel. I'd be surprised if there's a budget for it.
Slightly off topic, but I found this a very interesting insight into why AFC Bournemouth won't increase their ground capacity
You could skip to the last 10 minutes, which is probably the most interesting part to be fair!Soz EV but with the best will in the world I cannot motivate myself to watch a 20 minute YouTube discussing the pros and feckin cons of Bournemouth expanding their ground. I’ve got a couple of gallons of paint that needs applying and watching.
Eeeeeeeeeeeer, NOYou could skip to the last 10 minutes, which is probably the most interesting part to be fair!
I wonder if this lad & Khadra are prospects only if Berge leaves ?
I reckon the owners will take any chance to cash in on Berge in the next 5 weeks.
Bowler for Soup?Bowler might cost £3m according to Lancs Live. No bids. https://www.lancs.live/sport/football/transfer-news/blackburn-rovers-josh-bowler-transfer-24560946
Isn't next season his last season?Nobody is going to offer anywhere near the amount Utd want for Berge - the market has changed since he was bought.
Why would Utd accept a low offer? The only way he'll be able to move will be to be a standout performer on a consistent basis for Utd and do well for Norway.
Isn't next season his last season?
He's not going to sign another one with us so it's either keep him and hope we go up or sell him and get a decent amount back.
If he's going to play in a flat 3, the former seems unlikely.
Agree Robbie - the only other way Utd could retain any sort of meaningful value is if he does indeed sign anothet contract but the likelihood of that is very low even if Utd get up this season
He still has a couple of years on his contract. Highly unlikely that we’ll get a return on our original outlay, as the owners were originally supposedly looking for, but at the same time I can’t imagine them been willing to take a haircut this summer. I would imagine the fee would need to be close to what we paid for it to be tempting.I suspect if we received an offer significantly over £10 million then we'd likely take it.
My worry is that this might happen at the end of the transfer window. I suspect this might depend on how well he starts the season. It's a long August.
Is that their plan for relegation?Just seen they are signing him to loan him to Olympiakos
*Cough, CoulibalyIt sounds bent to me, the owner signing a player then sending them to his other club. All a bit dodgy
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?