Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
No chance.
On the cheap.
Dead in the water.
Wages.
End up at Millwall.
All symptomatic of a negative attitude towards the club we ‘support’. There are no shortage of examples, day in: day out.
Fax machine, anyone?
If this one came off, can anyone see merit in playing two AM’s and dropping a CF? Duffy, Fleck and Freeman all trying to open up the defence?
Agree with most of that except your first point. In what possible way would adding an extra body to the midfield mean it will get walked over?Hope not, we will get walked over in midfield....I could definitely see Freeman playing in the 10 just behind the main striker though
If we can get Freeman I think he will initially come in and job share with Duffy.....Duffs can't do a full 90 now and if he started last season he invariably came off with 20 to go....I could see either Duffy or Freeman starting and the other coming on for the last 20......doesn't bode too well for Ricky Holmes....could he be a makeweight in the deal???
We have a conundrum for midfield when everyone is fit anyway.....Fleck is a definite so we then have 2 places between Evans, Coutts, Lunny, Holmes, Freeman, (Poss) Duffy & Leonard.....although I can see Leonard being used more as defensive cover rather than midfield.
Other than location why would he go to Millwall over us?
Boro, Derby, Leeds etc but we aren't losing out to Millwall on this one.
Agree with most of that except your first point. In what possible way would adding an extra body to the midfield mean it will get walked over?
Paul Coutts is our best player by some margin. When he’s fit, he and Fleck are the first names on the sheet, but in that order. Only then do you need to start thinking...
My misunderstanding, I thought the OP was saying 2 AM's and Fleck, not a midfield 4.....
I'd add McGoldrick to the AM role too.I meant us lining up like this
----------------------------------GK----------------------------------
----------------------CB------CB-----CB-------------------------
---RWB--------------------------------------------------LWB-------
--------------------------CM ----------CM---------------------------
-----------------AM-----------------------------AM------------------
-----------------------------------CF---------------------------------
Fleck, Evans, Coutts, Leonard and Lundstram fighting it out for the CM role and then Duffy, Freeman and Holmes covering AM.
If we can't get anymore forwards in, that would certainly leave competition up front with what we've got.
I meant us lining up like this
----------------------------------GK----------------------------------
----------------------CB------CB-----CB-------------------------
---RWB--------------------------------------------------LWB-------
--------------------------CM ----------CM---------------------------
-----------------AM-----------------------------AM------------------
-----------------------------------CF---------------------------------
Fleck, Evans, Coutts, Leonard and Lundstram fighting it out for the CM role and then Duffy, Freeman and Holmes covering AM.
If we can't get anymore forwards in, that would certainly leave competition up front with what we've got.
I'd say best 'players' by some margin.
There's not much between the two.
Although an on form Duffy is a joy to watch.
You’re right. I was exaggerating to emphasise a point.![]()
I meant us lining up like this
----------------------------------GK----------------------------------
----------------------CB------CB-----CB-------------------------
---RWB--------------------------------------------------LWB-------
--------------------------CM ----------CM---------------------------
-----------------AM-----------------------------AM------------------
-----------------------------------CF---------------------------------
Fleck, Evans, Coutts, Leonard and Lundstram fighting it out for the CM role and then Duffy, Freeman and Holmes covering AM.
If we can't get anymore forwards in, that would certainly leave competition up front with what we've got.
You need a bigger screen mateTwo wing backs down one flank. Wilder has lost it.
You need a bigger screen mate![]()
Zoom out!Fine in the quoted posts but me phone is showing RWB and LWB down one side int initial post!
Meant to be state of the art, this phone. I'm having words.
I meant us lining up like this
----------------------------------GK----------------------------------
----------------------CB------CB-----CB-------------------------
---RWB--------------------------------------------------LWB-------
--------------------------CM ----------CM---------------------------
-----------------AM-----------------------------AM------------------
-----------------------------------CF---------------------------------
Fleck, Evans, Coutts, Leonard and Lundstram fighting it out for the CM role and then Duffy, Freeman and Holmes covering AM.
If we can't get anymore forwards in, that would certainly leave competition up front with what we've got.
I remember him, I remember him well. I remember him playing for Stevenage at the Lane a few years ago and we just couldn't get the ball off him at times. He seemed to be able to hold onto it and dribble past everybody - he was very difficult to deal with.
I think he's been back to the Lane more recently than that though, and tbh, I didn't notice much about him last time, only that he'd plonked a lot of weight on.
Talented footballer - definitely.
Really nice consolation goal from Freeman at the Lane last season:
I don’t think he gets enough goals for that role. Better alternating with Duffy and with two genuine goal threats in front. Just my opinion of course!Rather than two AM positions slot Freeman into the ‘brooks’ role, second striker slightly behind the main centre forward, with Duffy still linking play
Bid £3m apparently
WUEDP?Bid £3m apparently
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?