Away Shirt (Don't like kits? Don't open)

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?




27342676350_fb99362fa6_o_d.png

Thats a good shirt.
 
There's a guy at the gym who wears a shirt like that but red /black stripes across chest. It looks Adidas, thought it was Germany at first. Thought of it as an away kit before this post. Great minds and all that.
 
Just out of interest, how many more seasons does the Adidas deal last for? I've not been impressed with the home shirts, last season's away shirt was decent, but that's the only one I've liked. Particularly disappointed with this seasons kit to be honest. How long to wait for a shirt with stripes all over the shirt! I would say the Macron one of three years ago has been the best in recent seasons.

SUFC-Home-Kit.jpg
Adidas don't put stripes on anyone's sleeves, supposed to be because of all the waste material it would produce, them being ever so green and all, same with not matching front and back of shirt at the sides. It means they use as little material for each shirt as possible to maximise profit.
 
reminds me a bit of the away shirt we had when Alex Sabella was with us. You never see it mentioned or seen much.

Cj9ruVKWEAEimuI.jpg
Charlton 3 (Shipperley, Flanagan 2) Blades 1 (Varadi). I was in the 6th form at boarding school in Newbury and travelled by train to watch the match
 
Adidas don't put stripes on anyone's sleeves, supposed to be because of all the waste material it would produce, them being ever so green and all, same with not matching front and back of shirt at the sides. It means they use as little material for each shirt as possible to maximise profit.

so long as you mean that (adidas don't put stripes on everyone's sleeves?).

Isn't the horrible truth then - that the cloth costs MORE than the labour. Because in using a patchwork of different pieces of fabric to save money, they mean many more yards of seams for some poor blighter in a poor country to sew.

The multi-panel construction method employed in football shirt construction goes against standard tailoring practice doesn't it? Just looking at a photograph of the new shirt, it seems to be made of at least 12 pieces of cloth sewn together + 6 adidas stripes. My (more fashionable) T- shirt seems to be made out of 5.

Doesn't it go to show what a rip off the whole thing is.......still we already knew that........
 
Wore that kit in the 2-1 defeat at Stoke in Oct 1978 and 3-1 defeat at Charlton in December

The Stoke game was on the "Midlands" version of YTV's football show on the Sunday, so it's there to be seen if you can find the clip somewhere.

We went 1-0 up, they got the dodgiest of penalties when Garth Crookes lobbed himself to the floor at a corner and we were denied a perfectly good equaliser for offside at 1-2. Referee Ken Walmsley from Blackpool was on my "hit list" for many a year after his performance that day.
 
The one in the OP is lovely but I can't see it being that. For me it's a little too similar to the home kit and we would require more of a contrast....unless there's a third kit.


This. I like it but too similar to the home kit to be an effective away kit. Can see us with something in yellow or lime green potentially.
 
The Stoke game was on the "Midlands" version of YTV's football show on the Sunday, so it's there to be seen if you can find the clip somewhere.

We went 1-0 up, they got the dodgiest of penalties when Garth Crookes lobbed himself to the floor at a corner and we were denied a perfectly good equaliser for offside at 1-2. Referee Ken Walmsley from Blackpool was on my "hit list" for many a year after his performance that day.
We played very well that day, a Stoke fan from my school (he went on to be a linesman in the FL) admitted we were unlucky not to win. It was Brendan O'Callaghan who scored first with a header after a Colin Franks error. Peter Anderson equalized with a header. Agree that the ref had got the penalty award wrong, he adjusted Andy Keeley to have fouled a Stoke player (didn't realize it was Crooks). Don't remember the offside goal. I thought our season would get better after that display at Stoke but I was wrong
 
Adidas don't put stripes on anyone's sleeves, supposed to be because of all the waste material it would produce, them being ever so green and all, same with not matching front and back of shirt at the sides. It means they use as little material for each shirt as possible to maximise profit.

We should have never used them then should we! They do a decent shirt for the solid colour teams like Germany and Man U.
 
Assuming it'd have white shorts and white socks, in which way would that be too similar to the home kit?


It could work with white shorts and socks. But, teams sometimes change their shorts and socks when necessary whilst wearing the home shirt anyway. I can't envisage many scenarios where our home shirt with white shorts and socks would be particularly more inappropriate than this kit. As I say though, I do like it.
 



It could work with white shorts and socks. But, teams sometimes change their shorts and socks when necessary whilst wearing the home shirt anyway. I can't envisage many scenarios where our home shirt with white shorts and socks would be particularly more inappropriate than this kit. As I say though, I do like it.
It's majority white, not red and white stripes.

Initially you said it'd be too similar to the home kit.

Now it seems you are basing this only on if and when we change our home shorts and socks to white also?

Think you've got a bit muddled there.
 
It's majority white, not red and white stripes.

Initially you said it'd be too similar to the home kit.

Now it seems you are basing this only on if and when we change our home shorts and socks to white also?

Think you've got a bit muddled there.


Not muddled at all. The shirts are too similar in my opinion. Shorts and socks are often changed as and when required and the change in shirt wouldn't be different enough to make it worthwhile. All in my opinion of course. I think you're just looking for a rather silly argument now.
 
The Stoke game was on the "Midlands" version of YTV's football show on the Sunday, so it's there to be seen if you can find the clip somewhere.

We went 1-0 up, they got the dodgiest of penalties when Garth Crookes lobbed himself to the floor at a corner and we were denied a perfectly good equaliser for offside at 1-2. Referee Ken Walmsley from Blackpool was on my "hit list" for many a year after his performance that day.
Was it called 'Central', G2000, with Greavesy? If it was I always used to get that channel but never the Yorkshire version.
 
Not muddled at all. The shirts are too similar in my opinion. Shorts and socks are often changed as and when required and the change in shirt wouldn't be different enough to make it worthwhile. All in my opinion of course. I think you're just looking for a rather silly argument now.
So you think this;
j6u49j.jpg

Is too similar to this?


Sheff-Utd-Home-Jersey-2016-2017-150x150.jpg



Bloody hell, I know how you feel. Straining my eyes trying to tell them apart here.
 
The Stoke game was on the "Midlands" version of YTV's football show on the Sunday, so it's there to be seen if you can find the clip somewhere.

We went 1-0 up, they got the dodgiest of penalties when Garth Crookes lobbed himself to the floor at a corner and we were denied a perfectly good equaliser for offside at 1-2. Referee Ken Walmsley from Blackpool was on my "hit list" for many a year after his performance that day.

Wasn't Midlands TV (ATV) guy Hugh Johns?
 
We played very well that day, a Stoke fan from my school (he went on to be a linesman in the FL) admitted we were unlucky not to win. It was Brendan O'Callaghan who scored first with a header after a Colin Franks error. Peter Anderson equalized with a header. Agree that the ref had got the penalty award wrong, he adjusted Andy Keeley to have fouled a Stoke player (didn't realize it was Crooks). Don't remember the offside goal. I thought our season would get better after that display at Stoke but I was wrong

Cheers Silent.

It was Anderson that scored the disallowed equaliser as well.
Thought the same as you, we were going on to better things. All turned horribly sour, if that goal had stood who knows . . . . .
 
Not muddled at all. The shirts are too similar in my opinion. Shorts and socks are often changed as and when required and the change in shirt wouldn't be different enough to make it worthwhile. All in my opinion of course. I think you're just looking for a rather silly argument now.

I wouldn't say they're similar at all. If it is white shorts and socks, what's the problem?

For example, when Bradford come to the lane this season, what kit do you think they'll wear? I'm putting my money on white.

sheffield_united_2016-2017-1st.gif v Bradford_City_2016-2017-1st.gif

sheffield_united_2016-2017-1st.gif v Bradford_City_2016-2017-2nd.gif

sheffield_united_2016-2017-1st.gif v Bradford_City_2016-2017-3rd.gif

Crewe for example.

Which will they wear?

sheffield_united_2016-2017-1st.gif v crewe_alexandra_2015-2016-1st.gif

sheffield_united_2016-2017-1st.gif v crewe_alexandra_2015-2016-2nd.gif
 



I wouldn't say they're similar at all. If it is white shorts and socks, what's the problem?

For example, when Bradford come to the lane this season, what kit do you think they'll wear? I'm putting my money on white.

View attachment 17993 v View attachment 17990

View attachment 17993 v View attachment 17991

View attachment 17993 v View attachment 17992

Crewe for example.

Which will they wear?

View attachment 17993 v View attachment 17994

View attachment 17993 v View attachment 17995

Considering Crewe were relegated... Probably neither unless we draw them in the cup!
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom