Ainsley Harriott
I saw this thing on itv the other week
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2016
- Messages
- 21,585
- Reaction score
- 41,095
Managed to copy and paste it before the pay wall appeared. Very long read that
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Christa Ackroyd?
For me that's the least concerning red flagThe financing and conman advisor lead me to feel concerned. We’d be shouldering quite a lot of uncertainty with both, which I’d prefer the club to avoid.
Nah, I think he sounds pretty watertight stand up sort of guy.This sounds like a typical Blades takeover scenario to me.
- Won’t be a ‘leveraged’ deal,
- Using a convicted conman as his advisor on the deal.
- Still going through the ‘fit and proper’ test
- Some of the networks he claims his TV company work with deny knowledge of working with him and others have not responded.
Many said that over the period of the court case when the prince tried to take control, turns out for many he’s been the most stable investor prepared to put his hand in his pocket and give it a go backing the manager and the club. Didn’t work out but he tried and left us currently financially sound and owning our ow assets.I would much rather the Prince stayed on.
Swerve this fella at all costs. Has disaster written all over it.
That would be nobody then, in reality.Anybody with a commitment to The Blades and has the funds to back it up!
Whilst being nervous about this myself - we’re Chelsea in debt to the tune of over a billion to their owner?No. Just no. I'd much rather have an owner who injects a bit of money now and then but makes sure the books are balanced. If that means we won't make it to the EPL, then so be it.
I’d rather have an owner with the funds to take us forward - the team, ground and training facilities. One or two seasons in the PL every ten years and a ground and training set up that are falling apart is crap.No. Just no. I'd much rather have an owner who injects a bit of money now and then but makes sure the books are balanced. If that means we won't make it to the EPL, then so be it.
I'd much rather the club be self sufficient instead of hoping for some big sugar daddy to come in and buy us things.I’d rather have an owner with the funds to take us forward - the team, ground and training facilities. One or two seasons in the PL every ten years and a ground and training set up that are falling apart is crap.
The Prince doesn’t have the funds - unfortunately it sounds like this new guy doesn’t either.
Good programme that but I'm still perplexed as to how many people fall for these scams in this day and age. Someone phones you offering money it's a con.There’s a daytime documentary TV series Love Or Money about internet love scams which involve UK men or women sending money to somebody they’re in love with but have never met, often a very substantial sum, because they’ve fallen in love online.
The scam sometimes involves the scammer sending “proof” that they themselves have plenty of money in the form of an electronic bank statement, but the account is frozen, they just need some urgent cash for work purposes to be repaid. The point is it isn’t difficult to forge documents these days, surely the EFL isn’t that naive and Mauriss is just a fantasist time waster.
Premier league status and money got in players like Berge. We could have had you or I in charge and attract quality in the premier leagueI think the prince has been a terrific owner. He’s had the clubs best interests at heart. Allowed us to sign people like Sander Berge. Got the club and the stadium back together.
The only thing that’s limited him is his personal wealth. He’s not a billionaire.
I’d much rather keep the price who obviously does care about the club over some conman.
Premier league status and money got in players like Berge. We could have had you or I in charge and attract quality in the premier league
I'm not particularly interested in what ifs and maybes tbh. The truth is we will never know so let's stop pretending we were inside the board room. We absolutely could have spent wiser so to use that as something to knock a old owner doesn't really make much sense in this context eitherAbsolutely no way McCabe sanctions any of the big signings.
I know Mcburnie divides opinion but the prince personally acted as guarantor on that transfer as McCabe didn’t want us spending that type of money on a forward.
We’d have gone with loans and a few 4/5 m players if McCabe had won
I think the prince has been a terrific owner. He’s had the clubs best interests at heart. Allowed us to sign people like Sander Berge. Got the club and the stadium back together.
The only thing that’s limited him is his personal wealth. He’s not a billionaire.
I’d much rather keep the price who obviously does care about the club over some conman.
I'm not particularly interested in what ifs and maybes tbh. The truth is we will never know so let's stop pretending we were inside the board room. We absolutely could have spent wiser so to use that as something to knock a old owner doesn't really make much sense in this context either
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?