Just playing Devil’s advocate here…
While there’s no denying it’s been a terrible start, Selles had big shoes to fill, and deal with culture that ran through the club. He’s also clearly brought a different management style, and playing style, which some of the players will not have adapted to or liked.
Add in the challenge of the transfer window, the departure of some key players and the uncertainty of the remaining players futures. Selles was clearly frustrated with lack of timely signings - I can’t remember any other manager calling out the board/recruitment team in the first few weeks of their tenure!
All of this along with limited options to field a strong team was never going to make it an easy start.
Now I’m not defending him, as I was not convinced he was the right appointment in the first place, but to say he’s disorganised and a crap Manager at this stage seems a little premature.
In my opinion, the decision for the board is whether they give him time to prove his worth, now he has the players at his disposal, and risk losing further ground on the top six or do they hold him accountable for what seems to be their failings?!
