Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
No back of shirt sponsors allowed in the PL anyway.Don’t mind so long as they fuck Door Deals off.
Hope we don’t become the latest 32 red franchise.
WhoopsDon’t mind so long as they fuck Door Deals off.
Don’t mind so long as they fuck Door Deals off.
32 Red isn't a financial services company.
Don’t mind so long as they fuck Door Deals off.
And besides, the Prince wouldn't have any of it.
If Foxy sees what you wrote there![]()
Nice new avatar STI can see an S2 4SU released list on the horizon.....
or it may have been fx trading a quick google says they are Korean and possibly a ponzi bitcoin scam type thingi was talking to some bloke last night in the town hall and he mentioned they were the new shirt sponsors called fx finance (not the ones who fulham had) now i'd had a few so may have misheard but i did grab one of the chinese blokes and said "we're all blades arent we" to which he nodded nervously so they get the thumbs up from me.
i should have asked what the kit would be like next year thinking about it
Pretty sure i heard the Prince can/has vetoed sponsors in the psst due to religious beliefs.
Banks that charge interest are a form of gambling...
Bring on the Islamic bank of Saudi
That’s not the point. The point is that the Prince is strict. He vetoed a sponsorship from Ladbrookes this year (that’s why ramsdens was late) and he refused to let women serve him at the Ipswich match.Always avoid politics and comment on football on this thread. But just let me say:
I’ve been out all around the world, including Muslim countries, and every time they allow you to behave as you are. The taxi drivers in Sheffield don’t refuse a fare cos you’re pissed, the hard working Muslim women in Tesco, Asda, who serve alcohol and pork, the places you go that allow you to get on, like Malaysia and Southern Thailand, who have their religion, but know you are different. I’ve dated Muslim women and their families we’re open and friendly. This idea that Muslims are all strict so let’s accuse them when they allow westerners to live their life really grinds my gear. Saudi Arabia might not be the best place to live and, yes, let’s put pressure on them, but don’t read the daily mail and then pressure all Muslims to have that same strict belief otherwise they are not true Muslims. Most of them understand and live their lives.
Does my nut in to be honest.
Not going to argue about it anymore, but fucking hell, this comment is shit.
Not wanting to come across anti Muslim but that simply isn't true. Just look at the posts by female staff in the family stand. Trying to paint it as being bigotry is a bit of a overreaction.
The Prince clearly is either devout or wants to be seen as devout ( dry rooms in his box not letting female staff serve him etc) and i've heard from pretty good sources along those lines re sponsorship.
If its incorrect I'll gladly be proven wrong.
He vetoed a sponsorship from Ladbrookes this year (that’s why ramsdens was late)
please by all means post your definitive proof to back these claims upThat’s not the point. The point is that the Prince is strict. He vetoed a sponsorship from Ladbrookes this year (that’s why ramsdens was late) and he refused to let women serve him at the Ipswich match.
You’ve jumped the gun here and brought out the faux outrage without knowing what the point is or what you’re on about, and frankly made yourself look quite a bit daft.
Not trying to be anti Berkshire Blade here but was any of those anti-Prince stories substantiated? Or were they just utter bollocks, same goes for your sources.
Until someone proves something one way or the other I'd say it's always better to defend someone to write libelous things about them online.
Bank of Nippon subsidiary ?
I may just think and post quickly....
I don’t need to provide any proof for you. I know things. If you don’t want to believe me that’s totally your choiceplease by all means post your definitive proof to back these claims up
also if he is so strict surrely he would be against all types of usuary which would also exclude ramsdens as they loan and have interest which is also against the mulsim( amongst others including christianity) religion
I agree. I don’t like betting sponsors either so in that respect it’s a good decision he madeGood on him.
If we'd have had Ladbrokes on our shirts everyone would have shit the bed.
Although Ladbrokes have a large presence around the ground and are a partner so how does that work.
That’s not the point. The point is that the Prince is strict. He vetoed a sponsorship from Ladbrookes this year (that’s why ramsdens was late) and he refused to let women serve him at the Ipswich match.
You’ve jumped the gun here and brought out the faux outrage without knowing what the point is or what you’re on about, and frankly made yourself look quite a bit daft.
I don’t need to provide any proof for you. I know things. If you don’t want to believe me that’s totally your choice
Yep. I don’t like to get that petty though and I apologise for doing it this time. Just the ignorant twat trying to argue against fact got under my skin. Apologies"I know things"
Well that's the end of that particular 'discussion' then !
Thought they were oil company.Would that make it a shell company ?
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?