Hawkeye Decision at Villa Park

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Come on Bournemouth let’s find out the real true story about what really happened, because the story Hawkeye came up with couldn’t fool a school kid! It was a crock of shit! Cost the, £100 million! Sue Hawkeye Innovations, VAR, The Premier League, and the F.A👍 Also if we don’t get the full truth then we need a government football supporters petition! Could you imagine what we or any other club would be feeling? cheated!
 

Good news for us. Villa will be shit again next season. Bournemouth with their squad could have potentially done a lot better next season.

Plus we can go after Ramsdale now

How is it good news for us they have very wealthy owners that can invest heavily.

Yes it didn't do much for them this season but with the right investment they could end up having a far better season and finish above us.
 
Should Leicester sue due to Man United getting an incorrect VAR decision? Every team has a reason to sue due to mistakes.

Can people just let it go?
 
We're not involved so go for it Bournemouth...………….the decision/outcome was wrong at the time and still is. The FA can do what they want but don't when its reasonable to do so. Could have easily sorted this out after the game. But oh no!!!! If it have been Manure you never have herd the last of it and an FA review would have overturned it by now!
 
I'll be interested in what Villa do spend. Give what they spent this summer and last summer I'll be amazed if they meet FFP standards. Surely an embargo is forthcoming unless this can be offset by selling Grealish?
What FFP the Premier League doesn’t have anything tangible and Villa aren’t anywhere near qualifying for Europe?
What do you think they’re close to breaching?
 

Bournemouth need to read the small print in the Premier league rules...

'..any appeal involving Sheffield United will not be considered under any circumstances'. Please refer to May 7th 1994 and May 13th 2007 for clarification.

(This also applies to law courts in North Wales).
 
Down by 1 point...do they, can they or will they sue after the screw up with VAR. Thoughts?

Ooh good that’s at least four threads on the same subject. That goal’s given, the whole game changes and we would have lost 3-1. Fact.
 
Nobody knows what would've happened if it'd gone in, we could've still lost.

But would the fact that Villa didn't score, and we did but it ended a draw, outweigh hypotheticals in a lawsuit.

I don't really care, I think we should stay out of it, maybe just hang about incase there's some money in it for us, but I'd love Villa and Hawkeye/PL to get shafted just for the entertainment value.
 
But would the fact that Villa didn't score, and we did but it ended a draw, outweigh hypotheticals in a lawsuit.

I don't really care, I think we should stay out of it, maybe just hang about incase there's some money in it for us, but I'd love Villa and Hawkeye/PL to get shafted just for the entertainment value.
Nobody is going to win any case as it's impossible to prove it would've affected the outcome of the season. Doesn't affect us anyway as the 2 points don't help us.
 
Okay, a hypothetical question.

Say Bournemouth won or drew a game earlier in the season as VAR incorrectly ruled in their favour, and Villa lost a game due to an incorrect VAR decision went against them, then would the phantom goal that we scored even be relevant?

If incorrect VAR decisions were to come into an appeal, then ALL incorrect VAR decisions would have to be considered or all teams could cry foul.

Do we now sue the Premier League for missing out on Europe due to VAR? What if we do and the teams around us then launch appeals and VAR review then shows that we would've missed out anyway due to other decisions going against teams above us who would have had more points anyway?

It could be never ending.
 
I heard the guy from "football law" on the radio recently. He said there was no basis for a case as the technology used met "industry standards".
He also said the pigs case was dependent on whether the pigs had documentary evidence that they could backdate the ground sale to the previous year's accounts. If they do, no case to answer; if not they're screwed and the punishment can happen this year.
 
Okay, a hypothetical question.

Say Bournemouth won or drew a game earlier in the season as VAR incorrectly ruled in their favour, and Villa lost a game due to an incorrect VAR decision went against them, then would the phantom goal that we scored even be relevant?

If incorrect VAR decisions were to come into an appeal, then ALL incorrect VAR decisions would have to be considered or all teams could cry foul.

Do we now sue the Premier League for missing out on Europe due to VAR? What if we do and the teams around us then launch appeals and VAR review then shows that we would've missed out anyway due to other decisions going against teams above us who would have had more points anyway?

It could be never ending.

Not VAR though, it's Hawkeye which is given a very different level of trust.

If it's not a goal because the refs didn't turn it on, which seems likely, then Bournemouth surely have a case.
 
Not VAR though, it's Hawkeye which is given a very different level of trust.

If it's not a goal because the refs didn't turn it on, which seems likely, then Bournemouth surely have a case.

But VAR should've seen that there had been a clear and obvious error irrespective of Hawkeye and reviewed it. That's what annoyed me on the night, the fact they didn't even consider that something had gone wrong.
 
Should Leicester sue due to Man United getting an incorrect VAR decision? Every team has a reason to sue due to mistakes.

Can people just let it go?
VAR decisions are still subjective to a referee.

Hawkeye/GLT is foolproof.

Or so they said.

I hope Bournemouth chase it up
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom