Well, I don't know if "The-RUFC" is an official Rotherham FC post or not, but if it is, it's asking for trouble as well as being inaccurate.
The booking for the foul on Benson is arguable. Plenty of opponents have given Benson a little kick as soon as he comes on and got away with it; this one didn't. As for the foul on Roberts, he shouldn't have kept running into Roberts' leg when he realised he wasn't going to get the ball.
The one for the breakaway pulled up for a foul is laughable. As Ogbene got away from Maatsen, he swung and arm and caught Maatsen in the face. The ref obviously thought it was an accident or it would have been another red card, but it's definitely a foul.
It is not generally a red card offence to push someone in the back, even if quite hard and with the ball dead. As a general rule, push to the body = booking, push to the face = sending off.
The assertion that the ref shouldn't add time on if the injury is not serious, is nonsense. There were at least 4 injury stoppages, and certainly none was less than a minute. Norton-Cuffy was down twice, albeit with trivial "injuries", and then took (I timed it) over a minute to walk from one side of the pitch to the other when he was subbed; he added 5 minutes on his own. The scuffle at the end was over a minute, the red card was over a minute, the other 5 sub opportunities took time as well. 10 minutes easy to justify.
As for the throw-in, so what. Rotherham had a throw-in in the first half that should have been Burnley's. It evens out. Very few linesmen would know whose throw it was in those circumstances, because their job is to watch for offside. The ref would give that throw-in. As for the assertion that the wrong decision forced the full back to stop play, try and pick up the ball, turn to the linesman and complain, turn to the ref and complain, and jog very slowly back into the box making no attempt to get involved - surely only the first part can be (however tenuously) be blamed on the ref? The rest is the player's own responsibility.
