I get the general picture. Lots of stats. Lots of media. And our Govt continue to try to maintain things like Social Distancing, no spectators in grounds, travel quarantine, masks. And some people do their "own independent research" & think we should just unlock the lot. But, what do people really think this higher agenda is? That's the bit I don't get.
I do my own independent research. I've come to the conclusion that the measures we are being forced to take are not proportionate to the risk of death from coronavirus. There is no higher agenda or conspracy in my view. It's just a clusterfuck of the highest order, with numerous interpretations of the figures. It is normal for government to 1) err on the side of caution, and 2) never admit they got it wrong.
It's worth noting that dissent is far, far higher among those who don't have power. Among critics of the measures are many former politicians, and many former scientists who aren't reliant on instututes for a wage. But among those who have something to lose, people in power or on good salaries, there is far less criticism.
When people get in positions of power, or get a job with a good salary, they want to hang on to their position. For a politician, it's a no-brainer. Support more draconian measures and you'll lose nothing. You are following the advice of "the science" and your political party. Support an easing of draconian measures and you run the risk of your career being over. You will be accused of being irresponsible, a "covidiot," a conspiracy theorist. For a scientist, to go against the mainstream means they could lose their job, reputation or tenure. Opponents of the measures will also be accused of being "disrespectful to our loved ones who have passed away".
There are lots of stats and figures available. The graphs you see in most newspapers and mainstream websites are the most pessimistic ones. It's all about clicks, and towing the official line. Newspapers and websites thrive on bad news. It gets more clicks.
It's very clear to me that Cocid19 is not the horrific killer virus it was portrayed as. It's an infectious respiratory virus that is dangerous to very vulnerable older people. For most of us, a dose is nothing to worry about. The vast majority will either display no symptoms at all or recover in a week.
I realise that it is very hard for many people to accept any alternative narrative after their sacrifices, and constant media propaganda. Some of us will find it very difficult to accept that trusted news sources like the BBC will report "facts" that are incorrect. But this isn't the first time in history that the mainstream has been very wrong. I remember the BBC reporting that Saddam Hussain had weapons of mass destruction. Politicians were queuing up to urge us to attack Iraq before Saddam unleashed his weapons on us. Opponents of the war were portrayed as political agitators with an agenda, who "didn't beleive the facts"
There wasn't a huge conspiracy to attack Iraq. People and politicians simply believed the establishment narrative that was presented to them, because it was reported by trusted outlets like the BBC and the Times. They found it hard to beleive that politicians and the mainstream media could be wrong about Saddam's WMD's. Once an idea takes a firm hold within the establishment, it becomes very hard to counter it from the outside.
To me the current situation with covid couldn't be clearer. Lots more testing is being done, and therefore *"cases" are rising. But the fact that we are seeing lots of new cases but very few deaths should be something to be celebrated. It shouldn't make us more scared. It is clear now that the virus is nothing like as lethal as governments have been making out.
People should be made aware of the dangers to the very old and very vulnerable. They should be shielded if they choose. But yes, apart from that I agree we should "just unlock the lot." These measures are causing severe physical and mental harm to vulnerable people, putting many thousands out of work, and are creating a recession that could be on par with 2008.