Computer says no

[Tony_Kaufman]

What I don't understand is that if the use of AI gives an advantage in terms of recruitment and tactics, all clubs will use it. But still, only two clubs can finish in the automatic places and three AI-using clubs will be relegated. It won't bring any advantage if everyone uses it,

The best way I can put it is imagine good old Football Manager. Two players play the game at the same time on seperate computers. Both choose the same team and same season. They both search for a striker. One searches for someone with Pace 17+ and finishing 17+, the other searches for someone with fitness 17+ and finishing 18+.

Both games search the exact same data but the lists produced will be very different with some of the same players appearing on both.

This is how it will differ for every club. You all have the same data, but what you ask AI to search for within that data will be very different for each club.

 

[robbiez666]

It can't predict whether a new manager will be any good. But it can calculate whether we are more likely to get promoted by changing a manager of Wilder's calibre to an unknown quantity.

It will logically base its calculations on how new SUFC managers have fared over history - especially those who managed in the Championship. Did they gain promotion or end up being sacked? (23 over the past 50 years. Five gained promotion.)

If anyone's trusting emotion over logic, it's those who want CW gone.

You really need to do some research about how AI chatbots work.

 

[Dkc]

You really need to do some research about how AI chatbots work.

I'm not sure how they work but I know the answer it gave.

What factors could an AI Chatbot consider when judging the likely achievements of an unknown new manager - apart from the achievements of past new managers?