Ched

[blade too long]

Pity he can't sue crown prosecution who it transpired did nt share vital evidence. The twats

Still don't understand a rape conviction when the female involved never ever claimed it was rape.

Even a poor lawyer should press home small details like that

 

[Hackblade]

Being represented by Stuart Ripley is the most bizarre aspect of the story? What next - PR from Simon Garner?

 

[Nicolaus_Copernicus]

Evans: “get me the finest legal mind within our budget to defend my case in court”

Result:
View attachment 51831

By the looks of him, he's not missed many meals since he's retired.

 

[Hamburg Blade]

Pity he can't sue crown prosecution who it transpired did nt share vital evidence. The twats

Still don't understand a rape conviction when the female involved never ever claimed it was rape.

Even a poor lawyer should press home small details like that

Maybe because even a poor lawyer knows that isn't mitigating.

 

[8lade]

Second biggest supporter of the lad (after FM I think it was) but FFS I hope this is the last thread.

 

[Sikkim]

First, Brabners are a decent legal firm (decent sized and with a good reputation), so if they thought settling out of court was the right course of action, I can only assume it was because they thought they had a weak case.

Second, without dredging it all up again, I remember after he was sent to prison, an investigative journalist from down south (can't remember his name) looked into the case and came up with a load of stuff that he said should have been put forward by Ched's legal team, first time around. I think that this was the basis of the "new evidence" and the retrial, etc.

They may be a decent sized law firm, but they aren’t criminal lawyers.




Secondly, one of the new witnesses at the retrial didn’t come forward until after Ched was convicted.

 

[Mendi]

 

[GRUMPY BLADE]

Rename a Stand The Ched Evans Stand

Fuck, thought you'd typed remain for a minute.

 

[The Crab]

Being represented by Stuart Ripley is the most bizarre aspect of the story? What next - PR from Simon Garner?

Now you're just being silly.

It's Bobby Mimms that does the PR...…...

 

[zablade]

No been through the thread three times and can’t find F M Blade’s comment on this..

Has anyone checked to see if he’s brought the milk in the last few days?

 

[Sean Thornton]

Evans: “get me the finest legal mind within our budget to defend my case in court”

Result:
View attachment 51831

Is that FMBlade1 ?

 

[ChrisBlade]

Personally, I always felt that it was obvious that Ched should have just used a Defence team of Darren and Pinchy. Sorted!

So compo does not surprise me here. Brabners not a patch and DarPin LLC.

 

[Sheepstone]

Haven't we got a case for compo then since we lost a player but still paid wages

 

[Sheff de party]

Can we get the £500k we spent on him back? What an absolute waste.

 

[bornablade]

I'm surprised he (or someone) hasn't gone after North Wales Police who encouraged a young lady to report rape when she'd only come to report her missing handbag.

 

[Sikkim]

I'm surprised he (or someone) hasn't gone after North Wales Police who encouraged a young lady to report rape when she'd only come to report her missing handbag.

The police don’t make the decisions on whether to charge someone with a crime as serious as rape. That’s the Crown Prosecution Service’s job.

 

[Hamburg Blade]

I'm surprised he (or someone) hasn't gone after North Wales Police who encouraged a young lady to report rape when she'd only come to report her missing handbag.

They didn't and she didn't.

 

[Bert]

Haven't we got a case for compo then since we lost a player but still paid wages

Didn't we sack him upon his conviction?

 

[Hamburg Blade]

Didn't we sack him upon his conviction?

I thought he was out of contract a few weeks after.

 

[Bert]

I thought he was out of contract a few weeks after.

Bert's memory can't recall, but it's certain that we weren't paying him whilst he was locked up.

 

[Sikkim]

Bert's memory can't recall, but it's certain that we weren't paying him whilst he was locked up.

Not strictly true, I think we paid up his contract. So technically we did pay him for some of the time he was in prison.

 

[LoughboroBlade]

They didn't and she didn't.

It amazes me, 7 years after the trial, and after so much information where this case case been debated ad nauseum, that this is still somehow a point of confusion for some.

 

[Balham]

Can we get the £500k we spent on him back? What an absolute waste.

Nothing like £500k. £150k max, which we'd get from Fleetwood should he move there this summer.

 

[LoughboroBlade]

Not strictly true, I think we paid up his contract. So technically we did pay him for some of the time he was in prison.

His contract was expiring that summer in 2012, and news of his departure was announced with the retained list.

 

[Hamburg Blade]

Nothing like £500k. £150k max, which we'd get from Fleetwood should he move there this summer.

I thought that was the figure when we bought him the second time.

 

[Sikkim]

His contract was expiring that summer in 2012, and news of his departure was announced with the retained list.

Yeah, but we still paid him up..

 

[Balham]

I thought that was the figure when we bought him the second time.

I think the £500k figure came from Ashley Carson, Chesterfield director at the time. The same Carson who oversaw Chesterfield's descent from League One to the Conference relegation zone.

 

[Sean Thornton]

I think the £500k figure came from Ashley Carson, Chesterfield director at the time. The same Carson who oversaw Chesterfield's descent from League One to the Conference relegation zone.

Grey haired Owl himself.

 

[Hamburg Blade]

I think the £500k figure came from Ashley Carson, Chesterfield director at the time. The same Carson who oversaw Chesterfield's descent from League One to the Conference relegation zone.

I'm a little confused here and can't be bothered to scroll back or do my own research I thought the question was whether we could sue for compensation based on what we paid for him (not that I think we can) but that would be based on what we initially paid for him, what he would have been worth at the time, maybe wages, etc. Whatever we paid for him when we bought him from Chesterfield we won't get back, because that was afterwards.
Besides all that, I thought Wilder had denied it was as much as £500k.

 

[BushBlade]

I'm a little confused here and can't be bothered to scroll back or do my own research I thought the question was whether we could sue for compensation based on what we paid for him (not that I think we can) but that would be based on what we initially paid for him, what he would have been worth at the time, maybe wages, etc. Whatever we paid for him when we bought him from Chesterfield we won't get back, because that was afterwards.
Besides all that, I thought Wilder had denied it was as much as £500k.

It would have been quicker to scroll up the page than type that.

Shef de Partie asked if we could get our £500k back. Presumably it was a lighthearted throwaway comment that probably didn’t warrant further discussion because the answer is obviously ‘no’.