Woodburn - Loaned to a Dinosaur?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?




Typical reactions of self entitled fans of clubs like Liverpool. They won’t have seen a minute of us play so only care about their ‘wonderkid.’

If they’d seen his cameos and how others players are performing they’d know right away why young Ben can’t get in the side at the moment.

Still early days however, and an injury to Duffy would see him get a chance.
 
Dinosaur. Chris is younger than Jurgen.

And anyone that's seen us play knows he's not a tactical dinosaur.

I suggest any Liverpool fans disappointed watch some highlights of us playing. Sometimes you just can't get in.

Doubt Sturridge or Shakiri will start for them at the weekend no matter how good they've been because you don't upset something that works unless you have to.

Personally think Woodburn will play a big part, plenty of games left, and I'll be disappointed if he goes in January.
 
I saw that and nearly replied direct....bottom line is...it’s not our job to protect and bring him on for them. He rightly needed to go out and join a club such as ours, because from where I’m stood...he lacks the necessary graft, determination and creativity to make an impact in the championship.....it’s easy when you’ve got Salah and co laying on easy tap ins every week.
I hope he comes good.....but he will need to vastly improve....if not send him back to Liverpool....he can then go to a “development club”....If arrogant, big time Charlie Liverpool fans think our club exists to bring on their young player...think again...We are Sheffield United and get bullied by nobody.
 
Football snobs who know nothing outside the Premier League bubble.

Truth is he’s got to earn his place, and at the minute he’s probably 5th choice now Coutts is on his way back.

Got to say though if I was a Liverpool fan I wouldn’t be overly happy the fact he isn’t playing given how bright his future supposedly is. It’s obvious the lad needs minutes cause I think he could have a decent career ahead of him. Can see him being recalled in Jan and moved on to somewhere he can get game time, which tbh is probably best for all parties.
 
Lol. Don't try to have a sensible conversation with a Liverpool fan. At most they've seen him 9 times and he's already Pele? There's no chance hes not physically strong enough for men's football where he's not surrounded by internationals? Or that he's actually not that good yet?

I'm more than comfortable that our manager is doing what's best for our club. Maybe send him to Villa and see how that works out for him. I hear Boro and Pulis do a grand job of developing youngsters.
 
Loaned to a dinsoaur?!

Hardly - a manager with a knack for building a gem of a side on a shoestring of a budget.

A team that play expansive, entertaining, attacking football - arguably the best in the championship.

No dinosaurs here. The lad is simply having to tackle his first loan stint and any meaningful football in the men's game. He's tasked with stealing a place in a midfield that has been consistently very good for over two seasons now. It's a tall order.

He needs to get his head down, learn from those around him - because right now they are more experienced and frankly better than him. You don't get an automatic start just because you've come from a certain academy.

The shirt is currently Duffy's, and rightly so.
 
It’s click-bait shite that warrants as much of a read as any Football League World piece on United.

This. It's the usual trash pulled from a handful of tweets and almost certainly not reflective of what all Liverpool fans think.

That said, Liverpool have every right to be worried if Woodburn is not even making our match day squad. He was sent to us to develop as a player, and he won't gain much from watching the other lads play. Similarly, we've got every right not to pick him if other options are better. This is one of the dangers of the loan system, and if it's not working out we should send him back in January and get someone else.
 
Regan Slater hasn't played much for Carlisle, this to me is why loaning out young players to someone in a lower league is fantastic, it shows them that nothing is guaranteed in football, and that talent alone isn't enough. These young lads will learn to work their bollox off if they want to play regularly, and if they don't like that idea it will be a very short career for them.
 



I fucking hate Liverpool and this has just amplified it !

I’ve said on another thread. We need him to step up. He might get half an hour/ 20 mins on Saturday and if he plays in the Duffy role he can have as much or as little of the ball as he wants. The trouble is when he has come on and has been given the ball he’s looked bang average so far.

The only people that count are the Liverpool coaches that come and watch how we play and realise it’s actually him not performing.

God help everyone if they ever win the League. It’ll be replayed on Sky Sports Liverpool until my final day, such is the love in everyone has for those cunts !
 
I’m regularly told by Liverpool fans that he’s fantastic and they expected him to walk straight into our first 11. . They have no idea about the way we play and don’t understand the excellence of players like Duffy are limiting his chances so far.
They’re just self entitled fans who seem to think that teams like us should bow down to them because we have one of their players on loan!!.
I think he’s gonna struggle to get a run in the team unless he pulls his finger out of his arse and shows us all his capabilities!!. UTB
 
Typical reactions of self entitled fans of clubs like Liverpool. They won’t have seen a minute of us play so only care about their ‘wonderkid.’

If they’d seen his cameos and how others players are performing they’d know right away why young Ben can’t get in the side at the moment.

Still early days however, and an injury to Duffy would see him get a chance.

Don’t even go there. :(
 
I presume CW intended to use him in a Brooks-type role? Maybe he just hasn't settled here yet, but he doesn't seem to play with the same "swagger" that Brooks does.
 
Note: I don't know the point I'm trying to make here....

It says something though when they think he's the shit, when they're used to seeing some damn good players. What has happened to him and why? Is it him, our team, the style of the opposition and how we need to play against them, our manager? I've been very dissatisfied with him.

For the record, I was spunking a bit when we got him, but haven't spunked since. #readytoburst
 
This. It's the usual trash pulled from a handful of tweets and almost certainly not reflective of what all Liverpool fans think.

That said, Liverpool have every right to be worried if Woodburn is not even making our match day squad. He was sent to us to develop as a player, and he won't gain much from watching the other lads play. Similarly, we've got every right not to pick him if other options are better. This is one of the dangers of the loan system, and if it's not working out we should send him back in January and get someone else.
That fact that he’s not even making the bench now would suggest that he’s not even doing it in training, so it can’t just be be a case of match day pressure like for instance Clarke.

My hope was that he’d come on when we’re coasting to a win, nick a goal and he’d kick on, but I’m not sure if he’s been signed as a striker or an attacking midfielder and TBH, watching him play I’m not sure he knows either. He said something about replacing Brooks in his first interview.

He’s got to be a talent, he’s already impressed enough fans at club and international level, but like I posted on another thread, Klopp said someing about him getting his game back on track in a preseason game, so I suspect this dip started last season and he’s still not come out of it. He’s still only a kid to be fair, I’d love to see him turn it around and force his way into the team.
 
My prediction is from Xmas onwards Woodward will come good and come into his own if I recall Coady took a while to get going, As the season goes on he will get more and more minutes at the expense of Duffy as he tires.
 
On a separate, very speculative, note I was worried when we signed him that we would have financial penalties in place if we didn't play him, and that with our owners we'd end up playing him regardless of performance.

Taking the speculation forward, I'm happy knowing that CW is more of the attitude of "Princey boy, pay the bill, I ain't playing that shite"
 



That fact that he’s not even making the bench now would suggest that he’s not even doing it in training, so it can’t just be be a case of match day pressure like for instance Clarke.

My hope was that he’d come on when we’re coasting to a win, nick a goal and he’d kick on, but I’m not sure if he’s been signed as a striker or an attacking midfielder and TBH, watching him play I’m not sure he knows either. He said something about replacing Brooks in his first interview.

He’s got to be a talent, he’s already impressed enough fans at club and international level, but like I posted on another thread, Klopp said someing about him getting his game back on track in a preseason game, so I suspect this dip started last season and he’s still not come out of it. He’s still only a kid to be fair, I’d love to see him turn it around and force his way into the team.

I think at Liverpool he's seen as a second striker--sort of like the role McGoldrick plays for us at the moment. I suspect Wilder brought him to cover both that role and Duffy's.

The kid is very highly rated at Liverpool, and they're no mugs when it comes to developing young talent. That doesn't mean he's the right fit for us. But you can't loan a highly-rated young prospect from Liverpool to be a squad player, it's just not how it works. Either he gets some time on the pitch or he'll be off.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom