It is odd, looked lively in all the minutes he has played then seemingly discarded since Brewster arrived. There was some kind of rumour he said summat to Wilder after being subbed off v Arsenal, didn’t see it myself. Can’t imagine Wilder would hold that against him as it’s a normal thing to be pissed off after being subbed, especially if you are playing well.
We've tried to make a partnership out of Brewster and McBurnie. It's failed because Brewster is not up to speed yet.
We've also wanted to include McGoldrick, because we've lacked rhythm from open play. Especially as Norwood's been off form/missing as well, we've needed him to link play.
McBurnie has had a big part to play at defensive set pieces, as we don't have many players who are great in the air. I'm sure we've thought his heading ability could is a threat in the other box as well.
I think Wilder commented that Chelsea don't give up a lot of space in behind, inferring that there wouldn't be much use for Burke's pace. That's the part I think is a bit simplistic. We're badly lacking players who can beat a man and create unbalance among opposition defences. Instead we seem to think we're still going to score enough goals primarily by creating openings to get a cross in, even if the opposition have centre halves ready and waiting to deal with what's coming in.
West Ham's goal happened when Bowen found some space between our lines (not in behind). Bowen ran at our defence, then Fornals ran at us. We managed to stop both, but we were stretched, unbalanced, and when the ball fell to Haller we had nobody to challenge him. It shows that having players who tries to run at defenders can create openings, even if it's not a through ball behind a high defence.
We're desperate for someone to add this, and we should try to get Burke more involved - at the expense of whatever reasons we've had for not playing him lately.