derfblade.3
Well-Known Member
I'm calling the police!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Sorry but a fucking cock hair or a toe end offside?I'm very happy to say I'm a fan of VAR for offsides. Offside is a yes/no call based on trigonometry. You can be four yards offside. You can be four mm offside. You are offside. The technology works it out for you. I know there's a dick swinging contest to prove who is the Biggest Celebrator & it's being ruined. But, I'm outside that game.....
Pukki ... Offside there ... I'd be appalled if he'd scored that against us & it was allowed.
I'm calling the police!
I think it’s 6. Didsy @ spurs, 2 @ Brighton, McBurnie against Southampton, that Fleck one against Watford, is there another?Is that 7 chalked off for us? Answers now please as i am having a debate with a snorter.
Exactly. The problem is that the Lundstram and Mousset offsides were not only marginal, but the two players were attempting NOT to gain unfair advantage if you watch the replays back.VAR is absolute rubbish.....but there's an easy fix if the powers that be insist upon it.
Let it start and end with the referee.
If he and the linesman have given a decision, whistles gone, its made and the game continues. If he's not sure about something, he draws the square in the air and asks to check something. Then and only then does the VAR bunker or whatever the hell it is gets involved, not the other way round.
They should be looking for reasons TO award goals, not reasons to chalk them off because funnily enough, we dont like forking out to watch 0-0 draws
If the asst ref had flagged offside would that be the death of football or do you object to var making correct decisions?
I hate it but if it highlights the ridiculous offside laws and leads to changes in them then it will have been worth it
Who said anyone is fine with fucking anything?20cm is an obvious misquote if you think about it
People who are whining about the Pukki offside - this is nothing to do with "clear and obvious", as Phil says, it's matter of fact. If you want that allowed, do you also want that "goal" that Liverpool had disallowed against City last season that cost them the title to have counted? That's as close, if not closer, as the Pukki offside, but because it's not given by VAR you're fine with it?
And some fucking parasite sat somewhere, has caused that.The
I think the margin for error thing comes with the inadequate 50fps that the cameras run at.
Pukkis goal was an incredible piece of skill exquisitely timed and executed, VAR could well end up costing Norwich a cool £100m.
Oh for fucks sake.....Obvs, I understand that people may disagree with the law/rule. But, the VAR technology is implementing the law/rule. The so called Armpit is the law/rule in Sunday League Pub Football & the FIFA World Cup Final. Sheffield United have one of twenty votes at the Premier League table. And the outcome of that vote is the Premier League agreeing to use VAR. There is no external, it's them over there, Bogeyman. The Premier League is the Clubs. It's "us".
Video decisions are here to stay. You can't turn back time. The referee's whistle didn't used to have a pea in it......
Who said anyone is fine with fucking anything?
We're on about wankers sat lording it as fans curse in the rain.
Five minutes before you can celebrate a fucking goal.
A Ponce in a black jacket making window signs like a fucking ballerina then behaving like the officious twat he undoubtedly is to piss on someone's dinner.
The whole thing is an utter fucking joke.
VAR was brought in to stop clear and obvious errors.
You dont need lines and rulers to see a clear or obvious error....
If the asst ref had flagged offside would that be the death of football or do you object to var making correct decisions?
I hate it but if it highlights the ridiculous offside laws and leads to changes in them then it will have been worth it
Just one to go Phil.Phil's happy, he's on a hattrick.
That’s either an urban myth or it’s been missold
Every goal is checked, if there’s an offside involved however slight it will be disallowed
I thought it was 4 (now 5) given as a goal on-field then ruled out by VAR. The Watford goal was given offside on-field and then confirmed by VAR.I think it’s 6. Didsy @ spurs, 2 @ Brighton, McBurnie against Southampton, that Fleck one against Watford, is there another?
Fuck off into that home youWhen I started watching football and for years a goal was celebrated by the scorer turning back, walking back to his own half and a few handshakes on the way.
The players probably cared more than the current mercenaries, certainly no less.
Goal celebrations are ridiculous these days and should be curtailed.
I mention this because I question this instant and spontaneous joy thing. It is not the be-all and end-all. Three fans on our row in South Stand hardly react to goals, they remain seated, smile and sort of nod approval. They care, they are totally absorbed fans. Personally I jump up and instinctively celebrate with arms in the air and fist pumping etc. but I don't mind a disallowed goal if it is a correct decision, it will become the norm and routine
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?