Blend-it-like-Harris
Active Member
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2016
- Messages
- 1,320
- Reaction score
- 1,935
Yes - of course; if we win the other 7 we get 86 points.do you think we can lose 4 games and still finish in the autos
UTB
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Yes - of course; if we win the other 7 we get 86 points.do you think we can lose 4 games and still finish in the autos
UTB
We lost 9 games the season Bassett took us up in second place behind Leeds. Not 12.
Yes I know - but we got 84 points to go up in 2nd spot and the following season just 1 point more to go up with Leeds. My point was that Wilder, similar to Basset, plays shit-or-bust football. Unfortunately he didn't quite go that way in the derby but I still trust him to proceed to the end of season with that policy and we go up, though Leeds may have to wait till next season this time around!
Tufty always target wins but I suspect he's thinking if we win our home games that gives us 83 points and an excellent chance of top 2. A draw at Leeds and a couple of wins elsewhere and we'd be pretty much there. Now, just need to nail those wins at BDTBLIf we lose another 4, we need to win the other 7, and that would give us 86 points.... beating both promotion totals of 84 in 1989/90 and 85 in 1990/91. Would you bet against it?
Yes - of course; if we win the other 7 we get 86 points.

I wasn't predicting we'd lose 4 and win 7, but trying to make the point that we'd gone up auto under Bassett having lost a dozen games because he played shit or bust football, and that Wilder was cut from similar cloth - go out to win every game.we can't lose 4 games and expect autos by winning the others.
Doubt 86 will be enough.
I've always thought ELO were shit but they rate us by the look of it
I think you’ll need 89 points for automatic promotion this season, 93 to win the division. Basing accrual of points on season averages Norwich would finish on 92, Leeds on 88. We’re currently tracking for 85 but have been steadily improving over the course of the season so I think 89 is achievable. Perhaps with our GD 88 would be enough?
When you look at how many wins are needed for Norwich and Leeds to reach those totals it’s quite conceivable. Leeds would only need 7 wins from 11 games so we need to go some to finish above them. It’s possible.
Basically we need 24 points I think, 8 wins.
We need to win 8.
Also we need to win both these next home games and hope Leeds drop points at Bristol or Hull. If we fail to take six points from the next two games and Leeds win both theirs it will probably be over.
Those four dropped points from winning positions against Villa and Rotherham away are possible auto killers.
Not to mention the dropped point at home to Leeds right at the death.
Looking back at what has happened, we can all look at the silly games that has cost us points. Those have gone, we can only effect what's coming.
The only time they both can't maintain their average is when only games between them are left, otherwise they still can;Another missing when either season averages or form guides are used is the fact that teams will play each other in the last 10 games. So the teams meeting cannot both maintain either “average “.
The “strange” result period of the season will be soon upon us when pressure affects some and sudden motivation at the wrong end of the table affects others. I’d rather we played lower ranked teams at home, which we have.
The only time they both can't maintain their average is when only games between them are left, otherwise they still can;
Team A averages 2 pts a game
Team B averages 2 pts a game
Team A beats Teams C and D but loses to Team B, average 2pts
Team B beats teams A and D but loses to C, average 2pts.
OK then, replace with Teams L and M which are both rubbish but manage one of your unexpected results against Team BIf teams C and/or D average 2pts in either “table” also your theory is disproved.
OK then, replace with Teams L and M which are both rubbish but manage one of your unexpected results against Team B![]()
Yep, as said elsewhere, we can analyse as much as we want, it's a rough guideline as to where we are and where we could be but just that.True. As the saying goes lies,dammed lies and statistics !
I've always thought ELO were shit but they rate us by the look of it
Yep, obviously it gets more accurate as the weeks go on, still in our own handsSo second or third still a toss up. That's just how it feels. How critical is getting a result Saturday.COYRAWW.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?