Champagneblade
Stop moaning and get on with it
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2010
- Messages
- 14,609
- Reaction score
- 41,025
A couple of days ago I was looking at the threads on a few sites and noted one which stated that Bolton had a good transfer window.
They brought in Alnwick from Peterboro, Ameobi from Newcastle, Henry from Wolves, Anderson from Palace and Thorpe from Rotherham.
Not a bad last day. Experienced keeper, couple of wingers, centre half and a striker.
Then this morning I read how they have been under transfer embargo since December.
What sort of embargo is this? 5 signed all from the league above, one of them a perm deal.
Aren't these embargos meant to penalize those who cannot follow the rules? It seems not so. Like probably 80% of the division the embargo means they cannot pay fees, but yet when they can still offer good wages and freely sign relatively expensive loans, then what penalty is that?
I would have thought no signings, even having to use the youth team, would have been more relevant for teams who simply refuse to follow the same rules as everyone else until they could.
It also makes a farce of the Alnwick signing. Asks to go on list for personal reasons. Next minute he's rocking up at another club in the same division, probably on an improved deal having left for nothing. This personal reasons, it couldn't relate to the fact Bolton can't sign a player for a fee could it?
It seems at our level this sort of penalty is no penalty at all.
Nothing to do with Bolton's league position, it's the fact that similar to the West Ham debacle, there seems a real fear of punishing teams for not following the rules. Yet in non-league you get regular points deductions and in the case of Ilkeston, their games not played and punishment for not being able to honour them.
Anyone else thing such clubs didn't ought to be able to get away with it?
They brought in Alnwick from Peterboro, Ameobi from Newcastle, Henry from Wolves, Anderson from Palace and Thorpe from Rotherham.
Not a bad last day. Experienced keeper, couple of wingers, centre half and a striker.
Then this morning I read how they have been under transfer embargo since December.
What sort of embargo is this? 5 signed all from the league above, one of them a perm deal.
Aren't these embargos meant to penalize those who cannot follow the rules? It seems not so. Like probably 80% of the division the embargo means they cannot pay fees, but yet when they can still offer good wages and freely sign relatively expensive loans, then what penalty is that?
I would have thought no signings, even having to use the youth team, would have been more relevant for teams who simply refuse to follow the same rules as everyone else until they could.
It also makes a farce of the Alnwick signing. Asks to go on list for personal reasons. Next minute he's rocking up at another club in the same division, probably on an improved deal having left for nothing. This personal reasons, it couldn't relate to the fact Bolton can't sign a player for a fee could it?
It seems at our level this sort of penalty is no penalty at all.
Nothing to do with Bolton's league position, it's the fact that similar to the West Ham debacle, there seems a real fear of punishing teams for not following the rules. Yet in non-league you get regular points deductions and in the case of Ilkeston, their games not played and punishment for not being able to honour them.
Anyone else thing such clubs didn't ought to be able to get away with it?