LondonBlade89
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2018
- Messages
- 3,255
- Reaction score
- 8,864
On some level I hear what you’re saying but I don’t think anyone in this thread has been comparing Souza with Alzate, or suggesting that they’d be happy to let Souza go because we’re getting Alzate. If one person has, I apologise, but it’s not been a narrative throughout. Your logic would make it nearly impossible to comment on anything like this because of all of the caveats. I would raise the negatives you mention about Souza because I think it’s a limiting factor in his valuation. I would be OK with Souza going based on him presumably wanting to leave and us presumably needing to raise fees to sign people. I am presuming if Souza goes he’ll be more than adequately replaced. Of course I wouldn’t be OK with him going if we replaced him with a shithead. Even with all of the negatives raised about Souza - he is often unfit, he didn’t look great in the Prem, he has a habit of going missing when the chips are down - I’d definitely sooner he stayed. But what kind of shitpost it would be if everything we said had to involve some kind of decision tree.This thread is comical.
People complain about going backwards, selling better players and replacing them with inferior.....
Then I see this post littered with :
Souza overrated, unfit, doesn't play enough, now 26, didn't make it in the prem (with one of the worst prem teams on record)....
Replace with
Alzate whos:
a) Older than Souza
b) inferior to Souza
c) Didn't make it in the Prem with a much better team
d) Has played considerably less football than souza over his career.