He’s the new Luke Freeman, hyped up based on not a lot.
Like Morgan "5 games for Swansea and a handful of sub appearances for Wolves" Gibbs-White?
Newsflash : young players aren't going to have years of records and stats to judge them on - because they're young.
The question is do we want to be chancing on the young players like Twine or do we want to be the 3rd club in the chain and pay the inflated fees, once a player has proven themselves?
Do we want to be buying the likes of Oli McBurnie from Bradford for £250k, like Swansea? Or do we want to be buying those sorts of players (with an extra season's exposure) from the likes of Swansea - for £20m?
Luke Freeman is a totally different case and pretty irrelevant comparison.
Twine is a relatively unexposed, but clearly talented young player with plenty of spark. Freeman was bought two years too late, and for about £5m too much.
As another example, Ollie Watkins scored 21 in 68 for Exeter in League Two and went to Brentford for £1.8m.
They sold him to Villa for £30m.
Twine has scored 20 in 45 for MK Dons in League One, as well as goals in League Two for Swindon and Northampton.
He's proving himself already. Someone will buy him cheap, like Brentford, and they will make a hatful of money on him by selling him to someone like Villa.
Please let's be Brentford this time, not Villa.
(EDIT - I was interested so I had a look...Freeman has scored 42 goals in 372 career appearances and is 30 years old. Twine is 22 and has 42 goals in 151 appearances. You're free to make your own mind up but those numbers speak volumes!)