Praise for McCabe, The Prince and SUFC

[pommpey]

Maybe, in the end, it's just a convenient way of expressing McCabe hatred?
We're playing well, have a good manager and haven't sold anyone (in fact bought a few)
Perhaps it's all that's left?

There's no 'hatred'. I have never said 'I hate McCabe'.

Try to understand that the more you try to drag this discussion away from the subject and toward my assumed shortcomings, the more ridiculous you sound.

Likewise, I don't hate the Desso. I hate things which can be hated, and they are pretty small in number. Sheffield Wednesday, paedos and ISIS adequately fit the bill.

pommpey

 

[pommpey]

Well no it isn't zero. Have another guess.








Huddersfield Town ?

You silly silly boy.

They won away at Burton this season, too. And QPR, Brentford and (shrieks!) Rochdale in the cup.

pommpey

 

[Barney]

Well no it isn't zero. Have another guess.








Huddersfield Town ?

You silly silly boy.

Zero to one. Damn, my entire point has been rendered invalid.

 

[derfblade.3]

Likewise, I don't hate the Desso. I hate things which can be hated, and they are pretty small in number. Sheffield Wednesday, paedos and ISIS adequately fit the bill.

....you forgot semolina.....ruined my life having to swallow a bowl of that sick!

 

[Sean Thornton]

Zero to one. Damn, my entire point has been rendered invalid.

Pretty much. You said there were err, zero. Which was 100% wrong.

Where do you get your information from? Www.justmakeitupandspoutit.com?

Not a reliable source Barney. Poor Pommpey gave you a like as well

 

[Harrisblade]

There's no 'hatred'. I have never said 'I hate McCabe'.

Try to understand that the more you try to drag this discussion away from the subject and toward my assumed shortcomings, the more ridiculous you sound.

Likewise, I don't hate the Desso. I hate things which can be hated, and they are pretty small in number. Sheffield Wednesday, paedos and ISIS adequately fit the bill.

pommpey

OK, let's get back to the Desso.
The only point I'm trying to make is that most good players can play better on a surface that's true.
On it's own it won't guarantee anything but it might help if you have the right sort of team.

 

[metalblade]

Just popped back to see if silly season is still running, may as well talk to the wall pommpey & Barney there is no fucker as blind as those what don't want to see.

 

[Esablade]

Anyone told Esa that Barneys got out of the back yard and is currently shagging someone else's leg?

You must surely get tired of having your arse handed to you time and time again?

 

[Tunstall Fred]

The Sky Reporter watching the game told us how Lavery was injured, and Rodders has confirmed it. You have absolutely nothing to offer apart from your poor effort at sophism. The injury wasn't attributable to the pitch. It was (as it seems) an impact injury due to the scramble. So your argument that poor surfaces has had some or other effect is void. Lavery came away from BP this afternoon with a non-playing surface-attributable injury. And you can't tell me if any other injuries this season are attributable to the playing surfaces.

Why are you still here, save to try to save your own sorry arse?

pommpey

I wasn't watching Sky,so how could I know what he said,but let's return to the question you posed in post 157...the question you asked and which I answered was the following.....Q..How many of our players come back from away games nursing crocks as a result of shit away pitches...now my very reasonable answer was that Lavery was injured today after playing on a shit pitch,no where did I say it was attributable to the pitch,because that wasn't the question you posed was it,and I wasn't at the game so couldn't answer if the pitch was directly responsible.

I don't see anything in the above to make you so very angry like you appear to be

 

[pommpey]

I wasn't watching Sky,so how could I know what he said,but let's return to the question you posed in post 157...the question you asked and which I answered was the following.....Q..How many of our players come back from away games nursing crocks as a result of shit away pitches...now my very reasonable answer was that Lavery was injured today after playing on a shit pitch,no where did I say it was attributable to the pitch,because that wasn't the question you posed was it,and I wasn't at the game so couldn't answer if the pitch was directly responsible.

I don't see anything in the above to make you so very angry like you appear to be

So, your answer wasn't an answer to my question, yeah?

It's like:

"How many pigfans were in the pub?"

"Six. There were six blokes wearing blue and white scarves."

Complete non-qualifier. Keep going though. This is fucking priceless.

pommpey

 

[pommpey]

OK, let's get back to the Desso.
The only point I'm trying to make is that most good players can play better on a surface that's true.
On it's own it won't guarantee anything but it might help if you have the right sort of team.

BINGO! So, talent over playing surface.

Fuck me. I knew that if I tried, you'd see the fucking truth from the bullshit.

pommpey

 

[Tunstall Fred]

So, your answer wasn't an answer to my question, yeah?

It's like:

"How many pigfans were in the pub?"

"Six. There were six blokes wearing blue and white scarves."

Complete non-qualifier. Keep going though. This is fucking priceless.

pommpey

Please read my reply in post 219 again properly this time,and then tell me I haven't answered your question that you posed in post 157

 

[pommpey]

Please read my reply in post 219 again properly this time,and then tell me I haven't answered your question that you posed in post 157

My question was:

"How many of our players come back from away games nursing crocks as a result of shit away pitches"

Your answer to my question was:

"I wasn't watching Sky,so how could I know what he said,but let's return to the question you posed in post 157...the question you asked and which I answered was the following.....Q..How many of our players come back from away games nursing crocks as a result of shit away pitches...now my very reasonable answer was that Lavery was injured today after playing on a shit pitch,no where did I say it was attributable to the pitch,because that wasn't the question you posed was it,and I wasn't at the game so couldn't answer if the pitch was directly responsible."

Which, apart from being a bit indecipherable and a bit odd seems to answer, then not answer my question.

I asked if any players had been injured because of the pitch and you said yes (in red) and then disqualify that by saying it wasn't attributable to the pitch (blue) and further dug yourself a hole by the purple bit. If your attempt at sophistry stretches to the semantics about Lavery playing and injuring himself on the pitch as two entirely unconnected issues, then fine. But that fucks up your opening gambit and further fucks up your attempt to connect them in the first instance and your insistence in the past that Desso pitches reduce injuries. You have no proof of any of that, even with Lavery, away pitches, cowfields, scans on Monday or Kevin fucking McCabe.

So, back to my original question. Why are you here?

pommpey

 

[metalblade]

My question was:

"How many of our players come back from away games nursing crocks as a result of shit away pitches"

Your answer to my question was:

"I wasn't watching Sky,so how could I know what he said,but let's return to the question you posed in post 157...the question you asked and which I answered was the following.....Q..How many of our players come back from away games nursing crocks as a result of shit away pitches...now my very reasonable answer was that Lavery was injured today after playing on a shit pitch,no where did I say it was attributable to the pitch,because that wasn't the question you posed was it,and I wasn't at the game so couldn't answer if the pitch was directly responsible."

Which, apart from being a bit indecipherable and a bit odd seems to answer, then not answer my question.

I asked if any players had been injured because of the pitch and you said yes (in red) and then disqualify that by saying it wasn't attributable to the pitch (blue) and further dug yourself a hole by the purple bit. If your attempt at sophistry stretches to the semantics about Lavery playing and injuring himself on the pitch as two entirely unconnected issues, then fine. But that fucks up your opening gambit and further fucks up your attempt to connect them in the first instance and your insistence in the past that Desso pitches reduce injuries. You have no proof of any of that, even with Lavery, away pitches, cowfields, scans on Monday or Kevin fucking McCabe.

So, back to my original question. Why are you here?

pommpey

Is he here to get schooled ?

 

[pommpey]

Is he here to get schooled ?

Metal - it's like speaking with Scientologists. The more they talk, the more you realise how brainwashed they are, until pity kicks in.

pommpey

 

[Tunstall Fred]

My question was:

"How many of our players come back from away games nursing crocks as a result of shit away pitches"

Your answer to my question was:

"I wasn't watching Sky,so how could I know what he said,but let's return to the question you posed in post 157...the question you asked and which I answered was the following.....Q..How many of our players come back from away games nursing crocks as a result of shit away pitches...now my very reasonable answer was that Lavery was injured today after playing on a shit pitch,no where did I say it was attributable to the pitch,because that wasn't the question you posed was it,and I wasn't at the game so couldn't answer if the pitch was directly responsible."

Which, apart from being a bit indecipherable and a bit odd seems to answer, then not answer my question.

I asked if any players had been injured because of the pitch and you said yes (in red) and then disqualify that by saying it wasn't attributable to the pitch (blue) and further dug yourself a hole by the purple bit. If your attempt at sophistry stretches to the semantics about Lavery playing and injuring himself on the pitch as two entirely unconnected issues, then fine. But that fucks up your opening gambit and further fucks up your attempt to connect them in the first instance and your insistence in the past that Desso pitches reduce injuries. You have no proof of any of that, even with Lavery, away pitches, cowfields, scans on Monday or Kevin fucking McCabe.

So, back to my original question. Why are you here?

pommpey

My answer to your original question posted in 157,was in my reply in post 159

 

[Harrisblade]

BINGO! So, talent over playing surface.

Fuck me. I knew that if I tried, you'd see the fucking truth from the bullshit.

pommpey

Where did I ever suggest that a Desso pitch would improve a poor player?
But you can count this as some sort of victory if it makes you happy

 

[metalblade]

Metal - it's like speaking with Scientologists. The more they talk, the more you realise how brainwashed they are, until pity kicks in.

pommpey

Maybe he is thinking of Simon Webster or Brian Smith hahahahahahaha

 

[pommpey]

My answer to your original question posted in 157,was in my reply in post 159

And it isn't an answer to my question.

My question (if you read it correctly) contains the qualifier 'as a result of', which any person with a comprehensive understanding would understand the cause and effect principle.

Your answer was non sequitur and now you are trying to back pedal out of looking a cretin. I asked you to qualify it with proof as you felt you'd made a point. You couldn't and still can't and are making a real shit go at bending this into the top corner with your boots on backwards.

Keep going lad.

pommpey

 

[pommpey]

Where did I ever suggest that a Desso pitch would improve a poor player?
But you can count this as some sort of victory if it makes you happy

So, with a Desso, a shit manager and shit players, you get 'eleventh in Division One'.

With good players and a good manager and a Desso, you get 'Top of the League'.

Do you need algebra for this?

pommpey

 

[Tunstall Fred]

And it isn't an answer to my question.

My question (if you read it correctly) contains the qualifier 'as a result of', which any person with a comprehensive understanding would understand the cause and effect principle.

Your answer was non sequitur and now you are trying to back pedal out of looking a cretin. I asked you to qualify it with proof as you felt you'd made a point. You couldn't and still can't and are making a real shit go at bending this into the top corner with your boots on backwards.

Keep going lad.

pommpey

I answered your question that Lavery had got injured today after playing on a poor away surface

You have yet again taken it as another excuse to get angry,something you seem to do on a regular basis

 

[pommpey]

I answered your question that Lavery had got injured today after playing on a poor away surface

You have yet again taken it as another excuse to get angry,something you seem to do on a regular basis

Again, I am far from angry. I am amused. Your diminishing attempts to save face here are laughable.

As far as we know, Lavery's injury wasn't attributable to the playing surface. Your 'answer' wasn't an 'answer', and you weren't in any position to offer it as an answer anyway. It was an attempt to make a point, and that point is invalid.

Keep digging. The chamber marked 'owned' is a few spadesful away.

pommpey

 

[Tunstall Fred]

Again, I am far from angry. I am amused. Your diminishing attempts to save face here are laughable.

As far as we know, Lavery's injury wasn't attributable to the playing surface. Your 'answer' wasn't an 'answer', and you weren't in any position to offer it as an answer anyway. It was an attempt to make a point, and that point is invalid.

Keep digging. The chamber marked 'owned' is a few spadesful away.

pommpey

I have been consistent in my replies to you,I answered your question posed,and now along comes the Internet victory claim

 

[Harrisblade]

So, with a Desso, a shit manager and shit players, you get 'eleventh in Division One'.

With good players and a good manager and a Desso, you get 'Top of the League'.

Do you need algebra for this?

pommpey

Exactly what I said in #59 -
"Of course it's to do with Wilder, no-one doubts that, but even through your hatred of the bloody Desso, it's still got to be easier for the players to exhibit their undoubted skills on than a cabbage patch.
Why do you have a problem with trying to gain every advantage we can?

#59"

 

[metalblade]

I have been consistent in my replies to you,I answered your question posed,and now along comes the Internet victory claim

Fred just admit it you farted and followed through

 

[Tunstall Fred]

Fred just admit it you farted and followed through

Tell you what,you admit you are totally embarrassed about claiming we are going to Emulate Blackpool and I will consider it

 

[pommpey]

Exactly what I said in #59 -
"Of course it's to do with Wilder, no-one doubts that, but even through your hatred of the bloody Desso, it's still got to be easier for the players to exhibit their undoubted skills on than a cabbage patch.
Why do you have a problem with trying to gain every advantage we can?

#59"

Is it an advantage? How did Fleetwood manage to outplay us at home, then? Southend? This is 'this season', by the way.

I have no problem with advantages. It's why I an so harshly critical when McCabe deigns to flog our best advantages, namely talented players.

pommpey

 

[pommpey]

I have been consistent in my replies to you,I answered your question posed,and now along comes the Internet victory claim

You didn't answer the question. You offered an answer which had nothing to offer as an answer. Now you are feeling sorry for yourself too.

You ... are owning you. Not me. I am doing nothing but kick this dog turd of a debate back in your face. Nothing you have said over this wearily gash dialogue upholds your point. Keep going though, if you feel you must.

pommpey

 

[Tunstall Fred]

You didn't answer the question. You offered an answer which had nothing to offer as an answer. Now you are feeling sorry for yourself too.

You ... are owning you. Not me. I am doing nothing but kick this dog turd of a debate back in your face. Nothing you have said over this wearily gash dialogue upholds your point. Keep going though, if you feel you must.

pommpey

Question you posed in 157 I answered in 159

 

[pommpey]

Question you posed in 157 I answered in 159

It wasn't answered.

pommpey