blader
Well-Known Member
Wow yeah that’s the same, good point!I blame Campbell for their 1st goal, he lost the ball and 24 minutes later they score, shocking
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Wow yeah that’s the same, good point!I blame Campbell for their 1st goal, he lost the ball and 24 minutes later they score, shocking
There were at least half a dozen chances to stop that attack/ goal, both on the left side and the rightPeck doesn’t give it away, they don’t counter and score that spozzy goal.
Absolute tosh !I blame Campbell for their 1st goal, he lost the ball and 24 minutes later they score, shocking
Certainly grew into the game struggled first 30I thought Sydie Peck had a really good game against decent opposition.
Moved it on well, got a foot in when it was needed and joined in attacks.
Would love to know the XG on his chance on the edge of the area. Probably about 0.05.
"Should have scored."
He gave possession away by scoring.Absolute tosh !
Campbell didn’t lose the ball once in the (his) entire game![]()
Don’t talk out of your arse,he was 20 yards out. Maybe he should have done a keepy uppy for a couple of seconds,tapped it up onto his shoulder the hammered in the top corner,he had plenty of time to do that.He had time to compose and put it on target. He is a professional player and maybe cost us a couple of points.
Harrison Burrows shit one on one defending was the main reason we conceded.Thought he was quite tidy but it can’t go unnoticed his error led to the equaliser, which was disappointing
You don’t half talk some shiteNot massively convinced by him tbh. Looks a tidy player but not much more than that to my eyes. We definitely require an upgrade.
He did loose the ball for their equaliser so technically you could blame him.He took a great first touch, struck it sweetly but just a touch too high. Blaming Peck for us not winning is laughable.
Could be right. Doesn’t mean Peck is blameless though, it was still poor from himHarrison Burrows shit one on one defending was the main reason we conceded.
I thought Sydie Peck had a really good game against decent opposition.
Moved it on well, got a foot in when it was needed and joined in attacks.
Would love to know the XG on his chance on the edge of the area. Probably about 0.05.
"Should have scored."
It's called having a difference of opinion.You don’t half talk some shite![]()
Totally agree the lad has been chucked in the deep end and is doing ok.Peck is a young lad who, if we'd not had injuries and had money would likely have been out on loan in league 1 until Christmas (like Arblaster).
I think he was better than Souza today but he's suspect at times. Needs too long on the ball. Not strong enough. Not great at tracking runs.
He's going to make mistakes. He's going to be inconsistent.
But he's doing incredibly well, as is Seriki, One, Brooks etc considering.
We have to remember that we're top of the Championship and these lads have played a part in this.Totally agree the lad has been chucked in the deep end and is doing ok.
Brooks seems to have gone backwards and is struggling to get a much of a look in.
One was poor today admittedly in tough circumstances and probably wouldn't be near the 1st team if it wasn't for injuries.
Seriki is a funny one is positioning is really poor sometimes and he can look like bambi on ice with the ball, looks better going forward.
Not writing them off they are young lads and have been called upon due to injuries and our thin squad
Just think we need improvements if we are going to trouble the top two come the end of the season.
MoM for me ahead of O’HareAm I the only one who thinks he was poor today ? He should have scored in the first half at a crucial time and again in the second half when his fluffed effort lead to their equaliser.
Yes he does have qualities, but overall he is a weak link in our midfield.
Hamer is quite frustrating , not because he is poor , but because he's kind of "settled" for the level he's at , whereas with more effort , he could be much better - he has the vision & skills.That's all true and I wouldn't try and change him but he also loses possession in dangerous positions when it looks harder to turn the ball over than just play a simple pass
I find it infuriating but like I say I wouldn't try and change him
I do question his fitness levels though, if he ever decides to squeeze every last drop out of his potential then he will need to. Work on this but what a player he could be
Think you are 100% spot onIf I'm being honest, Peck worries me a bit. Think he's got great potential, but isn't ready for this role.
He isn't comfortable enough, which makes him generally too negative with the ball. Loads of times even in space he spins directly to passing backwards.
I think he's going to be a good midfielder, but at the minute (and it does pain me to say) he's our weakest link.
We now know Souza carrying a hammy problemThe problem for Peck is how do you follow Blaster, especially as you’re a different type of midfielder. I thought he was off it today not helped by possibly Souza’s worst game of the season. On the plus side O’Hare had his best game by a country mile
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?