Bladethebrian
Member
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2015
- Messages
- 363
- Reaction score
- 358
I was hoping to raise slightly more for the kids hospitalMaybe we can swap the red door for the roof.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
I was hoping to raise slightly more for the kids hospitalMaybe we can swap the red door for the roof.
Leeds aren’t falling apart, nothing will happen except he’ll get a £10k fine and be ordered not to spy again.
Will be brushed under the carpet as a non event
53 points; they would have got a draw against Wednesday even without cheating.
Fair enough - are there any repercussions for not following the charter, to your knowledge?
Rather than assume, why don't you read an article about it? Several links have been posted.I would Assume training grounds are private property and being there without invitation can be classed as trespassing
exactly.
The thing is that Leeds (and ourselves) have received a lot of plaudits because of the high energy, high fitness game, that forces errors.
He was on a public highway you could see through & over the fence. Therefore not trespassing. The police politely asked him to move on.
It's XI vs XI. Pulling a shirt at a corner will have more impact on the game that this once the whistle gets blown. Hardly anything gets made of that after the first few weeks of the season.This may be an unpopular view, but I think it's a load of palaver about nothing. There are few morals in football, and we see "cheating" - diving, "winning" penalties, gaining yards on throw-ins and free kicks, timewasting, feigning injuries - every week at most games. Much of this is condoned by pundits (tossers, most of them) and ignored by the authorities. We will have a strong view as a whole because historically we're not too keen on Leeds, but lets not put Lampard on some sort of pedestal - he did play for West Scam after all, and is part of the entitled "golden generation" (that's a laugh!). If Bielsa "spied" on us, I'd say it wasn't that effective as it was a very close game and there was only going to be a goal in it. Leeds took their chance. I agree that there's only a fuss because Lampard has blown it up and he's something of a media darling (fuck knows why!!). I'm no apologist for Leeds, but worse things happen in football and in the world. Let's move on?
I have to hand it to bielsa - everyone thinks he’s about to resign then he reveals he has a dossier for every team and he’s spied on them all!
I don’t see the issue - what advantage would he gain from watching us for example - 95% of the time we could all name who’s gonna play and the formation and tactics are hardly a secret are they.
He’s trying to get an advantage over his opponents, fair play.
Yeh it’s a strange one, he was found with pliers and a change of clothes whilst at the Derby training ground.
I thought that most trainings grounds were difficult to view. One side of the SU training complex can be viewed at a distance from the road but the other half of our training complex where our players train can’t be viewed from anywhere.
Think it’s a form of underhand (some would say clever) gamesmanship, cheating is too strong a word and to be fair apparently this is common practice in Argentina so maybe be thought it acceptable. Also there’s no method of knowing what advantage was gained and if that advantage made any difference to any LU score lines.
It’s bad what Bielsa has done but think it’s been blown out of proportion.
Suspect the EFL will give him a slap on the wrist with a small fine and warn him about his future conduct.
Looks like he is trying to bore everyone to the point that they will lose interest in it as an issue.
you should apply for Britain's Got Talent with that skillI would literally laugh my bollocks off if he resigned.
But training is supposed to be behind closed doors
You just didYou can say he needs to be punished but as there’s a law/rule not broken you can’t go round making punishments up. Therefore a slap on the wrists & fine is the likely outcome, with the rules then being changed with a sanction stating what punishment will be given if anyone is found doing it future
If there’s no advantage gained, why is he doing it for every match?
you should apply for Britain's Got Talent with that skill![]()
I can't get my head round this idea that points should be docked for not breaking any rules.He does it to give himself the best possible chance of winning an upcoming game.
With it being the first of its kind, you’ve got to assume nobody else does it (until proven).
Irrespective of the result, when they came to the Lane they knew more about us than we did about them. We could do extensive research on them but we wouldn’t have watched them train for this particular game. We failed to score - maybe spying contributed toward this. Maybe not but over the season it will have gained them some points.
Therefore he is gaining an unfair advantage in an unsportsmanlike fashion and for this deserves to be punished. Why not by way of points if they’ve gained points unfairly?
He hasn’t broke any rules ... because there isn’t a rule ... because can you imagine the size of the fucking rule book if you had to cover EVERYTHING that could or might happen.
His press conference was just plain arrogance.
If a rule isn’t there is it always the case that something that occurs isn’t unfair? As I said the rulebook can’t cover EVERYTHING just in case ANYTHING happens. Maybe they can now add it to the rulebook?I can't get my head round this idea that points should be docked for not breaking any rules.
and I presume it would only work onceNot quite sure it's suitable for the queen though.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?