SLB
Member
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2016
- Messages
- 621
- Reaction score
- 1,349
I don't believe so.can you loan both but only play one per game?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
I don't believe so.can you loan both but only play one per game?
That is unfortunateCant loan both in the Prem
And based on the SUTV videos, he seems like he's grown in to quite a character behind the scenes. I'd definitely like to see more of himDidn’t look remotely phased by the occasion when he came on & looked to use the ball when he had it. Big season coming up for him, will be interesting to see what happens.
Loan Doyle to Beerschot, then to us!We would have to buy one of them for that to happen.
I don’t think that can happen.Loan Doyle to Beerschot, then to us!
Ever heard of Brown envelopes?I don’t think that can happen.
Just like how they sold that guy to Southampton with a buy back clause there's plenty of way to work around that.Can't have two from premier league when you're in it I believe.
Yep, I’ve worked for a few football clubs but I don’t think the rules allow it. A loanee can’t be loaned on by the loaning club.Ever heard of Brown envelopes?
I need to watch the replay on tv tomorrow. I thought he looked poor and very phased by the occasion. But not always easy to tell from the stands. Be very happy to be wrong. UTBDidn’t look remotely phased by the occasion when he came on & looked to use the ball when he had it. Big season coming up for him, will be interesting to see what happens.
He wasnt as bad as fleck or norwood. Used the ball when he had itI need to watch the replay on tv tomorrow. I thought he looked poor and very phased by the occasion. But not always easy to tell from the stands. Be very happy to be wrong. UTB
he should have started instead of fleck he gave us nothing and couldnt get anywhere near the city players its really sad to see how much he has declined over the last year him bash lowe and stevens have to be moved on this summerSeen him a couple of times now and can’t for the life of me understand why we don’t see more of him, especially considering other players that appear to be ahead of him
It would be nice to see him being inadequate at least on one occasion before we got rid of him.Seen him a couple of times now and can’t for the life of me understand why we don’t see more of him, especially considering other players that appear to be ahead of him
I know we need to get rid of a lot of the squad but not 105 of themflecks finished for me like billy father time has beckoned them in like a go cart rental , times up
Hecky has ear marked around 105 players according to the Athletic and other sites
It's been winding me up for ages that he isn't getting any game time. I get him not starting, but he absolutely should have been coming on instead of Fleck. Every single time.Got shot down when I said he should be in squad ahead of past it Fleck![]()
Fleck hauled off vs Brizzle at half time because he was frighteningly off the pace....It's been winding me up for ages that he isn't getting any game time. I get him not starting, but he absolutely should have been coming on instead of Fleck. Every single time.
Hopefully the next few games he can be given some game time. No reason why we can’t rest Berge a bit. He hardly has a summer off either.Seen him a couple of times now and can’t for the life of me understand why we don’t see more of him, especially considering other players that appear to be ahead of him
Why? Fleck has been coming off the bench and doing a job helping ensure we get 3 pointsIt's been winding me up for ages that he isn't getting any game time. I get him not starting, but he absolutely should have been coming on instead of Fleck. Every single time.
You obviously pick the players with the experience over ones who've hardly played. As you say, neither responsible for the goals and we held them for most of the first half.i thought Norwood did pretty well, considering.I think it's pretty clear that Norwood and Fleck got the nod yesterday because we wanted/needed to be more solid than expressive through the center and fwiw, l don't think either of them, directly, had anything to do with the City goals. The responsibility for that falls somewhere else on they pitch.
Really like what I've seen of Coulibaly. Just want to see much more, he's calm on the ball, looks to be positive whenever possible, hasn't been overawed by any of the situation he's appeared in. Got a feeling he'll blossom next season
I wasn’t expecting him to start yesterday but he seems to get random minutes and then disappears again. He looks technically very good, passes the ball well and is very positive in his play. He is though naive and would benefit from game time but that’s up to Hecky. Arblaster is another that I would like to see more of. He had a full debut in autumn, played well, for a first start, then disappeared and then got injured. I really hope that once promotion is secure that we give minutes to these players instead of Fleck, Norwood, Sharp etc. we know what they can doYou obviously pick the players with the experience over ones who've hardly played. As you say, neither responsible for the goals and we held them for most of the first half.i thought Norwood did pretty well, considering.
I'm not seeing what everyone else is seeing in Coulibaly. He's looked ok when he's come on in games but nothing more. I suspect he won't be here next season given his contract is up, but who knows with the lack of communication from the club?
I'm much more excited to see Arblaster given a go if we clinch promotion. See what he can do.
I'd expect to see the likes of Brooks and Arblaster getting more minutes. Coulibaly will depend on whether he'll be here next year.I wasn’t expecting him to start yesterday but he seems to get random minutes and then disappears again. He looks technically very good, passes the ball well and is very positive in his play. He is though naive and would benefit from game time but that’s up to Hecky. Arblaster is another that I would like to see more of. He had a full debut in autumn, played well, for a first start, then disappeared and then got injured. I really hope that once promotion is secure that we give minutes to these players instead of Fleck, Norwood, Sharp etc. we know what they can do
Because when he's given the odd chance in the cup he looks good? He also started against Tottenham, so if he was good enough to be trusted against them why not again yesterday? Or multiple times in the league where he could have been brought on?Why? Fleck has been coming off the bench and doing a job helping ensure we get 3 points
. But no, bring a guy in with 1 minute of league experience because he's bound to be better. In fact, why not just sign a homeless guy up because football is so easy?
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?