My view, FWIW, is that when Hecky was appointed, it reeked of a cheap option. After the failed experiment with Slav, it felt to me as if the owner had picked a 'patsy' to manage the club, someone who wouldn't ruffle feathers or seriously challenge board decisions. Maybe that's part of the deal, manage the team but don't ask questions. When Hecky has been asked about transfer budgets and recently about the embargo, that's how it seems.
I think to everyone's surprise, he's actually done a really good job thus far. Results, as they say, speak for themselves.
However, there are now a few doubts creeping in. His apparent inability or hesitancy to change things. TBF he switched to a diamond formation during the Boro game, so a plan B of sorts, however it didn't make any difference. There are growing concerns regarding performances. I think the last all round team performance was Burnley at home and other than that, there have been maybe half a dozen games where the team has played to it's full capacity. Under Wilder it felt like the team were playing to capacity almost every game, so maybe we'd just been spoilt and this is actually the norm?
I must admit, I fail to see what Osborn brings to the team. I'm not one who normally singles out individuals, but he seems out of his depth most of the time. To me, ANY other option, injuries notwithstanding, would be an improvement, Brooks, Arblaster, Coulibaly... take your pick.
If this takeover finally goes through, it would not surprise me, regardless of what league we're playing in next season, if the new owner hires a new manager. Only then will we know if the grass was greener or is it better the devil you know.