HARRY MAGUIRE

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Would you take him back?

  • Yes, we'd be crazy not to

    Votes: 238 88.5%
  • No, he's burnt his bridges. Onto new blood.

    Votes: 31 11.5%

  • Total voters
    269

If that's correct, then I understand the sell on clause to be 15%

So:

15% x £9m = £1.35m

or is it: 15% x (£9m - selling price to Hull)

and that is the conundrum for today :)
 
If true, expect the rumour mill to go back on overdrive, and fans going ballistic that we're not spending the money on Bogle, Gregory etc. :rolleyes:
 
According to newsnow he's been linked with Everton and Southampton for 7Mill.

By the end of today he'll be going to Man U for 80 Mill...

And then by tomorrow it'll be a free to Wednesday allowing them to handover the 15% sell on fee, with a cheque for fuck all.
 
Of all the teams, please don't go to them...

But if they're stupid enough to pay silly money and we're on 15%...

It's a toughie.
 
He should be going for more than £10m without a shadow of a doubt.

Easily worth a punt for someone like Liverpool or Everton. Southampton need to replace Fonte so they could be an option. Whereas West Ham have just signed Fonte so don't really need him.

Regardless of receiving any sell on fee I don't think we'd spend it now, we'd barely have time to even consider reinvesting and I don't think we would anyway. I'd rather them sell him in the summer.
 
have never quite understood this so would appreciate anyone who knows explaining - is a sell on fee usually a % of the price sold for by the current club or is it usually a % of the profit made - so if bought for £2M and sold on for £5M it would be an agreed % of the £3M profit?
 
have never quite understood this so would appreciate anyone who knows explaining - is a sell on fee usually a % of the price sold for by the current club or is it usually a % of the profit made - so if bought for £2M and sold on for £5M it would be an agreed % of the £3M profit?
Percentage of profit. Only an idiot would pay a further 15% on top of the original fee.
 
Regardless of receiving any sell on fee I don't think we'd spend it now, we'd barely have time to even consider reinvesting and I don't think we would anyway. I'd rather them sell him in the summer.

Trouble is, the asking price may drop if Hull are relegated and so would our sell on windfall
 
Trouble is, the asking price may drop if Hull are relegated and so would our sell on windfall

I know, but they should still be able to get close to £10m as long as his form continues. And it'd be more likely to be immediately reinvested with the transfer window open.

have never quite understood this so would appreciate anyone who knows explaining - is a sell on fee usually a % of the price sold for by the current club or is it usually a % of the profit made - so if bought for £2M and sold on for £5M it would be an agreed % of the £3M profit?

It can be either. Although I'd imagine it will often only apply if a club sell a player for the same or more than what they paid.


It would be nice if Kyle Walker could move to Man Utd or City too. We've got 10% there so that could easily be £3m.
 
Harry could go for £10 million and Kyle for £25 million in the next 30min and we still wouldn't sign anyone else.
Our transfers are done I'm afraid.
Any money received via old player sales will go into covering the loses we are making, oh and maintaining the Desso:D
 

Today's Sun:

Harry will be offered £50k/week to stick with Hull if they beat the drop

Hull have no chance of keeping Harry should they go down with a host of Prem clubs keen on the £20m rated CB

Spurs and Everton have watched Harry intensely since Jan and would be in pole position to land him this summer

Pochettino has made signing a cb a priority
 
Today's Sun:

Harry will be offered £50k/week to stick with Hull if they beat the drop

Hull have no chance of keeping Harry should they go down with a host of Prem clubs keen on the £20m rated CB

Spurs and Everton have watched Harry intensely since Jan and would be in pole position to land him this summer

Pochettino has made signing a cb a priority

£20m is a good start, although I'd like to see that rise which I think it should do.

Spurs would be a great fit for him, I reckon. Hopefully he can be reunited with Kyle Walker for all of 5 minutes, before Walker buggers off to Bayern.
 
£20m is a good start, although I'd like to see that rise which I think it should do.

Spurs would be a great fit for him, I reckon. Hopefully he can be reunited with Kyle Walker for all of 5 minutes, before Walker buggers off to Bayern.

I can't see Walker leaving to be honest. He's onto something good with Spurs. They're the best team in the league in my opinion. Pochetino is the best manager in the league by far.
 
I can't see Walker leaving to be honest. He's onto something good with Spurs. They're the best team in the league in my opinion. Pochetino is the best manager in the league by far.

Wouldn't it be nice to play for a side that stays in the Champions League a bit longer than Spurs do, though? :D
 
I can't see Walker leaving to be honest. He's onto something good with Spurs. They're the best team in the league in my opinion. Pochetino is the best manager in the league by far.

The only team Walker should leave Spurs for is Barcelona. Barca don't really play with full backs and that would suit Walker down to the ground but the issue is that Barca don't have £60m to spend on a right back. When you look at the clubs who could afford Walker (Manchester United, Chelsea, Manchester City, Real Madrid, PSG, anyone in the Chinese superleague) it's a limited pool.
 
I can't see Walker leaving to be honest. He's onto something good with Spurs. They're the best team in the league in my opinion. Pochetino is the best manager in the league by far.

They need to start winning trophies to back it up.
 
The only team Walker should leave Spurs for is Barcelona. Barca don't really play with full backs and that would suit Walker down to the ground but the issue is that Barca don't have £60m to spend on a right back. When you look at the clubs who could afford Walker (Manchester United, Chelsea, Manchester City, Real Madrid, PSG, anyone in the Chinese superleague) it's a limited pool.

Barca look like signing Bellerin from Arsenal, which makes more sense due to age and price.

Bayern might be the most likely place for Walker, with Philipp Lahm for some reason deciding to retire.

If we're lucky we could receive up to £10m with the sell on clauses for Walker and Maguire. If we do I really think we should use the money and go for it.
 
Barca look like signing Bellerin from Arsenal, which makes more sense due to age and price.

Bayern might be the most likely place for Walker, with Philipp Lahm for some reason deciding to retire.

If we're lucky we could receive up to £10m with the sell on clauses for Walker and Maguire. If we do I really think we should use the money and go for it.

Not having a go at anyone, but can't understand the excitement people have of spending large wads of cash now. Obviously we need investment but as Wilder has showed you can pick many gems on loans and free transfers (whilst remembering signing on fees).

Bringing in a fancy 2 million pound player on 10k a week is no guarantee of success and perhaps not necessarily beneficial for the overall harmony.

I'd back him to get it right, a pragmatic approach is necessary. Such gossip will only mean other clubs will inflate their asking prices should we enquire about one of their players.
 
Citeh will spend big andv fullback will be a priority ,rumours of citeh buying both walker and rose
 
Not having a go at anyone, but can't understand the excitement people have of spending large wads of cash now. Obviously we need investment but as Wilder has showed you can pick many gems on loans and free transfers (whilst remembering signing on fees).

Bringing in a fancy 2 million pound player on 10k a week is no guarantee of success and perhaps not necessarily beneficial for the overall harmony.

I'd back him to get it right, a pragmatic approach is necessary. Such gossip will only mean other clubs will inflate their asking prices should we enquire about one of their players.

Having more to spend would only be a positive. In fact it would be the most exciting 'spending time' I can remember - because for the first time ever we've got a manager who won't stupidly waste it.

Wilder wouldn't break the wage structure. Nor would he sign 10 players instead of 6, just because he could.

It would be the same approach, just with higher quality players coming in.

10k p/w isn't a lot either. I'd imagine more than 2 or 3 of ours will be on that amount after promotion. And you won't sign good Championship players without at least going near that amount.

If we could go out and sign 2/3 players for around £2m who will be assets that would be brilliant.
 
Wonder if Harry's stock has a risen a million or two after yesterdays performance at Southampton?

Match of the Day commentator Alan Shearer commenting that he was the stand out performer and whilst I didn't actually count the number of times, he must have said "superb" on at least 3 occasions in his summing up
 
Maguire will probably be the main reason Hull stay up. He'll win their player of the season.

If I was manager of any of the top clubs I'd take a punt on him. He'd be a far better bet than many more expensive options. Like John Stones.
 

Kyle walker supposedly fallen out with Pochettino! could go a long way to finding our summer recruitment
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom