Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
But he was dogshit for us and burned serious rubber getting out of town when we were relegated, him being part of that team and showing zero fucks.
pommpey
ps: I have reported you because of your unfounded and unevidenced accusation
It really does feel like the whole website/forum needs a name change. It really isn't about the club anymore, it's all about Fallowfield. It got old a fair while ago.
The moderators owe me royalties as i keep the site afloat in advertising revenue
We may have earned it 6 weeks ago.The £170 million we earned about 6 weeks ago
Bollocks how?Bollocks how ?
I would say it’s bollocks to say spending minimal fees on players from leagues/teams nowhere near the level we need to be next year and to expect us to stay up is bollocks
Ken cmon I know your daft but I didn’t think you were this daftWe may have earned it 6 weeks ago.
But we don't get any of it till the season starts!
Bollocks how?
All you ever post is bollocks!
It’s not delusion there’s a direct correlation between threads created by me and the number of posts/popularity
It’s not my fault
But to be fair, no-one would ever award anyone like you a coaching badge.I’m not saying it’s not a good idea to try and sign those players but finding those is like a needle in a hay stack
Don’t be so ridiculous they’d never let someone like you in Harrods
Yeah. Same way I have a reaction score of 26k over 9k of messages
I'm literally shutting my dick in the drawer about it, I am
You're a funny chap, you know
pommpey
But to be fair, no-one would ever award anyone like you a coaching badge.
Congratulations pompy I can’t wait to hear more about the ratings you give players for games you haven’t even attended
I do know you are daft. You prove it with every post. This one in particularKen cmon I know your daft but I didn’t think you were this daft
Explain how I’m talking bollocks then DJ Baldy ? You and part time Portsmouth are like two school ground bullies
And it’s about time the moderators stepped in
Spending 40/50 million on 5/6 players. That's roughly 6 million per player.because those signings are relateable to us
I think we should be spending 40/50 mill on 5/6 top players we aren’t doing that
We are spending absoloute pittance and not even signing them permanently
I give you Brewster.There Is a direct correlation between the ammount you spend and the quality of players signed , not always but there is
The more you spend the better the player is
That’s a Fallowfield Fact
Anyone else notice that Fallowfield avoids answering comments he can't respond to?
That is embarrassing for Wolves, Leeds and Saints spending that much. All three were shite and two got relegated.For all those saying I’m a negative noo Noo these are last years competitors/relegation candidates from
Bournemouth - £80 mill
Brentford - £50 Mill
Palace - £45 Mill
Everton - £75 Mill
Fulham - £70 Mill
Leeds - £150 Mill
Southampton- £140 mill
Wolves £170 mill
All bottom half teams who we are competing with or would have last season
You are deluding yourself if you think spending £10 mill will be enough for us
The majority of those teams already had premier league starting elevens and were adding to squads
We have lost two of our best players and need to improve the starting 11 massively
To do that with 10 million is practically impossible
I'm not been negative I'm been realistic
I'm as excited as the next man for the new season it's just frankly outrageous that the prince has handicapped the club before a game has started
That is embarrassing for Wolves, Leeds and Saints spending that much. All three were shite and two got relegated.
£170m is the minimum TV money but it's over three years. £100m this season, £45m in 24/25 and £25m in 25/26. I've explained elsewhere why we don't have much left after paying our debts, the players' promotion bonuses and next season's wages.We have just recieved £170 million pound but cant afford to pay £3/4 million on a striker
The prince has brainwashed this fan base absolouteley crackers
Ampadu: 20/21 Sheffield United (EPL, relegated), 21/22 Venezia (Serie A, relegated), 22/23 Spezia (Serie A, relegated). There's a pattern there. Let's hope it repeats next season."direct correlation" - ok. Using your own logic, how did Chelsea get on last year with the amount they spent?
"the more you spend the better the player" - isn't true either. Because Leicester spent peanuts on both Mahrez & Kante. Look how they've turned out. Whereas, United spent £85M on Sancho & he's been woeful. Arsenal spent £72M on Pepe, who they loaned out last year & want rid off.
Also, whilst Ampadu has played in some good leagues, Prem with us & Serie A with Spezia. He's hardly been impressive at any instance...
Fixed the spends to the summer window and added further context in bold. I've put the teams in the order in which they finished, you should note that there's little correlation between net spend and finishing postion. I don't know why you've included Brentford, they are the new Brighton and were never in danger of relegation.For all those saying I’m a negative noo Noo these are last years competitors/relegation candidates from
Brentford - £45m spend
Fulham - £55m spend, £20m income (net £35m spend)
Palace - £30m spend, £5m income (net £25m spend)
Chelsea
Wolves £120m spend, £50m income (net £70m spend)
West Ham - £170m spend, £15m income (net £155m spend)
Bournemouth - £25m spend
Forest - £145m spend, £5m income (net £140m spend)
Everton - £70m spend, £60m income (net £10m spend)
--------
R Leeds - £105m spend, £105m income (net nil)
R Leicester - £15m spend, £75m income (net £60m income)
R Southampton- £70m spend, £5m income (net £65m spend)
£170m is the minimum TV money but it's over three years. £100m this season, £45m in 24/25 and £25m in 25/26. I've explained elsewhere why we don't have much left after paying our debts, the players' promotion bonuses and next season's wages.
Ampadu: 20/21 Sheffield United (EPL, relegated), 21/22 Venezia (Serie A, relegated), 22/23 Spezia (Serie A, relegated). There's a pattern there. Let's hope it repeats next season.
Fixed the spends to the summer window and added further context in bold. I've put the teams in the order in which they finished, you should note that there's little correlation between net spend and finishing postion. I don't know why you've included Brentford, they are the new Brighton and were never in danger of relegation.
I live in Bulgaria. I don't have a fucking clue what you are talking about. Can you repost it relating it to my adopted country.You shop in home bargains you get home bargains quality
You shop in b&m you get b&m quality
You shop in selfridges you get selfridges quality
You shop in Harrods (where fallowfield does his weekly shop) you get harrods quality
What am saying is that these transfers are very uninspiring they strike me as a panos Restos & Richard Zivkovic signings
Now you may call me a Debbie downer a fun vaccum etc but I don’t get it , these players may turn out to be half decent but you are asking players who have done decent in poor leagues to step up to the prem
It really is quite disappointing we needed a hell of a lot to compete IMO and that was before we lost Doyle & Macatee
Slag me off but I’m Spitfing Fallowfield Facts and no ammount of delusion will change that
Hecky was already Facing an uphill challenge the clown that’s pretending to sell the club has now tied one hand behind his back
£170m is the minimum TV money but it's over three years. £100m this season, £45m in 24/25 and £25m in 25/26. I've explained elsewhere why we don't have much left after paying our debts, the players' promotion bonuses and next season's wages.
Ampadu: 20/21 Sheffield United (EPL, relegated), 21/22 Venezia (Serie A, relegated), 22/23 Spezia (Serie A, relegated). There's a pattern there. Let's hope it repeats next season.
Fixed the spends to the summer window and added further context in bold. I've put the teams in the order in which they finished, you should note that there's little correlation between net spend and finishing postion. I don't know why you've included Brentford, they are the new Brighton and were never in danger of relegation.
All that effort Balham, and he won't listen. The nuances of football finance, especially at the higher levels, mean fuck all to him. It's just fucking FIFA24 for him, and the ownership and board should somehow fish cases full of fifties out of their own arseholes and bankrupt themselves personally just to buy players he rates on his Panini collection.
Apart from Ampadu - relegated in three consecutive seasons and no real fit anywhere in our lineup as an improvement - I don't hear anything from him regarding transfer targets and detailed, FIFA-coach level evidence either within or outwith our budget. As ever with the Hecky and Billy Sharp nonsense he spouts which stinks of personal taste over capability in the game his line is all gobshiting for attention rather than generating real debate about football and our club.
pompey
And neither do you. I know this.
pommpey
I've asked you this before, but I will ask again (because you keep avoiding answering):Most clubs take out a loan against the future TV/TRANSFER revenue that’s what all clubs do
I rate ampadu having watched him plenty of times for us and in Italy and for wales
The opinions around ampadu are based on the relegation season where he was by no means our worst player and people who haven’t even watched him play since
They are net spends but the revenue from sales is from big purchases before , you have to spend money in the Prem otherwise you stand still and you get relegated
I’m not suggesting we spend £80/90 million
If we spend £30/40 million and spent it wisely that could go a long way , the 3 players we have signed look decent and no one can judge whether they will be good enough until they play
However spending such a small ammount has made a difficult season much harder for hecky IMO
As for Brentford they aren’t as good as everyone made out last year they’ve lost Toney for half a season and I could easily see them in a relegation battle
You may call me a troll/attention seeker but if you take your bladey tinted glasses off and look at the bigger picture in terms of the squads around us
It’s us and Luton and then a huge gap to the teams above Burnley have just spend £20 mill on a striker
Ampadu is nesh. He is a good time player so exactly what we don't need in what will likely be a long, hard, backs-to-the-wall season.Most clubs take out a loan against the future TV/TRANSFER revenue that’s what all clubs do
I rate ampadu having watched him plenty of times for us and in Italy and for wales
The opinions around ampadu are based on the relegation season where he was by no means our worst player and people who haven’t even watched him play since
We don't have £30m. We have about £20m unless we either sell someone (bad idea) or raid next season's pot (worse idea). The scouting team (with their scouting badges) are doing what they can to bring in the 4-5 required players on an extremely limited PL budget.They are net spends but the revenue from sales is from big purchases before , you have to spend money in the Prem otherwise you stand still and you get relegated
I’m not suggesting we spend £80/90 million
If we spend £30/40 million and spent it wisely that could go a long way , the 3 players we have signed look decent and no one can judge whether they will be good enough until they play
However spending such a small ammount has made a difficult season much harder for hecky IMO
They'll be safely midtable again. 9th-13th. I'll even put £20 to the forum on them finishing 13th or above if you'll match it (assuming you're old enough to legally gamble).As for Brentford they aren’t as good as everyone made out last year they’ve lost Toney for half a season and I could easily see them in a relegation battle
I will do no such thing. We are going to be second favourites for relegation with good reason. Despite all the hype around Burnley and the amount they're spending they'll be third favourites for the drop. We're in a minileague with Luton, Burnley, Forest, Everton (who are in real trouble), Wolves, Bournemouth and one or two of the minor London clubs (West Ham, Palace, Fulham); we need to finish above three of them.You may call me a troll/attention seeker but if you take your bladey tinted glasses off and look at the bigger picture in terms of the squads around us
It’s us and Luton and then a huge gap to the teams above Burnley have just spend £20 mill on a striker
And now i know you certainly dont know who i am you plonker
You don't go to every game. I trust my source.
I also know this because you talk out of your arse so much.
You seem to be really, really worried about your identity being revealed. Why is this? Do you have something to hide?
Are you 'rattled' by this?
pommpey
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?