Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Nonsense. Pinchy has assured us he is signing and that as a result there is no point in signing anyone else.
I think he is signing yesterday.
(How many points dropped now since the loan window opened?)
I see you've recovered from the embarrassing knee-jerk about Paul Coutts and How Many-Nil Doncaster would beat us?
Recovered but, sadly, not learned.
He said tomorrow yesterday, not today, so if it's not today or yesterday it will be tomorrow's today... or tomorrow.If Max Goddard says he is signing then he must be
or next weekHe said tomorrow yesterday, not today, so if it's not today or yesterday it will be tomorrow's today... or tomorrow.
From some "ITK" on the Leicester City forum:
"My understanding is that SheffU are trying to get Hammond loaned "on the cheap" but LCFC are blocking things because they want them to pay more of his wages.
Hence the deal is off......for the time being."
Does sound about right for us.
From some "ITK" on the Leicester City forum:
"My understanding is that SheffU are trying to get Hammond loaned "on the cheap" but LCFC are blocking things because they want them to pay more of his wages.
Hence the deal is off......for the time being."
Does sound about right for us.
Someone send Jim a Tweet!
Take a Statin 58Jeez, I do hope that is bollox.
They've apparently been negotiating since before last transfer deadline day, when Hammond almost but not quite got over the line
So how the f'k can the club be fkin around still negotiating after all this time?
We've either agreed to sign him, or we can't afford him and should've moved on long ago ffs
Unless paying him more would take the club outside of FFP ....... Do you know if it would? (genuine question)From some "ITK" on the Leicester City forum:
"My understanding is that SheffU are trying to get Hammond loaned "on the cheap" but LCFC are blocking things because they want them to pay more of his wages.
Hence the deal is off......for the time being."
Does sound about right for us.
Take a Statin 58
Unless paying him more would take the club outside of FFP ....... Do you know if it would? (genuine question)
Who knows? What we do know is tho, we've saved Murphy's salary, which must have been one of the highest at the club, together with gathering in his fee, reported to be in the region of £1.5m and correct me if I'm wrong but Jimbob said that monies raised from the sale will go back into the fist team squad. Unless it's a play on words, I take that as being monies that NA can re-utilise for replacement(s).
Not disagreeing with you but if Murphy was being paid, say, £5K a week and Hammond is on a Premiership minimum £20K per week - if we are being required to pay £20K per week that would mean we are still looking to find best part of £300K just for a 3 month loan. And there would no doubt also be a loan fee plus agent fee. Soon eats into the £1.5K.
Ok MB, I understand that, but if NA wants better players and he has the funds to get them, then surely that's what the funds are for?
Unless paying him more would take the club outside of FFP ....... Do you know if it would? (genuine question)
Not sure FFP would let you do that .....Can't we just pay non of his wages but just give Leicester some money as a loan fee instead?
Don't tell em.Not sure FFP would let you do that .....
Don't tell em.
Max or anyone else who claims it know nothing, as NOTHING is coming out of the club from anyone or any department
Get with the programme, Edmund. He sends a direct message from his Twitter account to them both.Is it not plausible that Adkins drives to Max' school and hangs about the yard until break-time to tell Max the latest news, then drives to Mike "Strappy" Stephenson's work-place before returning to the office?
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?