Confirmed released list

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Now please think carefully.... If Wallace was on 2 year contract with one year option then why would we take up the one year option and then transfer list him immediately?? It is highly likely he signed a 3 year contract when he came to us and that your multiple news reports are wrong!

Silent, quite a few people thought the same as me that it was 2 plus 1. I am not sure why you're dragging this out but let's go with ok. I also still believe that clubs in England can't sign pre contract players in January and have to wait until a month before the contract is at an end. You quote Scotland which I initially said they can. It's not a pee fight and j left that.
 



well whats your argument with me , I turned against him when he let us down
what are you saying Im missing
I gave him a chance to do his job , when he didnt do it I wanted him to go

whats wrong with that

why did you want to keep him

which bit of logic am I missing
he admitted we needed some quality , he didnt get any

He's gone now, so luckily there's no need to have anymore mind numbing arguments about him with you.

Let's pick up again in January when you've decided that Wilder is a dickhead who released too many players.
 
Silent, quite a few people thought the same as me that it was 2 plus 1. I am not sure why you're dragging this out but let's go with ok. I also still believe that clubs in England can't sign pre contract players in January and have to wait until a month before the contract is at an end. You quote Scotland which I initially said they can. It's not a pee fight and j left that.
Yes you can. PL and FL are different leagues. Hammond is still registered PL player

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...nley-s-Danny-Ings-pre-contract-agreement.html
 
He's gone now, so luckily there's no need to have anymore mind numbing arguments about him with you.

Let's pick up again in January when you've decided that Wilder is a dickhead who released too many players.

you see your agenda driven , you think you can fortel the future
I go on what happens , and that was Adkins doing nothing to alter our destiny so he had to go
I think Wilders a good option
I can categorically state now hes done what we all knew was needed to be done so if hes a dick head , we all are
 
you see your agenda driven , you think you can fortel the future
I go on what happens , and that was Adkins doing nothing to alter our destiny so he had to go
I think Wilders a good option
I can categorically state now hes done what we all knew was needed to be done so if hes a dick head , we all are

You categorically stated a lot of things last time, then categorically stated the opposite shortly afterwards, so we'll see.
 
You categorically stated a lot of things last time, then categorically stated the opposite shortly afterwards, so we'll see.
all of which carried the caviats regarding Adkins adding to the squad as well you know
but being the twat you are are ignoring to mention that just saying I was fully behind him , which I was only on his keeping his promise to make said signings
 
Strange that my highlight of the season was yesterday. I've never been as ashamed of a group of united players in all my life. Some are unlucky with injuries, some were never going to be good enough, some are clearly past it but there is a large chunk of those players who are an utter disgrace to themselves, their families and professional football.

Wilder has done more in a week than fresh start Nigel did in a year.
 
all of which carried the caviats regarding Adkins adding to the squad as well you know
but being the twat you are are ignoring to mention

Hardly, you simply kept adding nonsensical bits to your silly arguments as you went along then pretending they were things you'd said all along.
A bit like when we were all negative idiots harming the club when we said we wouldn't get promotion.

Alas, it's done now, I look forward to more of your comedy next season.
 
Very amused by the Hammond comments though. This from a group of fans who made Nick fucking useless article Montgomery, who was just as bad, and given an equally ridiculous contract extension by that equally fucking useless article SemiPro, a club legend.

Sometimes I despair; sometimes it's a wry smile.

I was never the biggest Monty fan, but he was so much better for us than Hammond has ever been. Monty couldn't pass a ball but at least he could track back and mark a man. You didn't often see him gifting goals to the opposition like in Hammond's last appearance for us.
 
Most contracts have a comment around any other reasonable tasks deemed necessary to the business, although I wouldn't know if footballers have such a such a clause inserted, but that doesn't protect the employer from constructive dismissal actions. Constructive dismissal is either unfairly targeting them, or just generally forcing them to leave on their own accord. That doesn't mean asking them to do anything outside of their contract, you can stick to the contract and still be seen to be trying to force them out.
So in your example you could only do what was suggested if everyone else was having to do the same.
My general point being rather than banishing him from the club I'd make him earn his wages and there are plenty of tasks that are surely reasonable that he can do without us overstepping the mark. Players are continually working in the community, some as in Neil Collins are banished from all first team practices. It's quite legitimate and though treated as an outcast there's little the player can do. They're are means and ways around everything as long as we don't overstep the mark. As I said, within the boundaries of his contract
 
My general point being rather than banishing him from the club I'd make him earn his wages and there are plenty of tasks that are surely reasonable that he can do without us overstepping the mark. Players are continually working in the community, some as in Neil Collins are banished from all first team practices. It's quite legitimate and though treated as an outcast there's little the player can do. They're are means and ways around everything as long as we don't overstep the mark. As I said, within the boundaries of his contract
The important part is, so long as you are making others do the same. If you aren't you could be paying out a hefty sum, on top of his wages.
 



Bladespersons - It is our duty to make Dean Hammonds remaining time here as miserable as possible.
cracking statement of intent to transfer list everyone he doesn't like the look of!

But the real proof will be in the transfer dealings. If replacements aren't adequate all we've done is piss off a bunch of players that we'll be crawling back to come August.
Just how bad do you expect the replacements to be?
 
To put a bit of context on matters;

Most supporters were happy and encouraged at the time Hammond signed, and if this news surrounding the clause in his contract had been announced then, I'd suspect a much gentler reaction would have followed.
Sorry but I was just completely overwhelmed by another faceless chinless wonder coming in, I would only recognise Sharp and Adams if I was doing an ID parade on the entire squad. So I thought bellend..right enough he is one.
 
My general point being rather than banishing him from the club I'd make him earn his wages and there are plenty of tasks that are surely reasonable that he can do without us overstepping the mark.

Completely. With that I mind, I think now is the time for us to fully utilise Martyn Woolford's civil engineering degree and get him to finally remove the pillars from the Kop.
 
I was never the biggest Monty fan, but he was so much better for us than Hammond has ever been. Monty couldn't pass a ball but at least he could track back and mark a man. You didn't often see him gifting goals to the opposition like in Hammond's last appearance for us.

No fucking way our dog would ever be called Hammond
 
It's occurred to me that McCabe was fully aware of this contract obligation to Hammond and yet still felt the need to sack Adkins.

I know many will say he sacked him because of it and not despite of it, but it really is an unfortunate consequence of the past dire 4 months since the contract option was agreed. Just shows how 4 months is such a very long time in S2!!
 
It's occurred to me that McCabe was fully aware of this contract obligation to Hammond and yet still felt the need to sack Adkins.

I know many will say he sacked him because of it and not despite of it, but it really is an unfortunate consequence of the past dire 4 months since the contract option was agreed. Just shows how 4 months is such a very long time in S2!!

Woody , never mind 4 months . As in politics a day is a long time in S2.

As the dust settles on the Hammond fiasco , McCabe or another is more responsible than Adkins for this comedy club debacle . Not even method in the madness.

Bet it left Wilder speechless . Thought he had issues at Oxford and Northampton . Good job the bloke is good at balancing and spinning plates.

UTB
 
Well done Tufty. You've made an excellent start. Just what was needed. Very pleased in particular that you haven't succumbed to any Bladey drivel about Kennedy and De Juve. Have another look at Paul Coutts though. He's a very good footballer in need of nothing more than an injection of enthusiasm. Oh and beware acting on your mates' advice as seems to be thought a good idea by some on here. We don't want management by anyone's mates thank you...least of all by the crude, parochial, Bladey Blade brigade. Anyway, I digress. More impressed, so far than I expected to be. I might well use that season ticket after all...

Very amused by the Hammond comments though. This from a group of fans who made Nick fucking useless article Montgomery, who was just as bad, and given an equally ridiculous contract extension by that equally fucking useless article SemiPro, a club legend.

Sometimes I despair; sometimes it's a wry smile.

People liked Mongy cos he run around a lot, I've taken up running perhaps the same fans would like me centre mid.
 
It's occurred to me that McCabe was fully aware of this contract obligation to Hammond and yet still felt the need to sack Adkins.

I know many will say he sacked him because of it and not despite of it, but it really is an unfortunate consequence of the past dire 4 months since the contract option was agreed. Just shows how 4 months is such a very long time in S2!!


When was the contract option agreed?
 



All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom