It was me that Jim had the meltdown with earlier.
I sent a bit of sarcastic tweet at the end of today's match implying we had beaten a divisional powerhouse (this is after NA spent all week calling 2nd bottom Colchester dangerous ffs) and that I bet Jim is mega proud.
The Co-Chairman of our football club replied with:
"I am sure I don't deserve your silly abuse, pal. I'm glad to get the 3 points. Let's build a run of form.
#onwards"
I replied with a calm and rational reply of:
"You're the chairman of a massively underachieving football club, change that and the digs might stop
#youarenotmypal
Then rather than engage me in a civilised conversation he began to make out he was being continually abused personally.
So I sent him a private message to take things away from the public spotlight and to build a more calm conversational platform to maybe exchange opinions and dialogue.
Me "I see you don't reply when I make a reasoned come back. The word abuse is questionable also, you really should be a little more thick skinned if you are to continue to engage with a large disgruntled fanbase. The way your consortium has run the club over the last few years needs to be constantly questioned. We are not progressing in any way and you seem to be fine with that."
Jim "No it is not questionable. Your behaviour is moronical"
Me "Moronical? I'd say letting a club of SUFC's size fester in this division with a bloated squad paying wages to 34 Year Old journeymen and selling every bit of talent we have, is slightly more moronic than send the odd mocking tweet your way. You're a grown man in charge of a club with highly emotional local ties, expect some mocking if you are not achieving. If you don't either leave, change your ethos or close your account."
So there you go, the full story.
I've left the part out when he went on an ego massaging exercise, for the next 3 hours, conversing only with people who called him great and thanked him for being on twitter.
