Outgoing? Tom Cannon

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?




Slow of feet, slow of mind. Don't get the insistence. Maybe his finishing is AAA or something, whatever it is he has, we're not seeing it.
His finishing must be the only positive because nothing else is .

I think even stoke n Preston will be having 2nd thoughts on that viewing .
 
Shit scared of a physical challenge, can’t control a ball, no pace and total waste of a position in the team. Just get rid of him.
If you’re a striker:
Be big and difficult to shake off like Shipperly, Moore, etc.
Be quick and tricky like Ndiaye, Kabba etc.
Be a top marksman like Sharp or Edwards etc.

He comes nowhere near ticking any of those boxes. Maybe Stoke found a better way of using him but there is nothing to suggest this investment pays off for us. Oné on the other hand, you can see something to work with.
 
A (very, very) shit Scott Hogan. As much as I really disliked Hogan, at least he was strong and mobile.

Every good Wilder CF has been good physically. Sharp, Leon, Moose (for a time), Bamford, Campbell (when fit), even Madine and Moore. There's nothing about Cannons game that indicates, even if he was competent, that he'd be a success here.

£4£, the worst signing in the clubs history, as Brewster was at least bought with at least £90m of parachute payments guaranteed
 
I genuinely feel sorry for the lad
Forget the wages he's on etc.. he's a human being with feelings...
It's almost as though knows he's not up to it, he couldn't get off the field quick enough yesterday when the double substitution happened. He was the second one announced but was off the field even before the first one happened...
It was like "I hate it here and they hate me as a player too, fuck this.."

He's up there with Dougie Brown as the worst player seen by me in a United shirt, a shameful indictment....
Needs moving on for his and the clubs sake...
 
As a striker if you're not hitting the net that much you can still put a shift in, get at their defenders, chase them down, force an error, make something happen ffs.

Hes just lolloping about.

Cant afford passengers, God knows what the other players think when they're running their bollox off.
 
Now is the time to sell him.

His goals at Stoke are not quite a distant memory for some yet.

He’s still of an age just about to be perceived as young with potential.

With at least a couple of years left on his contract he’s not in that vortex yet that sucks value from him due to time left.

Optimise what we can this window then go again.

In fact using the money to go and buy the winger from Boreham Wood would be a surprisingly smart move for us.

Then perhaps loan a different type of forward.
You and your flipping common sense 🙄
 
I genuinely feel sorry for the lad
Forget the wages he's on etc.. he's a human being with feelings...
It's almost as though knows he's not up to it, he couldn't get off the field quick enough yesterday when the double substitution happened. He was the second one announced but was off the field even before the first one happened...
It was like "I hate it here and they hate me as a player too, fuck this.."

He's up there with Dougie Brown as the worst player seen by me in a United shirt, a shameful indictment....
Needs moving on for his and the clubs sake...
Ha ha….. Dougie Brown - now there a blast from the past!!! Relegation to 4th Division season 1980/81. Yes I remember him - he was truly awful - but sadly Cannon offers as little to the team as he did.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LSF
I am more than happy with Wilder as manager. I can't see any better option under these circumstances and he got 92 points only the season before last, with a lot of the same players we have now. But if he keeps starting Tom Cannon, he's going to find most of the fan base, including me, turning against him.

There will always be bad players and we'll make bad signings, every club does, but you cannot just keep playing him on the hope that he magically becomes something that resembles a footballer. He has absolutely nothing to offer.
 



We will have to pay for someone to take Cannon the dud...........its like spending a fortune on the biggest firework in the shop..taking it home on bonfire nite getting everybody excited about it...then the big moment comes you all gather to watch.....the touchpaper gets lit it burns...then nothing..........you are so disappointed that you spent all that money on a DUD.
 
Notwithstanding Cannons ability or lack of , playing up front in this team must be absolute purgatory for strikers .

We create very little and hardly get the ball into the box ,10 touches in the box yesterday.

Cannon and Bamford were poor but they were feeding of scraps 30 yards from goal generally losing the ball with little support around them .

Apart from the 1 on 1 chance , neither were wasteful in front of goal as they weren't in front if goal. Through balls were consistently over hit , too few crosses of any quality .

Although the transfer window extended into the season is bemoaned by managers including our own , it may well be our saving grace .
 
He’s absolutely abysmal. We shouldn’t be trying to give him away though as some people are suggesting. Yes, we clearly need funds but if we can loan him out with a fee and wages covered I’d accept that. With the idea of him doing well and getting a few more ££ for him in January/next summer.
 
His stats todays match with AI's view:

This was a poor, low-involvement performance for a centre-forward. Cannon received a 6.0 rating, which is below average and reflects limited impact. In 60 minutes he had only 15 touches — extremely low for any outfield player, especially a striker expected to be central to attacking play. He offered almost no goal threat and struggled to influence the game.Attacking contribution (very weak)
  • 0 goals, 0 assists, 0 chances created
  • 0 shots (on or off target) → shot accuracy 0/0
  • Only 2 accurate passes out of 6 (33% accuracy)
  • 0/1 successful dribbles
  • 2 passes into the final third and 1/1 accurate crosses (the rare positive)
  • 1 offside
Interpretation: Cannon was almost completely isolated or ineffective in the final third. A striker with zero shots and minimal progressive actions in an hour is a major concern. The single accurate cross and two final-third passes show he occasionally got into advanced positions, but he could not convert that into meaningful threat.

Defensive & work-rate side (modest)
  • 1 defensive contribution
  • 1 clearance (headed)
  • 1 recovery
  • 0 tackles
He put in a small amount of defensive work (typical for a modern striker who drops deep or presses), but nothing standout.

Duels & physical battles (poor)
  • Ground duels: 0/2 (0%)
  • Aerial duels: 1/5 (20%)
  • Fouled: 0 | Fouls committed: 1
  • Dispossessed: 0 (positive — he didn’t lose the ball when he had it)
Interpretation: He lost the majority of physical contests. As a striker, especially one who often relies on hold-up play or winning aerial balls, a 20% aerial success rate and zero ground duel wins is disappointing.
Can you ask AI how many times he was expected to win an aerial duel against their CBs?

Cannon's progress is being hampered by Kevin Blackwell-ball
 
In the few short minutes that Oné was on, he gambled on a header and had a shot on target (he was offside, but it was the right movement)... he then made a fantastic run down the left where he showed pace, power and balance and it nearly led to something.

Sadly, he pulled his hamstring in the latter event.. but he was so much more confident and decisive than Cannon in those two actions... If it's true that Oné is frustrated at his lack of game time, then it's understandable given who's keeping him out of the team.

The minutes we're investing in Cannon needs to go into Oné's development now. He's a better player and a home grown asset for the books. If any scouts were watching today, they'll have been left very intrigued about Oné, because his profile is rare.
Osula is already being spoken of as a £40m player...

That was the difference, for me, with One and any other striker we have.

When he made that run down the left, Brum had to put three players on him, to stop him, and he powered his way through at his first attempt, and they managed to get the ball at the second attempt. They would not need to use that sort of effort against anyone else, including Bamford.

If One had started the game, and had made that run in the first 10 minutes, the Birmingham team would have been on "Danger Warning" anytime he was near the ball, dragging their players with him and making space for our other players to exploit.

Just hoping he is not out for too long with the pulled hamstring.
 
Can you ask AI how many times he was expected to win an aerial duel against their CBs?

Cannon's progress is being hampered by Kevin Blackwell-ball

Yeah, that was terrible yesterday, hoofing it forward all the time.

Bamford managed to get to a couple of them, but mainly they were mopped up by the opposition.

That happens all over the pitch, for us, we have a shocking lack of height in the team.
 
You can't expect Cannon to be able to do much when he gets a high ball and is up against one of the 8ft tall Brum CB's just as Sharpe wouldn't have had any success.
BUT Sharpe would have niggled and annoyed the 8ft defender. What's baffling for me is that Cannon doesn't even try to be a nuisance. If he goes towards the goalie after a pass back he runs up and then slows down before he gets near, as if he's afraid to upset them.
Do we have a sports psychologist who could teach Cannon to get annoyed or aggresive? He could at least give whoever sends him the hopeless passes a gob full. He appears to have no 'pashun' as CW would call it - so even more baffling than Cannon having none is CW picking him regardless.
Or is it that he's just not our type of player and would be better off elsewhere?
 
You can't expect Cannon to be able to do much when he gets a high ball and is up against one of the 8ft tall Brum CB's just as Sharpe wouldn't have had any success.
BUT Sharpe would have niggled and annoyed the 8ft defender. What's baffling for me is that Cannon doesn't even try to be a nuisance. If he goes towards the goalie after a pass back he runs up and then slows down before he gets near, as if he's afraid to upset them.
Do we have a sports psychologist who could teach Cannon to get annoyed or aggresive? He could at least give whoever sends him the hopeless passes a gob full. He appears to have no 'pashun' as CW would call it - so even more baffling than Cannon having none is CW picking him regardless.
Or is it that he's just not our type of player and would be better off elsewhere?
He will end up in div 1 or 2 at best ok we may not play to his strengths but what are they? Doesn't show any anger at his fellow team mates when no service to him..Aggression! hasn't got any so what does he give us? Nothing ! what surprises me is Wilder seems to like him ! We have to move him on even at a loss frustrating player!
Yesterday he got a few boos and that will rev up if we have a poor season! seen it all before ! Has to go!.
 
Obviously he's being picked to try and justify the money Wilder spent, like with Brewster. I said yesterday when the defence sees his lack of aggression and awareness it gives them confidence from the off, does anyone ever see him fight for the ball or knock an opponent over, no, he's hopeless. We need to off load soon not hang about hoping he'll come good and at least use his wages to bring another striker in or start One
 
I am more than happy with Wilder as manager. I can't see any better option under these circumstances and he got 92 points only the season before last, with a lot of the same players we have now. But if he keeps starting Tom Cannon, he's going to find most of the fan base, including me, turning against him.

There will always be bad players and we'll make bad signings, every club does, but you cannot just keep playing him on the hope that he magically becomes something that resembles a footballer. He has absolutely nothing to offer.
I’m a wilder defender and I would’ve been absolutely fuming if anyone other than Cannon was the first sub yesterday. I’ve really tried to like Cannon, at one point he was looking like he could still be dangerous, playing off the shoulder of the last man but just not getting the ball/rub of the green but that’s long gone. Offers almost nothing and I don’t think it’s particularly hyperbolic to say we’d have been no worse off playing with 10 yesterday.
 
1. No chance we get that.
2. For him to move it would need to be a team playing 2 up front. They are a rare commodity these days. Finding a team with the funds and the formation is really threading the needle. I think he will be here until his contract runs out.
It's they way we roll buddy.
Invest £ms in fee & wages , get no value , then recoup fuck all after FIVE years 🙄
Think Brewster , not Liverpool
 
I’m a wilder defender and I would’ve been absolutely fuming if anyone other than Cannon was the first sub yesterday. I’ve really tried to like Cannon, at one point he was looking like he could still be dangerous, playing off the shoulder of the last man but just not getting the ball/rub of the green but that’s long gone. Offers almost nothing and I don’t think it’s particularly hyperbolic to say we’d have been no worse off playing with 10 yesterday.

I think it's clutching at straws to say that he can even play off the last man. He's had multiple one-on-one situations that he's fluffed (including one at Hillsborough). It's just an easy thing to say because we don't see much of that in today's game, and therefore the thing we don't see must be the thing he's good at.
 



All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom