Shittest Blades Sides Ever

[noire]

becoming Notts County in red and white.

There is still time yet….

 

[blade67]

So you would consider this lot worse than a side that conceded 4 at home to Shrewsbury and 3 at home to Bury?,

That side was pathetic as was the Martin Peters shambles.

This lot are having a right go at it though

 

[Gavlar]

Seeing as the Adkins side finished 11th in league 1, they are comfortably worse than this team. Still time to equal or better it though!

 

[Geordie Blade]

No. They are worse because they SHOULD be better given their supposed standards and incentives.

This is not a difficult concept.

utb

With all respect, it is a difficult concept. You’re positioning the case as though there can be two measurable values:

1. Expected achievement.
2. Actual achievement.

…with ‘worst’ being the team with the greatest negative magnitude of difference between the two.

The second measure can easily be measured by league position. Presumably the first has to measured by subjective opinion? Or were you thinking of an objective measure like a previous league position? Maybe the end of the previous season? If so, your measure would need to be adjusted based on the transfers in and out, available budget and other constrictions. How would you quantify those?

Out of interest, would your definition of ‘best’ be the reverse of this? That would probably make Bob Booker our best ever player.

 

[programmechap]

With all respect, it is a difficult concept. You’re positioning the case as though there can be two measurable values:

1. Expected achievement.
2. Actual achievement.

…with ‘worst’ being the team with the greatest negative magnitude of difference between the two.

The second measure can easily be measured by league position. Presumably the first has to measured by subjective opinion? Or were you thinking of an objective measure like a previous league position? Maybe the end of the previous season? If so, your measure would need to be adjusted based on the transfers in and out, available budget and other constrictions. How would you quantify those?

Out of interest, would your definition of ‘best’ be the reverse of this? That would probably make Bob Booker our best ever player.

That made me think what our biggest drop in league positions in consecutive seasons was, as that gives some measure of underperforming expectations. Theres been 7 seasons where we've dropped 12 or more places.

1974-76 16 places (6th to 22nd)
1897-99 15 places (1st to16th)
2009-11 15 places (8th to 23rd)
1978-80 14 places (20th D2 to 12th D3)
1906-08 13 places (4th to 17th)
1932-34 12 places (10th to 22nd)
1986-88 12 places (9th to 21st)

 

[programmechap]

That made me think what our biggest drop in league positions in consecutive seasons was, as that gives some measure of underperforming expectations. Theres been 7 seasons where we've dropped 12 or more places.

1974-76 16 places (6th to 22nd)
1897-99 15 places (1st to16th)
2009-11 15 places (8th to 23rd)
1978-80 14 places (20th D2 to 12th D3)
1906-08 13 places (4th to 17th)
1932-34 12 places (10th to 22nd)
1986-88 12 places (9th to 21st)

Interestingly, post relegation we've never finished below halfway the following season.

34-5 11th
49-50 3rd
56-7 7th
68-9 9th
76-77 11th
79-80 12th
81-2 1st
88-9 2nd
94-5 8th
07-08 9th
11-12 3rd
21-22 5th
24-25 3rd