dingledog
Well-Known Member
Suspended for 2 years on appeal? Wouldn't surprise me.9 points is not much it means they will probably still be in the play off picture come the end of the season
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Suspended for 2 years on appeal? Wouldn't surprise me.9 points is not much it means they will probably still be in the play off picture come the end of the season
If true what’s the point, make it a free for all, no financial regulation.Suspended for 2 years on appeal? Wouldn't surprise me.
But if you know you're much less likely to get promoted this season, can the owners justify keeping your best players and paying big wages? Will your best players not be desperate to leave?9 points is not much it means they will probably still be in the play off picture come the end of the season
I think he meant first home game, when we played erm palace,Could have sworn that was Bournemouth![]()
Agree - 9 points off Burnley or Leeds this season and they're only a point ahead of us - you can't account for the psychological pressures of being in an actual race.9 points is a lot. In the year they got promoted that takes them from champions to third.
2 Isn't a lot in the grand scheme of things but added pressure on games for us until that bad week.
9 is "only" 3 wins but if there's a close run race that's a big deal.
Leicester have just taken out a new loan from the Australian bank Macquarie. They've had a few off them now. It's how they've kept a cash flow. This one is covered by their latest Prem money they would have received. So they have to keep paying interest instead of receiving the money at a later date.Given the state of the owners’ business there is a potential financial meltdown coming at Leicester. Forget any points deduction, their problems might become deeper than that. I wouldn’t be surprised to see them up for sale.
About time..... wouldn't be same if it was usTelegraph reporting charges to be announced next week
Telegraph reporting charges to be announced next week
Depending on who's reporting is correct and who is "in the know" if found guilty anything from 6-12 points deduction/fined/transfer ban. Personally I don't understand the point of having the rules in place if you don't punish teams that don't abide by them.21 point deduction at least please
Someone I know who works at Leicester has been told there's a "delay" in the salary payments for non-playing staff for December. Very unsure if they'll get paid in time for Christmas![]()
The little people being thrown under the bus again. I've spoken before about staff, suppliers, contractors etc being basically abandoned in these situations when football clubs play fast and loose with other people's livelihoods, Leicester are particularly guilty of this going back to when they built there new stadium, always thought that there title win was tainted by this carry on.Someone I know who works at Leicester has been told there's a "delay" in the salary payments for non-playing staff for December. Very unsure if they'll get paid in time for Christmas![]()
On there forum that they have changed the payment date a day before wages were due so won't get until after ChristmasSomeone I know who works at Leicester has been told there's a "delay" in the salary payments for non-playing staff for December. Very unsure if they'll get paid in time for Christmas![]()
Clubs yet again finding ways to expose the loopholes in the EFL rules.Someone I know who works at Leicester has been told there's a "delay" in the salary payments for non-playing staff for December. Very unsure if they'll get paid in time for Christmas![]()
All employees of the club (not sub contractors eg if they contract out hospiality) are regarded as football creditors so the punishment would be the same as not paying the players. Football creditors are defined as:Clubs yet again finding ways to expose the loopholes in the EFL rules.
As we all know from events across the city, fail to pay your players and you are in embargoes, points deductions, and if it persists for too long and they can walk on a free. That's assets worth (theoretically) millions leaving the company for free.
Are then any penalties for non payment of non-playing staff? If not then there is a clear (and unfair) incentive to prioritise your players above non-playing staff. I'm not sure why there should be any difference in treatment - if player wages are considered "footballing debts" then I see no reason why wages for non-playing staff shouldn`t be similarly considered a footballing debt - you cant operate the football club without them...
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?