That’s only if we’re relegated.Buy for 18m with a buyback of 20m? That is a shockingly bad deal.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
That’s only if we’re relegated.Buy for 18m with a buyback of 20m? That is a shockingly bad deal.
I don't see how it could be forced to go through. Player could just say no.Thats if we go down presumably and if they have to trigger it, it means even if he's shit we get two million back
That's the dream...I have an insider telling me me deal agreed, medical today and announced Friday, plays some part Sunday.
Not this again...This is the 20/21 Brewster
If that's the case then we will have to see it as
- We make 2m on him (wages prob balance that to £0) or minimum its a free loan.
- Villa free up 2m in wages
- Villa don't have egg on their face about losing a homegrown talent
- villa satisfy fairplay rulings.
I'm mainly interested in (if);
- we stay up and villa can't have him back if he bangs 10 goals.
Ok they have an obligation to buy back (player pending) not just an option? Like if we sent Brewster back to Liverpool after relagation. Think that's the bit confusing me. It just seems rather like a loan that uses the majority of our budget.That’s only if we’re relegated.
That's the main thing for me. Gives us a better chance of another £120m next year if he helps keeps us up.If that's the case then we will have to see it as
- We make 2m on him (wages prob balance that to £0) or minimum its a free loan.
- Villa free up 2m in wages
- Villa don't have egg on their face about losing a homegrown talent
- villa satisfy fairplay rulings.
I'm mainly interested in (if);
- we stay up and villa can't have him back if he bangs 10 goals.
Ok they have an obligation to buy back (player pending) not just an option? Like if we sent Brewster back to Liverpool after relagation. Think that's the bit confusing me. It just seems rather like a loan that uses the majority of our budget.
Wouldn’t have thought no money changing hands until end of the season is how it would work but what do I know?But it would be in installments right. Realistically no money may change hands until end of season (apart from on Villa's FFP paperwork which is what they're mostly concerned about)
Wouldn’t have thought no money changing hands until end of the season is how it would work but what do I know?
If it did work like that then PA = win win
We get said player, no money changes hands until the end of season and PA has by then sold the club, then it becomes the new owners problem if we go down and owe AV a barrow full of money?
Maybe they've struck the deal but the relevant club officials haven't signed on the dotted line yet?"Sheffield United Strike 18m Deal to Sign Cameron Archer"
"Sheffield United are ready to finalise a complex deal to sign Cameron Archer"
They are stating two different things in the same article. How can we strike a deal before finalising it
They're REQUIRED to re-sign him if we're relegated?
I guess you could look at it like a loan with an obligation to buy if we stay up as if not we’d get our money back (and a little more)Ok they have an obligation to buy back (player pending) not just an option? Like if we sent Brewster back to Liverpool after relagation. Think that's the bit confusing me. It just seems rather like a loan that uses the majority of our budget.
They're REQUIRED to re-sign him if we're relegated?
Surely not. Why would they agree to that? When we're likely to go down, with or without Archer?
If true it would remove so much of the upside for us. He's exactly the sort of player we'd be counting on to get us back up
I can see a 20m buy back if we go down, that's it. 25m minimum if we stay up
Oooo, there could actually be a post on a villa forum saying “gone to Sheff Utd”Not even started it!
Chop chop mateNot even started it!
I think weve been here before, young lad, buy back, hes shit, we go down............... KloppI‘ve heard it’s around the £20 million mark slightly more but we aren’t going to make a massive profit but if he’s shit and we go down I guess it’s a nice few million to help.
To ease their worries about FFP for this season and then buy him back next season?They're REQUIRED to re-sign him if we're relegated?
Surely not. Why would they agree to that? When we're likely to go down, with or without Archer?
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?