RossingtonBlade
Member
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2017
- Messages
- 627
- Reaction score
- 855
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
I see it slightly differently but only if what they've said is true, but this is the bit we don't know. Assuming what Bettis says is true, then they've wanted him to sign a new contract but he wouldn't sign it, and because of that the club have accepted a bid and the statement is to let the fans know that it's because he wanted to leave rather than us just cashing in an asset for assets sake. I can see all sides on this but I don't think the statement is a bad one, maybe I'm alone in this?That statement from the club is embarrassing. ‘He and his representatives have opted to move to Burnley’ how about rejecting the fucking off then Bettis? You know, that is also an option.
Not bad. I was fearing the worst. But not quite the piss take I was worried for!Very funny
They will start up we won't it's that simpleIs it purely just money joining Burnley? It isn't an upgrade on us clubwise but suppose a better chance of staying up?
I don't just understand this move.
Let’s hope we can!True, but my point is a player who imo has never looked like he wanted to be here has just generated £15m. Question we can ask now is who will club bring in, then we judge!
I seethis as a great opportunity to bring a better fit player in on 4 year contract
Oh no better not sign for Sheffield United they might put a statement of their website when I leave
Appreciate the considered reply. to me it reads as though they are trying to make ‘not signing a contract and assessing his options after this season’ is the same as ‘not wanting to be here’. To me, those two things are very different, but the club are trying to spin it that way.I see it slightly differently but only if what they've said is true, but this is the bit we don't know. Assuming what Bettis says is true, then they've wanted him to sign a new contract but he wouldn't sign it, and because of that the club have accepted a bid and the statement is to let the fans know that it's because he wanted to leave rather than us just cashing in an asset for assets sake. I can see all sides on this but I don't think the statement is a bad one, maybe I'm alone in this?
Far from happy about this, but £15m on the face of it with 1 year left is not a bad fee.
BergeIf we had a choice between Hamer and Berge who would you pick?
it’s all about who comes in now not boohoo we lost Sandra
Fair point there mate, I can see what you mean. I do think it's a tough one for the club if he doesn't want to sign a new contract then that puts United in a really tricky position. If he was going to join Burnley though I think he could have just stayed with us, but maybe Sander just isn't impressed with current recruitment. Hopefully come the end of the window things look a lot better than now!Appreciate the considered reply. to me it reads as though they are trying to make ‘not signing a contract and assessing his options after this season’ is the same as ‘not wanting to be here’. To me, those two things are very different, but the club are trying to spin it that way.
The use of the word reluctantly is just farcical too, IMO. If they wanted to keep him then they could have done.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?