Hagansbootlaces
Well-Known Member
Reported at the time the short list was short because of the desire to keep playing with 3 at the back as it's now played through every age group.Great point! It's easy to give the old "but we didn't buy him any wingers" point again but from looking at the start of the season, was that really our problem? I don't think it was, it may have won us a few more points but would have been papering over the cracks of what our real problem was which was shipping so many goals.
If he wanted to play with 4 at the back and 2 wingers we arguably needed to buy 7 new players (new back 4, 2 wingers, and a CDM). That is on top of already needing a keeper, another LCM, a competent midfielder, and a creative outlet. That's a full team. Do we really think that is a reasonable ask for any club in a transfer window?
Maybe it was PAs fault for hiring someone who was tactically stubborn. Maybe SJ gave the impression he could coach the players into the new system. The answer is probably somewhere in the middle.
As with most interviews, things get said by both sides, but strongly suspect Slav, agreed to 3 at the back, then thought he could change to his formation, if the results were there fair enough, but they weren't and neither was the enthusiasm or work rate from the players
