what did Edwards say....

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?




The lunatics have finally taken over this place and made it acceptable to defend a blatantly sexist comment. Is it a big deal? Not really. Is it worse than Big Rons comments on ITV all that time ago? No. But Edwards has made himself look at proper twat. It has nothing to do with sense of humour or times being different. It was sexist to say it in the 70's and is the same now. Just look at the definition of sexism and it is discriminatory comments based on assumptions around someone's sex.

All the usual defence mechanisms are at play. It's banter, you need to get a sense of humour etc etc. Bollocks. Edwards needs to get on the radio and apologise for being an idiot in this case. Stick to your excellent football commentary and stay away from trying to be funny.
SHUT UPPPPP!!!!!!!!!
 
My point is that only WOMEN give a damn about it, men don't care

I absolutely care about sexism and last I checked, I am a man. I do try not to get drawn into long winded arguments about it on internet messageboards though. I don't always succeed.
 
And I have just pointed out you need to get a life,it's a light hearted throwaway comment a comment had Wednesday won,then we would never had heard a dicky bird about it .

Congratulations for helping to make a mountain out of a molehill

I haven't made a mountain from anything. Old Keith did that with his shit joke from the 1970s.
 
You may think you have a sense of humour but no, you actually don't. I take it you don't mix with too many woman these days as after a few Proseco's, you would literally be too offended. Smile, and laugh it off and the world would be a happier place, it is just banter and most woman love it and are actually better at it!
Where have I said I was offended?
 
So you think its acceptable to be a patriarchal misogynist, but not acceptable to be a racist? That's very reductionist of you. Let's see what Radio Sheffield - his employer - thinks tomorrow.

"...and the winner of this year's po faced indignant random anger award goes to ...."

Bloody hell get off your soap box. He made an ill advised comment that isn't acceptable in today's society. He will apologise, move on. There are far worse issues in this world that we choose to conveniently ignore...

Hopefully that will see the end of it, but if an apology isn't acceptable to the snowflake Blades and shit stirring pigs, then he should be tarred and feathered for this most heinous of crimes.
 
I absolutely care about sexism and last I checked, I am a man. I do try not to get drawn into long winded arguments about it on internet messageboards though. I don't always succeed.



It's true, long winded arguments on the internet don't work. Which is why I tried to make my point and left it at that

If you care about sexism well done, so do I.

But I draw the line in the sand somewhere on what I consider sexist and what I don't.

There's enough problems caused by over sensitive souls who consider everything they see and hear as one form of ism or another, they should get a life.

The girl who has stirred this up is narked about one thing and one thing only.... her football team lost.
 
The problem with Edwards statement is that not all women can cook anymore.



And don't forget, all the world's best chefs are men...........oops sorry!!!!!!
See how easy this sexism thing is, all you do is make a statement of fact and suddenly you're a sexist
 



It's OK, minitru are on the case for the women, just for a change. Sadly they are still 40 places short, perhaps Ms Tickle Wobbly Tits could go on it? Services to the intellectually impaired and socially challenged who are trying to recover from major trauma?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-41380265
 
And don't forget, all the world's best chefs are men...........oops sorry!!!!!!
See how easy this sexism thing is, all you do is make a statement of fact and suddenly you're a sexist
Except that nobody on this thread has attacked any statement of fact as sexist...
 
It's true, long winded arguments on the internet don't work. Which is why I tried to make my point and left it at that

If you care about sexism well done, so do I.

But I draw the line in the sand somewhere on what I consider sexist and what I don't.

There's enough problems caused by over sensitive souls who consider everything they see and hear as one form of ism or another, they should get a life.

The girl who has stirred this up is narked about one thing and one thing only.... her football team lost.

Thats not true, when she got home the Beef Joint was burnt ;)
 
Except that nobody on this thread has attacked any statement of fact as sexist...


Give it time

Edwards comment was a joke, a bit of fun directed at a woman who invaded the pitch so that she could verbally assault a football manager...........for some reason that seems ok.

The problem has been stirred up by a woman who's football team lost, If the Wednesday equivalent of Edwards on the radio that day had said it she wouldn't have complained
 
I think some folks seem hell bent on finding anything to be offended about. To me, it's all about the intent. If it's meant seriously then it shows real ignorance and lack of appreciation for the opposite sex and can be offensive.

Some women at work were having a laugh the other day - they asked, "What's that useless piece of skin on the end of a knob called?" I answered, "Foreskin?" and they said, "No, a man!". I took it as a joke and found it funny. I didn't feel the need to act offended or report it to HR and bring a case against them. That's because I don't think for one moment that they actually do think all men are useless - in the same way that I don't think for one moment Edwards thinks that all women should be home cooking tea.

For heaven's sake, society needs to lighten up a bit! I grew up in an era where it was commonly the woman's role to be home being a wife and mother, doing the domestic chores and raising a family. There was nothing wrong with that at all, just like there's nothing wrong with women who want to pursue a career. It's down to circumstances and personal choice.

It's a sad day when we can't poke a bit of fun at each other without it being taken the wrong way.
 
I think some folks seem hell bent on finding anything to be offended about. To me, it's all about the intent. If it's meant seriously then it shows real ignorance and lack of appreciation for the opposite sex and can be offensive.

Some women at work were having a laugh the other day - they asked, "What's that useless piece of skin on the end of a knob called?" I answered, "Foreskin?" and they said, "No, a man!". I took it as a joke and found it funny. I didn't feel the need to act offended or report it to HR and bring a case against them. That's because I don't think for one moment that they actually do think all men are useless - in the same way that I don't think for one moment Edwards thinks that all women should be home cooking tea.

For heaven's sake, society needs to lighten up a bit! I grew up in an era where it was commonly the woman's role to be home being a wife and mother, doing the domestic chores and raising a family. There was nothing wrong with that at all, just like there's nothing wrong with women who want to pursue a career. It's down to circumstances and personal choice.

It's a sad day when we can't poke a bit of fun at each other without it being taken the wrong way.

Of course. A joke has to be something that isn't correct, or is illogical, or surprises you with the twist, etc. There is no humour in stating the truth or repeating how things are supposed to be. PC has already seen a massive decline in humour on television - humour that's funny, I should say, there are no end of PC comedians. Naturally the skill of humour is getting it right, timing, not overstepping the line, right time right place, but we seem to have entered the era of "easily offended" and that's just, well, not funny.
 
I would say the contrary - everyone knows it's sexist.
The difference is the scale of harm/malice/ill-will/misogyny implicit in the statement which I personally believe to be zilch.
I also believe the same, really like Keith and don't think he meant any harm at all.
Personally not offended in the slightest, hope he gets a slap on the wrist and we move on.
 
The lunatics have finally taken over this place and made it acceptable to defend a blatantly sexist comment. Is it a big deal? Not really. Is it worse than Big Rons comments on ITV all that time ago? No. But Edwards has made himself look at proper twat. It has nothing to do with sense of humour or times being different. It was sexist to say it in the 70's and is the same now. Just look at the definition of sexism and it is discriminatory comments based on assumptions around someone's sex.

All the usual defence mechanisms are at play. It's banter, you need to get a sense of humour etc etc. Bollocks. Edwards needs to get on the radio and apologise for being an idiot in this case. Stick to your excellent football commentary and stay away from trying to be funny.
Excellent Football commentary?Guess it's all subjective but the guy put's me to sleep with his know all i never made a mistake in all my career attitude.Talks in riddles for me and wish we could find someone more succinct and less myopic. UTB.
 
Bloody hell get off your soap box. He made an ill advised comment that isn't acceptable in today's society. He will apologise, move on. There are far worse issues in this world that we choose to conveniently ignore...
Absolutely spot on Razor1967. Im sure Edwards will apologise....or maybe not. Move on.
 
As we're on sexism, I've just seen the macmillan advert - which basically says "you are a woman, you can bake a cake, your female friend can bake a cake, you will have a male boss, your male boss cannot bake a cake and will buy one from a shop" - which is astonishing really, because every other TV advert says women are competent, capable, intelligent, in control, head of the household, married to useless, foolish, laughable men whose children laugh at him.
 
Firstly, it was an 'old man' comment. Crass and not really appropriate for the modern world but not meant with any malice.

But, I used to work for a woman. She recently retired. I know how hard she had to work to get where she was and how much shit she had to put up with from blokes in the 70s, 80s etc which included snide little jokes like 'she should be at home cooking her husband's dinner'. What Keith said didn't particularly offend me but I can see quite easily why my ex-boss, and thousands of other women that have had to deal with inequality on a daily basis, could find it offensive.
 
I think some folks seem hell bent on finding anything to be offended about. To me, it's all about the intent. If it's meant seriously then it shows real ignorance and lack of appreciation for the opposite sex and can be offensive.

Some women at work were having a laugh the other day - they asked, "What's that useless piece of skin on the end of a knob called?" I answered, "Foreskin?" and they said, "No, a man!". I took it as a joke and found it funny. I didn't feel the need to act offended or report it to HR and bring a case against them. That's because I don't think for one moment that they actually do think all men are useless - in the same way that I don't think for one moment Edwards thinks that all women should be home cooking tea.

For heaven's sake, society needs to lighten up a bit! I grew up in an era where it was commonly the woman's role to be home being a wife and mother, doing the domestic chores and raising a family. There was nothing wrong with that at all, just like there's nothing wrong with women who want to pursue a career. It's down to circumstances and personal choice.

It's a sad day when we can't poke a bit of fun at each other without it being taken the wrong way.

Banter between work colleagues or mates, when there's a relationship and understanding between people, is different to someone speaking to thousands of people he doesn't know and is in a relatively privileged position.
I doubt what Edwards said was particularly serious (if it was he's clearly stuck in the era when he first got into our first team) but even so he could just simply say 'I wasn't being serious but if anyone was offended I apologise'.
 



Banter between work colleagues or mates, when there's a relationship and understanding between people, is different to someone speaking to thousands of people he doesn't know and is in a relatively privileged position.
I doubt what Edwards said was particularly serious (if it was he's clearly stuck in the era when he first got into our first team) but even so he could just simply say 'I wasn't being serious but if anyone was offended I apologise'.
That would be the sensible approach. Just apologise and put it to bed.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom