Bladezz
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 13, 2016
- Messages
- 5,546
- Reaction score
- 5,935
So it begins they are back out.Showed them far too much respect, got what we deserved, all our attacking threats on the bench!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
So it begins they are back out.Showed them far too much respect, got what we deserved, all our attacking threats on the bench!!
Yep. He was.Cowardly as in Wilder was afraid of Leeds? He just thought it gave us the best chance of getting a result.
The justification is he thought it would work. Imagine thinking it'd work, but then bottling it because it looks strange to change a winning team.
It doesn’t look brave to play him, it’s what we’ve been doing all season and it has been delivering results. Showing so much respect to Leeds that you change a winning formula simply suggests that you accept that you’re second best before you’ve even kicked off.Would you prefer him to have played Rak Sakyi because it looks brave, despite actually thinking it would make us more likely to lose?
Yes, the way to make friends, the way to encourage fans to come and watch, the way to be entertaining even if you get beat.Might as well go all out attack and lose
I'm not denying the poor performance, and i agree wilder set us up for a point. Just think some fans were getting excited about the prospect of being the next invincibles. Was never going to happen. We've lost tonight yes, but there's a lot of games to go. Fully expect us to take 6 points from the next 2 games
No they don’tOp is a bedwetting....again. fuck me some of our fans genuinely think we're entitled to win every game
No they don’t
What a fkin stupid thing to say
This is SUFC not Man City !
But to set us up in a way that many thought would deliver the outcome that actually happened - as a professional manager - was incompetent
Poor tactics
And it’s not in hindsight - read the posts before kick off
Poor job Chris
Should he not have been afraid? Would going for it against the best team in the league away from home have worked?Yep. He was.
If you think otherwise that’s fine, but you don’t line up like that unless you’re afraid of the opposition![]()
We are second best to Leeds and we're away from home. It's easy for fans to only focus on ourselves and pretend other teams don't exist, but the manager has to.It doesn’t look brave to play him, it’s what we’ve been doing all season and it has been delivering results. Showing so much respect to Leeds that you change a winning formula simply suggests that you accept that you’re second best before you’ve even kicked off.
You were full on everything is ok at half time ?The best comment on this thread is we had the best defense in the league why change it ? With hindsight he should have started with Rak-Sakyi or brooks , but we all make mistakes we move on and go for it next match !!
Spot on NIt doesn’t look brave to play him, it’s what we’ve been doing all season and it has been delivering results. Showing so much respect to Leeds that you change a winning formula simply suggests that you accept that you’re second best before you’ve even kicked off.
Worked fairly well? I’m not sure what game you watched mateShould he not have been afraid? Would going for it against the best team in the league away from home have worked?
The line of criticism makes sense, not trying to be a nob. I don't think the formation blunted us, we just played a bit shit. That's on Wilder as well, but he's hardly chucked the points away. We tried something, it worked fairly well but not enough.
What didn’t he do that didn’t bottle it ?Wilder might have got it wrong. I don’t think so, but he might.
What he didn’t do is bottle it.
Never in a month of Sundays !!
UTB
How many chances did they have before the goal? The Aaronson one on the volley, can't think of another.Worked fairly well? I’m not sure what game you watched mate
Agree regarding Peck learning the game, and another factor is that defensive players had gone off rather than to sleep. It was the 91st minute and we’d put attacking options on to chase a goal: the risk of another goal was always there.Oh I dont care about that team of the week stuff, but coops couldn't save the first goal, and the second was all on peck, who's a kid learning the game.
That first, nobody saves it it's a great goal, the second, a defender should be dealing with it, they went to sleep and left peck to try and sort it..
We all know Bogle can't defend, why make his night easier?The only change we could/should have made was Peck for o'Hare and pack midfield. Not picking Rak Saki/Brooks meant we had no attacking outlet.
I'm not expert, but surely lining Rak Sakhi up against Bogle in was the play here tonight???
Fair comment..Agree regarding Peck learning the game, and another factor is that defensive players had gone off rather than to sleep. It was the 91st minute and we’d put attacking options on to chase a goal: the risk of another goal was always there.
Come on, take those rose tinted glasses off instead of throwing abuseDo one knobhead.
There is a presumption (and misconception IMHO) that going to 3 at the back was a negative and more defensive move. I don’t necessarily agree.What didn’t he do that didn’t bottle it ?
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?