What a tit blackwell is

[Deleted member 1466]

1. Where has cotts been all season?

2. How does that waste of space quinn stay in the team infront of hendrie?

3. Look what happens when we play football, its only taken 7 months into the season, well done blackwell

4. Billy Sharp, play the ball to his feet, and he will hold it and bring others into play.

5. Stop playing danny webber, he is beyond shit.

Well done today, but i cant help but think we would be alot higher up the league if we would have been playing like that style of play all season.

 

[Sensiblade]

1. Where has cotts been all season?
Everytime he's come on or started he's been awful upto today.
Hope after today he goes on to play like he did last season

2. How does that waste of space quinn stay in the team infront of hendrie?
They both played today? How is that ahead of Hendrie?

3. Look what happens when we play football, its only taken 7 months into the season, well done blackwell
We did play alot better today, the difference is we were allowed to by the opposition and some (not all) of our Championship opponents would not have allowed us to play that style.

4. Billy Sharp, play the ball to his feet, and he will hold it and bring others into play.
He is better playing like this

5. Stop playing danny webber, he is beyond shit.
Did some ok stuff when he came on, but needs to improve


Well done today, but i cant help but think we would be alot higher up the league if we would have been playing like that style of play all season.

Hope we can go on from this on a good run.

 

[Deleted member 1466]

cotterill has not been awful every time he has played, he has never been given a chance in the team, funny how he has the most assists this season even though hes played about 4 minutes.

they both played today, its one game, how quinn gets in the team infront of anyone at the club is beyond me, he is dog shit at best.

and you play how you want to play, funny how swansea and donny manage to pass the ball every week isnt it, dont give me excuses about how other teams let you play. you play how you want to play!

 

[Lincoln Blade]

I agree 100% soloman, cotterill has played a 1/10 of the time that our other 'wingers' have played and yet has more assists than them. Its simple really because he is an actual winger and can take on players and get decent crosses in.

I agree with your early points about webber and sharp as well. Sharp is much better with the ball on the deck (goes without saying really) and webber has been very poor for a long while now. He has the worst player on the pitch last week for me, if blackwell stands by his statement 'if the player plays well he will keep his place in the team' then webber should be out.

Lincoln Blade

 

[shorehamview]

....if blackwell stands by his statement 'if the player plays well he will keep his place in the team' then webber should be out.

And on that same basis then Monty, a player slated regularly by many Blades, will be one of the first three on the teamsheet as once again he played very well. So is Blackwell a tit if he picks Monty for the next match?
This from the "If We Sold Monty" thread.....

........it would mean i wouldnt have to watch him being shit every week.......

And has Monty been shit every week? No. Good job you don't pick the team then, isn't it?

 

[Deleted member 1466]

get a grip, that was from when he was playing shit, why dont i just dig up a thread about tonge from the day after we played liverpool at the lane in 2003 and use it as a case against us selling him

think about it!

 

[happyhippy]

get a grip, that was from when he was playing shit,

All of three weeks ago ......

why dont i just dig up a thread about tonge from the day after we played liverpool at the lane in 2003 and use it as a case against us selling him

All of six years ago.

think about it!

Physician, heal thyself.

 

[shorehamview]

get a grip, that was from when he was playing shit,

Your post was dated 28th January this year. Hardly the same as Tonge against Liverpool from six years ago, is it?

think about it!

I was referring to you, less than three weeks ago, calling Monty shit. Unless you are denying it?
Not six years ago, three years ago, three months ago or even as long as three weeks ago. Seventeen days ago. That's just three matches. Less than three hundred minutes of football. Has he really come on so much that you have completely changed your opinion of a player in seventeen days?
I suggest you "get a grip" and "think about it" for even a little while.

 

[Deleted member 1466]

who cares how long ago, whats in the past is in the past, montgomery was fucking shit when i made that post, he has improved the last few games!

why are you even bringing him up? is this thread about him? errr, no i dont think it was was it!

 

[shorehamview]

who cares how long ago, whats in the past is in the past, montgomery was fucking shit when i made that post, he has improved the last few games!

why are you even bringing him up? is this thread about him? errr, no i dont think it was was it!

It was Blackwell being a tit. My point is that he isn't. Your point was that Tonge was good six years ago.
Next please Nurse.....

And to be honest if I want to write a load of random waffle that's got fuck-all to do with the start of the thread then I won't be the first and I won't be the last, but I'll be one of the funniest, and certainly in the top five of best looking. You all know that's the truth.

 

[Deleted member 1466]

why dont you say something about the points i made, rather than bring a post about monty being shit (after a horrific game he had aswell) (last month, aswell) into it?

 

[Deleted member 1466]

It was Blackwell being a tit. My point is that he isn't. Your point was that Tonge was good six years ago.
Next please Nurse.....

And to be honest if I want to write a load of random waffle that's got fuck-all to do with the start of the thread then I won't be the first and I won't be the last, but I'll be one of the funniest, and certainly in the top five of best looking. You all know that's the truth.

you are about as funny as cancer.

 

[shorehamview]

why dont you say something about the points i made, rather than bring a post about monty being shit (after a horrific game he had aswell) (last month, aswell) into it?

Most of them are wrong?

you are about as funny as cancer.

And that's not very nice, but if it's true it's a fuck of a sight funnier than you, young man.
And now I'll let you get back to your Power Rangers, before Auntie Linz slaps me down.

 

[Deleted member 1466]

my points are wrong?

ok then, drop hendrie and cotterill, start booting it to sharps head, and have done with it

you clearly are an idiot, so im done talking to you.

 

[jose_d_blade]

Some posts people publish in responce to construcive well thought threads,are just negetive i think theres a lot of passive aggresive fashists on this forum.
im in total agreement with you soloman

 

[beightonblade]

Blackberry is a tit.........err i mean Blackwell is a tit.

Remind me again: why was his contract extended ?

 

[Lincoln Blade]

No need to revert to personal insults is there.

And on that same basis then Monty, a player slated regularly by many Blades, will be one of the first three on the teamsheet as once again he played very well. So is Blackwell a tit if he picks Monty for the next match?
This from the "If We Sold Monty" thread.....

And has Monty been shit every week? No. Good job you don't pick the team then, isn't it?

What a ridiculous thing to say, your jumping to the defense of monty and he hasnt even been slated!!! It was actually me who said that about webber and agree that one bad game doesn't mean you should be completely removed from the first team but if you play consistantly poor and are given a number of opportunities like webber you should be dropped from the team. (I know he didnt start today).

I stand by what solomon says about the usage of cotterill, sharp and webber. Three key areas that we have got recently and we can easily rectify.

Lincoln Blade

 

[Linz]

Some posts people publish in responce to construcive well thought threads,are just negetive i think theres a lot of passive aggresive fashists on this forum.
im in total agreement with you soloman

There are also a lot of people who are just damned old-fashioned aggressive. If people can't handle their points of view being questioned, then they should have a conversation with a mirror. NOT start a thread on a DISCUSSION forum.

Infractions handed out where due and a reminder about respect.

I am losing patience with certain posters.

 

[Foxy]

1. Where has cotts been all season?

Unfortunately, he's been busy being nowhere near as good as he was last year. He's been poor and added little to the team. People will say that according to the programme he has the most assists. Whilst it may be true he has the most direct assists, I think others have created far more chances and goals (although they've had more time on the pitch as they've been playing better).

If Cotterill can keep up the performance from yesterday, he should stay in the team. If it drops, he should be back on the bench/out of the squad. He wasn't as outstanding or amazing as some are making out, but he had a good game. Put a few good crosses in, one of which we scored from.

2. How does that waste of space quinn stay in the team infront of hendrie?

I'd hazard a guess it's because as well as having scored loads of goals, he also works very hard off the ball. He's had some poor games recently and I said a month or so ago that he could do with a rest, but I can see why he's picked.

3. Look what happens when we play football, its only taken 7 months into the season, well done blackwell

It's not just Blackwell, it's the players.

4. Billy Sharp, play the ball to his feet, and he will hold it and bring others into play.

If Sharp is going to be successful, you are right, we do need to play him differently. Whether he's good enough at this level is still up for debate though. I think he needs to work on different areas of his fitness and start concentrating on the ball rather than the defender. He seems to have bulked up in an effort to become stronger (making it harder for him to become faster), he also very often concentrates on a battle with the defender before the ball.

5. Stop playing danny webber, he is beyond shit.

Unfortunately I think that Webber is becoming the new scapegoat. He hasn't been brilliant, and he's had a number of poor games this season... But I think he's also had some unfair treatment. He's useful as he adds something else to the team, he's also one of the few strikers we had available for yesterdays match. Unfortunately for Danny Webber himself, Mr Lupoli offers similar qualities with the benefit of being a bit taller and more unpredictable.

The problem is, professional footballers aren't simply "shit" and they all offer many different qualities during a game/shown in training etc. It's not as simple as just deciding that because someone had a poor game that they aren't good enough for future fixtures. You said previously that Monty was "utter dogshit", Blackwell thought otherwise and I'd suggest myself that yesterday was another example from many as to why Monty isn't "utter dogshit".

At the moment, three players who have been criticised by a number of people for the majority of the season would be some of the first on my team sheet: Nick Montgomery, Greg Halford and Lee Hendrie.

Well done today, but i cant help but think we would be alot higher up the league if we would have been playing like that style of play all season.

Maybe so, but we could have also been a lot lower. I'd prefer us to carry on as we did on Saturday, but every game is different and we have different players available next Saturday. If Hendrie is fit, I'd start him (as I've been saying ever since pre-season!).

 

[jose_d_blade]

There are also a lot of people who are just damned old-fashioned aggressive. If people can't handle their points of view being questioned, then they should have a conversation with a mirror. NOT start a thread on a DISCUSSION forum.

Infractions handed out where due and a reminder about respect.

I am losing patience with certain posters.

Am I being told off for being pro-aggressive?

Just showing support for the initial post of Solomon when he stated things that I see as fact imo.

For his valid point to be dragged into a debate about a totally none related post just to discredit his point.

I like good old fashioned debate if there even on the same page let alone chapter.

Some people just post negative view points over other peoples arguments with little regard to the initial topic.

Why? because they don’t like the other persons opinion,

To then preach on in a pedantic provocative manner to cause a nee jerk reaction and then claim to be the victim.

Hence passive aggressive.

Should I not post my opinion also?
Is there really free speech or is it only when it suits?

 

[Linz]

Am I being told off for being pro-aggressive?

No... it was a telling off for all the perpetrators of hassle on this thread.

Just showing support for the initial post of Solomon when he stated things that I see as fact imo.

And there are ways of doing this without resorting to calling people names... which is what I was pointing out.

For his valid point to be dragged into a debate about a totally none related post just to discredit his point.

Who is to decide what point is valid and what is not? I see you believe that is your job.

It isn't.

Everyone can have their say. Certainly no one has stopped anyone saying anything in this thread. The discussion is open is it not?

Discuss.

Should I not post my opinion also?
Is there really free speech or is it only when it suits?

Ah... I love it when people point to free speech.

The people who cling on to it are usually the ones who are trying to stop other people having their say in the name of allowing "free speech".

"I want to have my say but no one else can have theirs".

That isn't free speech.

I am happy for all debate to happen as long as it is within our rules. Therefore, free speech does not exist on this forum. You are not allowed to call people names. You are also not allowed to try stopping other people having their say when they feel a point is valid.

If you have any issues with posts, there is a report post icon.

I trust we can get back on to some semblance of topic now?

 

[Foxy]

Am I being told off for being pro-aggressive?

I don't see where exactly you were singled out and told off? If you'd received an infraction, you'd have a message telling you so.

Just showing support for the initial post of Solomon when he stated things that I see as fact imo.

There is a key point to this sentence: "things that I see as fact imo".
Facts aren't the same as opinions. If people have opposing opinions then they will voice them, this doesn't mean either is wrong in fact providing we are discussing opinions.

For his valid point to be dragged into a debate about a totally none related post just to discredit his point.

The discussion on Nick Montgomery is actually quite pertinent to this discussion as it is an shining example of very similar opinion put across a short time ago.

Post 1 - Blackwell doesn't have a clue, Nick Montgomery is shit.

Post 2 - Blackwell doesn't have a clue, X is shit.

Similar wouldn't you agree?

Should I not post my opinion also?
Is there really free speech or is it only when it suits?

Kinda pointless me putting time and money into creating and maintaining a forum if nobody was allowed to put across their opinion wouldn't you say?

Something everyone needs to remember is that others will have differing opinions, this is what causes debate. If someone has a differing opinion, this doesn't mean you don't have "free speech", it means not everyone thinks the same.

If anyone's definition of free speech is giving their opinion and refusing to listen to/debate anyone else's, then they are in the wrong place.

If people can put across their opinions in a sensible and thought out way, then discussion works and often common ground/healthy debate ensues. If people on the other hand just want to shout louder than others, ignoring their opinion and feel victimised when someone doesn't agree... It pretty much just degenerates into stupid name calling and points scoring.

 

[jose_d_blade]

I did state it was my opinion not a matter of fact.

I wasn't calling any one names.

"Who is to decide what point is valid and what is not? I see you believe that is your job." …..”it is not” never said it was, I wouldn’t be so presumptuous again as I stated at the top of this and previous post its my opinion...

I’m hardly trying to stop others posting only supporting posts I agree with.

I don’t condone name calling but I emphasise with people’s frustrations when provoked with pedantic petty argument’s imo.

We will have to agree to disagree on this matter.

Dose feel like I’m being shot down for voicing my opinions I’ll stay away for a few days so some one else can take the flack.

Sorry if my opinion’s offends

 

[Linz]

I don’t condone name calling but I emphasise with people’s frustrations when provoked with pedantic petty argument’s imo.

But what is a "petty argument" to one person is a valid point for someone else.

I can see you really don't understand where we're coming from.

If there is one thing to take from my and Foxy's posts is that the way to disagree with someone is to argue the point... not call people names or refer to them as "fascists" at the slightest hint of them disagreeing with you.

That's teddies out of the pram tactics.

 

[silverfox]

I think Blades fans should be given "chill out pills" every morning.

 

[Foxy]

Dose feel like I’m being shot down for voicing my opinions I’ll stay away for a few days so some one else can take the flack.

Sorry if my opinion’s offends

Just how have you been shot down?

If you think people are intentionally given flack, please PM me with your concerns.

No-one has said they are offended by your opinion or told you off as you seem to think.

 

[MAQ]

what are the odds of having a thread anytime soon whereby it doesnt eventually turn into this same conversation!

 

[Sensiblade]

what are the odds of having a thread anytime soon whereby it doesnt eventually turn into this same conversation!

Unlikely

 

[SouthEssexBlade]

I blame SV and his very suspect belief that making yourself look like Gok Wan = good looking!

 

[BexleyBlade]

cotterill has not been awful every time he has played, he has never been given a chance in the team, funny how he has the most assists this season even though hes played about 4 minutes.

they both played today, its one game, how quinn gets in the team infront of anyone at the club is beyond me, he is dog shit at best.

and you play how you want to play, funny how swansea and donny manage to pass the ball every week isnt it, dont give me excuses about how other teams let you play. you play how you want to play!

Yeah, lets all play like Donny. Who knows we may be fighting against relegation then?